ITT: Best Posts of the Day

[AFK]

Without posting PMs(Thats against the rules right?) I asked RWHN if he would be upset about with the porn being posted and he basically told me to get lost without a yes or a no. I interpreted this as a signifying apathy.

I then asked him to clarify and he told me to get lost again, which I interpreted again as apathy.  Looking at the messages now I can see how I might have misunderstood them, and I am kind of sorry about that. I say kind of because I really dont see RWHN as the kind of thin skinned person who will be eternally traumatized by erotic literature staring him and Richard Nixon.

I would however, like to clarify that it was not a personal attack on him. It was an attempt to derail a horrible thread that centered primarily around him. I certainly dont "have it out for you", and if it makes you feel better I am willing to write fetish pornography involving your enemy and former president of choice.

My second message to you very clearly had the word "no" in it.  Read it again and tell me it isn't there.

I asked you if it would bother you.
You said, "get lost"
I asked if you meant yes by that, as in "yes that would bother me"
You said "No, get lost."
It was a mix up, I should have asked you to clarify more.

No, you asked me, "was that a yes?"


My response was:  "No.  Pound sand."


How did you "mix up" the word "no"?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Ohh nice.

You know when my TWELVE YEAR OLD student act like this we have the bullying talk.

I dunno it kinda feels that step too far. Im no fan.

Dude, let them have their fun, I'm no worse for wear. 


I knew when Glitterpuss PM'd me and asked me if he could do this and I told him "No" and to buzz off, he was going to do it anyway. That tells you a lot about the quality of a person, doesn't it?


The need and desire to be accepted creates some very strong gravity.

Sorry, I left my fucking mind lazors on.  It is of course impossible that he simply wanted to do it on his own.  Because there's people - like you - and there's robots, like everyone else.

Right?

Come on, Roger, everyone knows that everything we do, we do it all for you. It's a truth as self-evident as the fact that I am an angry mob prone to ganging up on people out of the blue for no reason whatsoever.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

So do you approve of what he did?  Just curious.  I mean if I privately asked you if I could use your name in a graphic pun, and you said no, and I did it anyway....would you be okay with that?

If you used my PD name?  No, I don't think I'd get too pissed.

Bullshit!  Exhibit A, the "Nazi" fiasco at EB&G.  The implications of me in a triste w/Nixon are pretty clear and is a commentary on my character.  You damn well would be pissed if someone did that to you, and you were when it happened at EB&G.  Nice consistency there bub.

If it's any consolation, I still think you're a bad person and if what I devote my life to has any one effect on public policy, I hope it's to eliminate your job and all the jobs of people like you.

I don't often say that someone is simply a bad person because I don't think that most people are, but I think you are. You and Babs. Same exact category, and for the same exact reason; because you honestly don't see any harm in the incredibly destructive policies/belief system you support and perpetuate. My only consolation is that I suspect you heavily exaggerate your level of influence, but it's small consolation indeed because the people who actually do have influence want exactly the same thing you want, which is to "intervene" by sending more children to prison for a paycheck.

Babylon is a relatively harmless bad guy. You, on the other  hand, are not, and the harm you do to our society directly involves children, which, were I not opposed to corporal punishment in any way other than metaphorically, I would love to have you strung up and hamstrung.

[LMNO]

Wait... where did he say he wants to put kids in jail?  As far as I know, he has stated more than once that he believes kids should not get a prison record for drug offences... right?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

I thought that porn was funny.

I thought it was fucking hilarious.

Don't get me wrong; I would be livid if someone posted scat porn of me slavishy sucking off the cock of the oligarchy like a cringing establishment toady.

But it was such an apt metaphor.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Without posting PMs(Thats against the rules right?) I asked RWHN if he would be upset about with the porn being posted and he basically told me to get lost without a yes or a no. I interpreted this as a signifying apathy.

I then asked him to clarify and he told me to get lost again, which I interpreted again as apathy.  Looking at the messages now I can see how I might have misunderstood them, and I am kind of sorry about that. I say kind of because I really dont see RWHN as the kind of thin skinned person who will be eternally traumatized by erotic literature staring him and Richard Nixon.

I would however, like to clarify that it was not a personal attack on him. It was an attempt to derail a horrible thread that centered primarily around him. I certainly dont "have it out for you", and if it makes you feel better I am willing to write fetish pornography involving your enemy and former president of choice.

OMG OMG OMG

You should do me and Jimmy Carter.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Without posting PMs(Thats against the rules right?) I asked RWHN if he would be upset about with the porn being posted and he basically told me to get lost without a yes or a no. I interpreted this as a signifying apathy.

I then asked him to clarify and he told me to get lost again, which I interpreted again as apathy.  Looking at the messages now I can see how I might have misunderstood them, and I am kind of sorry about that. I say kind of because I really dont see RWHN as the kind of thin skinned person who will be eternally traumatized by erotic literature staring him and Richard Nixon.

I would however, like to clarify that it was not a personal attack on him. It was an attempt to derail a horrible thread that centered primarily around him. I certainly dont "have it out for you", and if it makes you feel better I am willing to write fetish pornography involving your enemy and former president of choice.

I DEMAND sexy tiem with Richard Nixon.  And FAST, before Nigel finds out...Or I'll NEVER get any of that sweet jowly-loving.

STEP OFF, BITCH, NIXON'S MINE! 

[tyrannosaurus vex]

I thought that porn was funny.

I thought it was fucking hilarious.

Don't get me wrong; I would be livid if someone posted scat porn of me slavishy sucking off the cock of the oligarchy like a cringing establishment toady.

But it was such an apt metaphor.

Now that this image is just in my head, I'm gonna go ahead and take a vow of celibacy and move to a Buddhist monastery. RWHN scat porn is hilarious, but Nigel scat porn is too tragic to exist at all, even as an empty theoretical.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Wait... where did he say he wants to put kids in jail?  As far as I know, he has stated more than once that he believes kids should not get a prison record for drug offences... right?

He says he doesn't want kids to go to jail, but he supports drug dog searches in schools.

So, SAYING that he doesn't want kids to go to jail is kind of contradicted by his support of a policy that sends kids to jail. In the meantime, he also doesn't seem to have a problem with adult lives (and the lives of their families) being destroyed, because "they knew it was illegal and they chose to do it anyway".

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

I thought that porn was funny.

I thought it was fucking hilarious.

Don't get me wrong; I would be livid if someone posted scat porn of me slavishy sucking off the cock of the oligarchy like a cringing establishment toady.

But it was such an apt metaphor.

Now that this image is just in my head, I'm gonna go ahead and take a vow of celibacy and move to a Buddhist monastery. RWHN scat porn is hilarious, but Nigel scat porn is too tragic to exist at all, even as an empty theoretical.

Someone should do it, and it should be racist, sexist, and debasing, just so we can say it's been done.

[Salty]

I just want to say I do not understand how it's gotten this way with RWHN. I spent the last two years working for a company that systematically fucks every last one of you every single day and making A LOT of money* doing it.

Some of us work for companies that do the same. Companies that cause real and very serious harm to people all over the world. I refuse to believe that RWHN ALL BY HIS LITTLE SELF is destroying America's children. And I don't understand how you people are taking what mostly amounts to a theoretical discussion and turning a very thoughtful articulate person into some kind of comic book super villain. It's fucking stupid.



*a good deal of which was spent on drugs.

[Salty]

I ALSO think GlitterS. story was purely in jest. And I think there's something in Discordian lit. RE: jesting.

Shit, soon people may start putting pics of one another's faces on awkward/degradig photographs for the purpose of amusement and to break up cycles of stupid. Better hide the keys.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Without posting PMs(Thats against the rules right?) I asked RWHN if he would be upset about with the porn being posted and he basically told me to get lost without a yes or a no. I interpreted this as a signifying apathy.

I then asked him to clarify and he told me to get lost again, which I interpreted again as apathy.  Looking at the messages now I can see how I might have misunderstood them, and I am kind of sorry about that. I say kind of because I really dont see RWHN as the kind of thin skinned person who will be eternally traumatized by erotic literature staring him and Richard Nixon.

I would however, like to clarify that it was not a personal attack on him. It was an attempt to derail a horrible thread that centered primarily around him. I certainly dont "have it out for you", and if it makes you feel better I am willing to write fetish pornography involving your enemy and former president of choice.

My second message to you very clearly had the word "no" in it.  Read it again and tell me it isn't there.

I asked you if it would bother you.
You said, "get lost"
I asked if you meant yes by that, as in "yes that would bother me"
You said "No, get lost."
It was a mix up, I should have asked you to clarify more.

No, you asked me, "was that a yes?"


My response was:  "No.  Pound sand."


How did you "mix up" the word "no"?

Dude, he asked if it would bother you, and you told him to pound sand. He then asked "Was that a yes?" and you replied "No". Which I think many reasonable people would read as "No, it would not bother me". You're really just owning the shit out of yourself with this one.

[Don Coyote]

I ALSO think GlitterS. story was purely in jest. And I think there's something in Discordian lit. RE: jesting.

Shit, soon people may start putting pics of one another's faces on awkward/degradig photographs for the purpose of amusement and to break up cycles of stupid. Better hide the keys.

Are you saying that illustrations of scat porn are needed?

[Prince Glittersnatch III]

I ALSO think GlitterS. story was purely in jest. And I think there's something in Discordian lit. RE: jesting.

Shit, soon people may start putting pics of one another's faces on awkward/degradig photographs for the purpose of amusement and to break up cycles of stupid. Better hide the keys.

Are you saying that illustrations of scat porn are needed?

Lets hope it never comes to that.