Let me get to the point. You, sir, are the worst kind of snake-oil salesman. You don't actually care about representing "Discordia", you care about something else. Controversy, maybe? Getting the "big" names? Internet famous? Whatever. Doesn't matter. If you wanted to give an accurate portrayal of "modern Discordia", then Loveshade wouldn't be in it, and the rest of those who protested would. You are holding onto one (1) person's contributions, at the risk of losing... 5, 10, 50, 100? At what point is the loss enough?
Yanno, I hate to say it, Dingo, but Phox nailed it.
This is like asking Cardinal Law to represent the Catholic Church.
We don't know that HE is a pedophile. We just know that HE defended THEM.
And yes, I just made it local.
Because as bollocks as it is, I will always be a Bostonian. And I will always be a former Catholic.
You can only shift around so much. Does "Father" John Geoghan represent Catholicism?
Would you interview him if he was murdered in retribution in jail?
Is the late/too early "Father" Geoghan a representation of Roman Catholicism?
Because, even though I'm just playing with Catholicism, I will not tolerate misrepresentative bullshit.
I will not tolerate painting priests as kiddie fuckers.
I will not tolerate Discordians being loveshaded.
See what I did there?
Write what you want.
Bostonian. Catholic. Discordian. Worked with a Geoghan victim.