« on: February 26, 2014, 05:50:47 am »
I read the "different discordian communities" part as BDS saying he was interested in other people's attempts to build their own Discordian internets.
But at the same time, I want to see butt peanuts flourish, so I'm just going to see where this conversation goes.
Dude, all I know is he did the "lots of people" bit ("several", in this case) which he then refused to clarify. Then, when I expressed dismay and discouragement in PM, he was basically like "SORRY TO HEAR THAT, HERE'S YOUR HAT". Stack that on top of the fact that he hasn't arsed himself to drop in for over a year, until this shit started...
...What fucking conclusion am I SUPPOSED to draw?
Yeah, it's probably more valid a reading of it than mine, which is based on just the text out of the context you've got. Prepare butt peanuts for suction!
Maybe. I'm just not really willing to extend the benefit of the doubt, given the "several people" comment.
I'm a bit behind on this, maybe out of purpose, but...
Really the worst things you can do in an argument is say this mysterious numinous group of people whose names I won't mention agree that certain mysterious, numinous group of people are making the experience not worthwhile.
God knows I've had some cock ups here and there but they've always been direct, and I've admitted fault where fault was to be admitted. And I've had butthurt too.
I think the messed up thing about it is that you're drafting a legion of nameless ghosts. If your ghosts won't stand with you, why are you letting them speak?
That's a bit of fodder there.