News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Success of some religious memes versus others...

Started by Kurt Christ, October 13, 2008, 11:34:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jasper

It's more of a logic puzzle than a sociological model. 

Cain

Quote from: Felix on October 16, 2008, 07:41:34 AM
It's more of a logic puzzle than a sociological model. 

BZZZZZZZT!  Back of the class.

Game Theory is one of the very first theories you learn in the social sciences.  Among other things, its application was in the use of US nuclear strategy in the Cold War.  Game theory attempts to mathematically capture behavior in strategic situations, in which an individual's success in making choices depends on the choices of others.

RB, it may not surprise you to learn that Game Theory was massively advanced by a paranoid schizophrenic who suffered from clinical depression.  Thus its underlying philosophical premises are somewhat suspect, to say the least.

Cramulus

Quote from: Rabid Badger of God on October 16, 2008, 01:22:14 AM
Quote from: Cramulus on October 16, 2008, 01:08:20 AM

This was explored in the literature on the Prisoner's Dilemma. The basic question is, "How can co-operation emerge among rational, self-interested individuals without there being any form of central authority imposed on them?" Hofstadter wrote a lot about this, and it left a big mark on me when I first read about it.



That whole dilemma seems weird and artificial to me. 

Yeah, the scenario is kind of unreal. but the core idea:

cooperate? or fuck over everyone but me?

comes up pretty often

Rococo Modem Basilisk

I read about an example in buddhism. Zen never caught on in china because it was followed up by another sect, that taught that if you spoke a certain mantra at any time, you automatically were saved. That's SO much easier than meditating for years and getting hit with sticks to attain enlightenment.


I am not "full of hate" as if I were some passive container. I am a generator of hate, and my rage is a renewable resource, like sunshine.