Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - LMNO, PhD (life continues)

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 1985
The Trickster accesses your shadow psyche, compelling you.

I counter with

Ugh.  Arguing with a Jungian on FB about Quantum Physics.  Why do I do this?

Already sent PM, but I'll say it publicly: Go for it.

Huh.  Interesting take.  I like the idea or "trust networks" and how it fits into economic theory.  It reminds me of this TED talk, and as brief as it is, really delves deep into the psychological aspects of trade and trust.


Well, at least those practicing homeopathy are drinking enough water.

Maybe everyone was just dehydrated, you know?

I started to write up something about general relativity and how it relates to Newtonian physics, and how classical mechanics is just a limited case of general relativity, but then I realized how useless that would be.  Pearls, swine, etc.

Hm. Not a big fan of FF. But the above page doesn't link to any evidence, nor provides a timeline. FF has been around for 20 years. The above link even says the page was taken down (but not when). So this has a 53% chance of being clickbait.

Holist, your understanding of quantum physics is about 60 years out of date.

I think it's more that the linguistic style does not lend itself well to higher-level thoughts and observations; so when it's attempted, it really opens itself up to misinterpretation.

Not that we know everything. Far from it; we are only starting to gain glimpses into that which we do not know. But there is simply no empiric support for homeopathy. I have slightly more respect for faith healing.

Thank you for meaning well. (<-- just to be clear, that is a completely sincere sentence)

I don't wish to go into it again. I have taken chemistry, I have reviewed the matter quite excessively, and I have been thoroughly convinced that discussing it on PD is a BAD IDEA. So I'm just not doing it.

If that's something you people won't get over, that's just my tough luck.

Yeah, I find it hard to even imagine what kind of incredibly abbreviated liberal-arts version of chemistry you could possibly have taken that would permit you to still believe in the fairies of homeopathy, but go for it, champ.

Look, as you have yourself said, our science is not complete.

I am agnostic about homeopathy (I wouldn't have said this three years ago, I do now).

I am quite certain that the sceptical campaign against homeopathy and many of the so-called studies are unfair, unsuitable for deciding the question, and morally reprehensible in exactly the way Dawkins and his merry band of militant atheists are.

I can imagine homeopathy being merely a particularly effective ritual for turning on the placebo effect. That is interesting in its own right.

I can also imagine homeopathy having an underlying mechanism that we don't know at present. The research into higher-level structures in water seems vaguely promising, but really, I just don't know. I do know that received scientific knowledge can fall. Look at Newtonian mechanics (so elegant, so simple, so beautiful: it must be true!), or, more recently, genetic determinism (one of the most exciting developments I can think of in the life sciences).

I just facepalmed so hard, I can feel the concavity of the back of my skull.

Literate Chaotic / Re: Comic Reviews and discussions
« on: October 17, 2014, 08:24:35 pm »

The Richard Nixon school of ballet and the arts / Re: Ingress
« on: October 17, 2014, 06:03:53 pm »
It was kind of a crappy morning at work, so I took a walk and accidentally the South End.


Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 ... 1985