OFFICIAL POLITICAL CARTOONS/PIC FREAD.

[Telarus]

http://literallyunbelievable.org/

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

I love The Onion.

[Igor]

[Oysters Rockefeller]

I love how this ends on conservative men implying gay sex.

Or maybe thats just the far left indoctrination I've been exposed to at the local college.

[Epimetheus]

[Scribbly]

[Cain]

So....that's not actually photoshopped, is it?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

So....that's not actually photoshopped, is it?

Seems pretty par for the course.

[Telarus]

So....that's not actually photoshopped, is it?

It (probably) is, some-one on FB posted a link to the 'original' screencap.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

So....that's not actually photoshopped, is it?

It (probably) is, some-one on FB posted a link to the 'original' screencap.

The saddest thing is that even if it's shopped, it's in line enough with what I've come to expect that I didn't even question it.

[Elder Iptuous]

So....that's not actually photoshopped, is it?

It (probably) is, some-one on FB posted a link to the 'original' screencap.

The saddest thing is that even if it's shopped, it's in line enough with what I've come to expect that I didn't even question it.

Is it in line enough with actual verified examples that are this bad, or in line enough with how bad you want them to be?
(i honestly like the idea of a force of madmen that stupid and evil to rail against.  it feels good.)

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

So....that's not actually photoshopped, is it?

It (probably) is, some-one on FB posted a link to the 'original' screencap.

The saddest thing is that even if it's shopped, it's in line enough with what I've come to expect that I didn't even question it.

Is it in line enough with actual verified examples that are this bad, or in line enough with how bad you want them to be?
(i honestly like the idea of a force of madmen that stupid and evil to rail against.  it feels good.)

It's worse than any verified examples I've seen, but not so much worse that it triggered my skeptic reflex, if you know what I mean?

[Cain]

I could accept every error except "Tooloz" and "Crazy Buddhist Gunman".  If the city name had been spelt right, and they used the term "Sikh terrorist" or militant, then I might not have questioned it.

I mean, FOX are a crazy propaganda outfit, but they at least have access to dictionaries.  And probably know Buddhists disavow all kinds of violence (though the supposedly non-violent aspect of Buddhism is one Western adherents massively over-emphasize, especially when compared to the historical record, I wouldn't expect anyone at FOX to know that).  And would never turn up the chance to feed Islamophobic sentiment by blaming another religion.

[Doktor Howl]

Is it in line enough with actual verified examples that are this bad, or in line enough with how bad you want them to be?

Fuck that shit.  When Mark Foley got caught kiddy-fiddling, Fox listed him as "Mark Foley (D-FL)"

I mean, do you really have to ask?  Because I can find a shitload of things they've said that are dumber than what that pic alleges they said.

Jesus H Christ, I never thought we'd have a major media apologist in here, let alone one for Fox.

[Prince Glittersnatch III]

I hate to ruin everyone's fun but...



Oh wait, no I dont.

Cmon guys, the "Americas Election" square was a dead giveaway.