http://scienceblogs.com/cognitivedaily/2009/01/would_we_still_obey_the_first.php#more
Â
So, it looks like ABC found a way to re-do the Milgram Experiment minus the shaky ethics.Â
Â
Has the human race evolved a compassion gland after 40 years? Perhaps the leaps in technology have taught humans that “just following orders” is a shitty excuse? Maybe, just maybe, people will reject a sadistic “authority” and think for themselves?
Â
Of course not. Just like last time, about 70% of the test subjects would willingly electrocute another human because they were told to.
Â
However, some other interesting things were learned:
Â
·                                The experimenters’ physical presence has a marked impact on his authority. As cited earlier, obedience dropped off sharply when orders were given by telephone. The experimenter could often induce a disobedient subject to go on by returning to the laboratory.
·                                Conflicting authority severely paralyzes action. When two experimenters of equal status, both seated at the command desk, gave incompatible orders, no shocks were delivered past the point of their disagreement.
·                                The rebellious action of others severely undermines authority. In one variation, three teachers (two actors and a real subject) administered a test and shocks. When the two actors disobeyed the experimenter and refused to go beyond a certain shock level, thirty-six of forty subjects joined their disobedient peers and refused as well.
“Perhaps only when rebels outnumber authority figures can disobedience readily spread.”
Â
That last line sounds important.Â