Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Cain

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 1880
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: Hail scientific method
« on: Yesterday at 09:35:07 am »
Well, it may have taken forever for you to get here, but I'm glad that someone from the Timecube™ has finally started posting on this forum.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who was thinking this.

Clownfish are terrible.  Finding Nemo was just pure propaganda.

Aneristic Illusions / Re: Occupy
« on: March 27, 2015, 12:59:04 pm »
I suspect Tunney sympathised with the Stormcloaks.

There's more:

All men at least above 15 (or younger if very asocial) should live separately from women and children, on their own in small huts or studios, isolated from one another and scattered around so that women can keep an eye on them (they should never be in groups or packs, that would be illegal). So it would also be illegal for male adults to impose their presence on females, girls and children. Men would have to care for themselves on their own: food, laundry, etc. No male above his age of puberty would be allowed to receive any kind of service from a female. Their life expectancy would probably drop to the age of 40, but that’s how things should be. Women’s life expectancy without men would rise to 130 years at least.

PIV would be illegal too of course, as well as the initiation of any verbal or physical contact to women and girls or boy children, unless solicited by a woman for specific matters. I’m not sure what to do about boy children. Obviously you know my opinion, but let’s say that’s up to the mother to decide what she wants to do before he turns of age to leave the female family circle.
Does she want toxic masculinity? cuz this is how you get toxic masculinity. This setup wouldn't survive one month without a violent uprising. It's such a spiteful and neurotic form of fascism that it does even have the facade of efficiency and competence that the Nazis had.

Only because of the inherent violence of men.  Clearly gendercide is the better option.

Those swell, stand-up guys from the DEA are at it again:

In a scathing report from the US Justice Department, agents from the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) are accused of leaving their weapons in the hands of Colombian police so they could go have sex with the women.

Seven of the ten men accused admitted their role in the sex parties and were suspended from duty up to ten days before being allowed to return to work. The parties are alleged to have taken place over a three-year period between 2005 and 2008.

The report also alleges that three DEA supervisors were "provided money, expensive gifts, and weapons from drug cartel members".

The allegations are the latest in a long string of claims of misbehaviour by American law enforcement agents while stationed abroad.

Aneristic Illusions / Re: Occupy
« on: March 26, 2015, 09:57:28 pm »
In a desperate bid for relevance, Justine Tunney of "crowdsource a milita", self described "technofascist" fame has now jumped on the GamerGate bandwagon.  Using the Occupy Twitter account, no less




Let a million "it's about ethics in protesting about games while bankers steal the country from beneath our feet" memes flourish.

Procrastination over.  Found new subreddit to troll:

I'd procrastinate, but I really have to eat first.

Eating is for losers with skinny weiners.  Do you even fast, bro?

*carries on procrastinating*

Yeah, the radical end of radical feminism is all about this kind of stuff.  Sexual apartheid, all male sex is rape, "political lesbianism" and so on.  It's proven to be surprisingly durable on the web, perhaps thanks to the flipside of "Red Pill-ers" "Return of Kings" etc etc types, in addition to the web's own epistemic closure like properties.

Performing These Boots Are Made For Walkin'

Libety would be a great drag queen stage name.

This is one of those times when reading the comments is definitely recommended.

"to whom it may concern, I’m doing you a massive favour and being super nice in saying that i’m not publishing any comments which include the following:
“PIV as rape trivialises real rape victims”
and “but, but, I like sex and you’re insulting women or men who like sex”;
and “you’re just doing sex the wrong way”

naming violence doesn’t trivialise violence or victims of violence, it names violence. To be a rape victim isn’t a competitive elite oppressed status reserved to a special few women, which loses in specialness as the number of rape victims increases. All women are raped in patriarchy, even by non-radfem standards.

As to the last two points, this shows reading comprehension problems and I would ask you to re-read the post and comments with more attention as a reply has been provided. Please build on that."

I.... the fuck?

Lulz I'm a serial rapist, and all men are rapists until proven innocent. She wins the Garbo award of 2015.

Also, she defines rape very specifically as only having a female victim and a male perpetrator earlier in the comments, so if I tie down a dude, force feed him viagra, and have my terrible way with him, I'm a rape victim.


Well I'm glad to see we have at least defined away the problem of rape in male prisons.  Always pays to look on the bright side.


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 1880