Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - LuciferX

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 128
1
Literate Chaotic / Re: Five word horror
« on: Yesterday at 10:47:59 pm »
Babel hibernates in binary code.

2
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: The Case Against Reality
« on: Yesterday at 10:41:54 pm »
:lulz: :lulz: :lulz:

3
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: The Case Against Reality
« on: Yesterday at 07:26:53 pm »
A cheating god would have been a superior god if only no one else noticed.  Oh well :lulz:

4
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: The Case Against Reality
« on: April 27, 2016, 10:06:16 pm »
It's the other way around.  Perception is not framed by natural selection; the conceived process of natural(sexual) selection is based on the structure of perception.  Just how the theory of selection is based on reproduction, so is every perceived moment of our experience.  This is not because of some Freudian bullshit interpretation.  The reason is that in order to have an experience of anything, this now must also be taken together with that which was previously experienced:  experience requires that the past be reproduced inside the present for there to be any kind of experience at all, in the first place.  The (conceptual?) biological overlay just permits our interest in the subject to also be surprisingly fun sexy-times :lulz:

5
Yea, I don't even (really) know what a libertarian is/means, but I do find myself (more than I'd wish to admit) falling for the "rugged individualist" full Marlborough flavor of self-reliance/determination.  At least it can serve as indicator for when my ego pretends to take the reigns...

...

The exact spot where you end and I begin is like an optical illusion - its not actually there, but context clues make it appear to be. When somebody close to you dies, a part of you died too.

This is what the libertarian ideology misses. It presents the self as a castle surrounded by high walls - not a dynamic, sprawling city. Not a net of jewels that reflect each other.



http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/88/wcw-rose-obsolete.html
And yet that unity remains accommodating enough to include within itself not just futile and false distinctions, but an actual difference that concerns me.  There is not unity only in opposition to difference; there is also unity "inside" the difference.  My monkey exists as the fictitious interface of that illusory boundary, struggling perpetually for a sign of relief that instead undermines itself.

6
Could it be possible for a free agent to reason that their capacity to act independently is inextricably interrelated to the free agency of others? Can my rational self-interest be extensive enough to include the effect it has on others?

Yeah, it's simple: don't conflate the self and the ego.

The true self is bigger than that little old thing.

Perhaps, I just can't see it, because my ego is so HUGE.

7
Equality is only commensurate with numerical identity!

8
Sometimes, being wrong's the most endearing thing about primates ;)

9
I think the word people are looking for here is "compassion".


But the scope of that word is too much for some monkeys to bear.
Compassion is a word we invented to give weak monkeys false hope.

10
Snot it.  She said it had nostrils, porpoises don't.

She said lotsa dumbshit things, she's from FahlReev.

Fine.  But then what about all that blood.  Only a beast sporting an olfactory bulb could explain how that makes sense. Totally an apex predator that we're dealing with here.  Lucky someone was left alive to warn us.

11
Snot it.  She said it had nostrils, porpoises don't.

12
We had to start a fear campaign about that body of water because in it's depths we would otherwise find the heart of that tautological machinery which binds us to this earth in service perpetual to the old ones.

13
[edit; Pergamos beat me to it] Reminds me of that chap Lloyd, and his Tragedy of the Commons, where IIRC the rational self-interest of users acts independently of others, thereby depleting common resources.  This assumes, however, that rational self-interest must be at odds with ethical reasoning.

Could it be possible for a free agent to reason that their capacity to act independently is inextricably interrelated to the free agency of others? Can my rational self-interest be extensive enough to include the effect it has on others?

In the end, there is absolutely nothing rational about entirely depleting a common resource, because reason cannot defend an action that undermines the conditions required by it in the first place:
fishing all the fish != fishing.

A little neo-Kantian idealism practically never hurt no one.

(I replaced not having a filter with overfishing, I hope that still works;)

14
Got some kind of eschatological reunion coming up mid-may, where we are to meet different versions of ourselves from across time: 90% from the past (plus offspring), 10% impressionable snot faced punks from the future.  I have half a mind to attend and was wondering what kind of literature I could disseminate.  It would be a good vector.

15
Aneristic Illusions / Re: Utah can't into filters on porn searches
« on: April 24, 2016, 09:33:08 pm »
Porn is the commodification of human beings, but so is wage labor.  Porn is different in that it is he commodification of the sexual act.

Disagree.  Selling your labor is not the same as selling your person.

This is as true when your labor is sex as when it is any other sort of labor though.  Porn stars and other sex workers sell their labor, not their bodies.
Thank you for sharing these distinctions - food for thought here.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 128