My... "Interests" - TRIGGER WARNING: EVERYTHING!!11!

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

I think my favorite part is "I love everything you guys do"

"OH WAIT NO, NOT WHEN YOU DO IT TO ME, NOW IT'S TERRIBLE"

[hooplala]

I think my favorite part is "I love everything you guys do"

"OH WAIT NO, NOT WHEN YOU DO IT TO ME, NOW IT'S TERRIBLE"

Hive mind in 3... 2...

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

I think my favorite part is "I love everything you guys do"

"OH WAIT NO, NOT WHEN YOU DO IT TO ME, NOW IT'S TERRIBLE"

Hive mind in 3... 2...

He's seen us do this very thing in the past, you know.

[hooplala]

I think my favorite part is "I love everything you guys do"

"OH WAIT NO, NOT WHEN YOU DO IT TO ME, NOW IT'S TERRIBLE"

Hive mind in 3... 2...

He's seen us do this very thing in the past, you know.

He's probably been manipulating this entire scenario for months.

[POFP]

You go, Fernando!

This'll be just enough to get me through tomorrow. You have no idea how long it's been since I've heard that.

By flow I mean the ideas don't follow easily. Are you contradicting the single part of my post which was a direct quote from you?

The body of my thread, the part where I throw up bullshit pseudo psychology and connect them to random childhood references, was an idea I wanted to put into play for awhile. Even if the shitstorm in OPEN BAR had never happened, I would've eventually posted it. But, it just so happened to tie in with the shitstorm and give me a sarcastic context to write it in. Personally, that made it even better.

I'm separating the two ideas that you obviously misunderstood to be connected.

The second part of my post was obviously directed toward your suggestion that skimming the replies gave me poor judgment of the mentality of the audience.

The part you seem to be missing, or at least pretending to miss, is that the content of the OP is functionally identical to everything else you've ever written in here. It may seem like cutting satire to you, but really it's just marginally more of the same.

And then you had to go and ruin the day again.

Ain't I a stinker?

Wouldn't that just mean the shitstorm previous to this was just a satire splooge-fest, too? You can't honestly, think that...

Poe's Law.

Taking the safe way out, I see. You take care, now.

I don't consider that information very high-level. I don't think anyone would consider that information very high level. Why would you assume I was being condescending or whatever the fuck?

REALLY??? YOU KID.



1.) You are so shockingly unobservant about the people that you interact with that I really wonder whether your entire vaunted ability to "read" and "manipulate" people is entirely based in self-deception.

2.) I DO rather hope that your next parlor trick will be explaining the international politics of terrorism in simplified terms, though. Just for the lail.

FIXED

1.) I guess I wouldn't know, would I?

2.) I don't understand shit about terrorism. I don't claim to have any superior knowledge to anyone about anything on this forum. In-fact, most of the time I end up humbling myself, and claiming to know very little about most topics compared to everyone here. Why else would I be here? I don't come here to boast, I come here to learn and contribute as much as I can to the debates and humor I claim to at least know something about. Dislike me all you want. But I'm not here for a fucking pissing contest.

It's hard to imagine why anyone would perceive you as condescending, isn't it? Almost impossible.

I understand that I have a huge ego. I'm not denying that. But assuming that every attempt at complex thought is condescending because of it is just unproductive. If I ever seem condescending, I'm NOT trying to be. It's probably just one of many problems I still have to work on.

Being preachy can be effective for certain crowds. Obviously this one is NOT receptive to it. Just like I'm not that receptive to your "suggestive mockery."

Oh honey, aren't you precious? I am way past trying to help you. Once I start making fun of you instead of talking to you, I am doing it purely to entertain myself and what you get out of it (or don't) is your problem.

So, you mock those whom you are sure have some kind of mental issue, and you do it for your own entertainment without regard to their well-being? And you have the nerve to make a moral judgment on my treatment of my girlfriend? Sounds like a mix of sadism and an ego that's too big to let you see the hypocrisy. I suggest a therapist.

Is "self-absorbed, clueless twit" a mental disorder now?

Even if it was, I doubt you'd even care. I've established ownership of every aspect I can think of for NPD, yet, no sympathy. I mean, you're just as bad. Most of the time, Narcissists tend to establish a camaraderie. An understanding.

That must mean one of us isn't Narcissistic.

[Doktor Howl]

 

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

I don't really have any sympathy for sociopaths, either.

I guess I'm just a dick that way.

You want sympathy for having a personality disorder that makes you a shitty person? Talk to your therapist, because I DGAF.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

I think my favorite part is "I love everything you guys do"

"OH WAIT NO, NOT WHEN YOU DO IT TO ME, NOW IT'S TERRIBLE"

Hive mind in 3... 2...

He's seen us do this very thing in the past, you know.

He's probably been manipulating this entire scenario for months.

It'll turn out to be Dead Kennedy.

That guy was possibly my favorite troll of all time. I mean, he was an awful person, but FFS he really put his heart and soul into his trolling.

[hooplala]

You go, Fernando!

This'll be just enough to get me through tomorrow. You have no idea how long it's been since I've heard that.

By flow I mean the ideas don't follow easily. Are you contradicting the single part of my post which was a direct quote from you?

The body of my thread, the part where I throw up bullshit pseudo psychology and connect them to random childhood references, was an idea I wanted to put into play for awhile. Even if the shitstorm in OPEN BAR had never happened, I would've eventually posted it. But, it just so happened to tie in with the shitstorm and give me a sarcastic context to write it in. Personally, that made it even better.

I'm separating the two ideas that you obviously misunderstood to be connected.

The second part of my post was obviously directed toward your suggestion that skimming the replies gave me poor judgment of the mentality of the audience.

The part you seem to be missing, or at least pretending to miss, is that the content of the OP is functionally identical to everything else you've ever written in here. It may seem like cutting satire to you, but really it's just marginally more of the same.

And then you had to go and ruin the day again.

Ain't I a stinker?

Wouldn't that just mean the shitstorm previous to this was just a satire splooge-fest, too? You can't honestly, think that...

Poe's Law.

Taking the safe way out, I see. You take care, now.

I'm serious. They are indistinguishable from this side.

[Doktor Howl]

What I love is how these guys think that doubling-down will let them WIN.

There's no possible prize for "victory", but still they try.  And try and try and try.

A few months later, they're a curiosity in the Peanut Gallery subforum.

A few months after that, the next one kicks the door in with their underwear on their heads, bound and determined to SHOW US ALL.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

You go, Fernando!

This'll be just enough to get me through tomorrow. You have no idea how long it's been since I've heard that.

By flow I mean the ideas don't follow easily. Are you contradicting the single part of my post which was a direct quote from you?

The body of my thread, the part where I throw up bullshit pseudo psychology and connect them to random childhood references, was an idea I wanted to put into play for awhile. Even if the shitstorm in OPEN BAR had never happened, I would've eventually posted it. But, it just so happened to tie in with the shitstorm and give me a sarcastic context to write it in. Personally, that made it even better.

I'm separating the two ideas that you obviously misunderstood to be connected.

The second part of my post was obviously directed toward your suggestion that skimming the replies gave me poor judgment of the mentality of the audience.

The part you seem to be missing, or at least pretending to miss, is that the content of the OP is functionally identical to everything else you've ever written in here. It may seem like cutting satire to you, but really it's just marginally more of the same.

And then you had to go and ruin the day again.

Ain't I a stinker?

Wouldn't that just mean the shitstorm previous to this was just a satire splooge-fest, too? You can't honestly, think that...

Poe's Law.

Taking the safe way out, I see. You take care, now.

I'm serious. They are indistinguishable from this side.

Yeah, I can't tell either. Troll? Sincere? Whatever... either way there's no reasoning with it.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

What I love is how these guys think that doubling-down will let them WIN.

There's no possible prize for "victory", but still they try.  And try and try and try.

A few months later, they're a curiosity in the Peanut Gallery subforum.

A few months after that, the next one kicks the door in with their underwear on their heads, bound and determined to SHOW US ALL.

It's like the beautiful, ineffable cycle of life.

[Doktor Howl]

What I love is how these guys think that doubling-down will let them WIN.

There's no possible prize for "victory", but still they try.  And try and try and try.

A few months later, they're a curiosity in the Peanut Gallery subforum.

A few months after that, the next one kicks the door in with their underwear on their heads, bound and determined to SHOW US ALL.

It's like the beautiful, ineffable cycle of life.

We could call it "AKK's Principle", if we could tighten it up a bit.

[POFP]

Nigel, your posts are getting edgier and edgier with every passing minute. Your apathy is obviously just a subconscious defense mechanism created by your delicate ego. Luckily, I have experience with such unfortunate predispositions.

If you ever want help with that, just let me know. I've studied megalomaniacs for years, now - Online and off. I'm quite in-tune with the little mind tricks they play on themselves.

[hooplala]

Nigel, your posts are getting edgier and edgier with every passing minute. Your apathy is obviously just a subconscious defense mechanism created by your delicate ego. Luckily, I have experience with such unfortunate predispositions.

If you ever want help with that, just let me know. I've studied megalomaniacs for years, now - Online and off. I'm quite in-tune with the little mind tricks they play on themselves.

Can we keep him?