News:

Endorsement:  I am not convinced you even understand my concepts of moral relativity, so perhaps it would be best for you not to approach them.

Main Menu

Teabaggers take over 23rd District race from GOP

Started by Cain, November 02, 2009, 09:53:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

The Good Reverend Roger

#15
November 04, 2009, 08:58:49 PM
Quote from: Nigel on November 04, 2009, 08:17:34 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache on November 04, 2009, 05:40:35 PM
Quote# A child born in the United States to non-citizens is not a citizen.
I'd love to see them change the Constitution for that one. I don't think they'd get much traction for a Repeal the 14th Amendment movement.

I wonder if they've considered what would happen if it was not only repealed, but the repeal was made retroactive...

Even if it only covers the current generation, I would lose my citizenship, despite a decade of service in the army.  :)

TGRR,
Born in Michigan, of two Canuckistanis.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

#16
November 05, 2009, 12:06:15 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 04, 2009, 08:58:49 PM
Quote from: Nigel on November 04, 2009, 08:17:34 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache on November 04, 2009, 05:40:35 PM
Quote# A child born in the United States to non-citizens is not a citizen.
I'd love to see them change the Constitution for that one. I don't think they'd get much traction for a Repeal the 14th Amendment movement.

I wonder if they've considered what would happen if it was not only repealed, but the repeal was made retroactive...

Even if it only covers the current generation, I would lose my citizenship, despite a decade of service in the army.  :)

TGRR,
Born in Michigan, of two Canuckistanis.

It would be fun to watch them struggle to find a way of saying "Oh but it doesn't apply to white people" without actually saying it.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."

Iason Ouabache

#17
November 05, 2009, 12:37:19 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 04, 2009, 06:03:18 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache link=topic=22779.msg773751#msg773751
Quote# A child born in the United States to non-citizens is not a citizen.
I'd love to see them change the Constitution for that one. I don't think they'd get much traction for a Repeal the 14th Amendment movement.

Well, helllllloooooooo, Jim Crow!   :lulz:
It must be a law that every single political party has to opposed to at least one Constitutional amendment without actually coming out and saying that we need to amend the Constitution. For instance: Conservative Party - 14th amendment. Constitution Party (lol!) 1st Amendment. Libertarian Party - 16th amendment. Republican party - 4th amendment. Democratic party - 2nd amendment?
You cannot fathom the immensity of the fuck i do not give.
    \
┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘

Cain

#18
November 05, 2009, 08:57:21 AM
The Dems don't seem too keen on the 4th Ammendment either. Drug war, and all that (I know the GOP did it in, but that was with legislation that was drafted during the Clinton years, with his approval).

Also, I shit you not, Erick Erickson of RedState said this once the election was over:

QuoteThe race has now been called for Democrat Bill Owens.

This is a huge win for conservatives.

The problem is, all snark aside, he is kinda right.  The Movement showed they were willing to pout and not play along, and as a result, the GOP lost.  They may have lost anyway, given the all time low approval ratings of the Republican party, but we wont know that now, since the lunatic fringe decided on an all out assault on the GOP candidate.

The moderates are now put in a very tough position.  Be purged, or attempt to purge first.  The latter doesn't seem too possible, given their numbers and lack of organization, so chances are it will be the former, and they will defect to the Democrats, dragging its policies (further) to the right.

The Good Reverend Roger

#19
November 05, 2009, 02:18:33 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache on November 05, 2009, 12:37:19 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 04, 2009, 06:03:18 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache link=topic=22779.msg773751#msg773751
Quote# A child born in the United States to non-citizens is not a citizen.
I'd love to see them change the Constitution for that one. I don't think they'd get much traction for a Repeal the 14th Amendment movement.

Well, helllllloooooooo, Jim Crow!   :lulz:
It must be a law that every single political party has to opposed to at least one Constitutional amendment without actually coming out and saying that we need to amend the Constitution. For instance: Conservative Party - 14th amendment. Constitution Party (lol!) 1st Amendment. Libertarian Party - 16th amendment. Republican party - 4th amendment. Democratic party - 2nd amendment?

TGRR Party:  Article II.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

The Good Reverend Roger

#20
November 05, 2009, 02:19:45 PM
Quote from: Nigel on November 05, 2009, 12:06:15 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 04, 2009, 08:58:49 PM
Quote from: Nigel on November 04, 2009, 08:17:34 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache on November 04, 2009, 05:40:35 PM
Quote# A child born in the United States to non-citizens is not a citizen.
I'd love to see them change the Constitution for that one. I don't think they'd get much traction for a Repeal the 14th Amendment movement.

I wonder if they've considered what would happen if it was not only repealed, but the repeal was made retroactive...

Even if it only covers the current generation, I would lose my citizenship, despite a decade of service in the army.  :)

TGRR,
Born in Michigan, of two Canuckistanis.

It would be fun to watch them struggle to find a way of saying "Oh but it doesn't apply to white people" without actually saying it.

:lulz:

QUIT READING MY MIND!  :crankey:

:lulz:
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LMNO

#21
November 05, 2009, 02:20:03 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 05, 2009, 02:18:33 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache on November 05, 2009, 12:37:19 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 04, 2009, 06:03:18 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache link=topic=22779.msg773751#msg773751
Quote# A child born in the United States to non-citizens is not a citizen.
I'd love to see them change the Constitution for that one. I don't think they'd get much traction for a Repeal the 14th Amendment movement.

Well, helllllloooooooo, Jim Crow!   :lulz:
It must be a law that every single political party has to opposed to at least one Constitutional amendment without actually coming out and saying that we need to amend the Constitution. For instance: Conservative Party - 14th amendment. Constitution Party (lol!) 1st Amendment. Libertarian Party - 16th amendment. Republican party - 4th amendment. Democratic party - 2nd amendment?

TGRR Party:  Article II.

I'd vote for you.

The Good Reverend Roger

#22
November 05, 2009, 02:21:27 PM
Quote from: LMNO on November 05, 2009, 02:20:03 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 05, 2009, 02:18:33 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache on November 05, 2009, 12:37:19 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 04, 2009, 06:03:18 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache link=topic=22779.msg773751#msg773751
Quote# A child born in the United States to non-citizens is not a citizen.
I'd love to see them change the Constitution for that one. I don't think they'd get much traction for a Repeal the 14th Amendment movement.

Well, helllllloooooooo, Jim Crow!   :lulz:
It must be a law that every single political party has to opposed to at least one Constitutional amendment without actually coming out and saying that we need to amend the Constitution. For instance: Conservative Party - 14th amendment. Constitution Party (lol!) 1st Amendment. Libertarian Party - 16th amendment. Republican party - 4th amendment. Democratic party - 2nd amendment?

TGRR Party:  Article II.

I'd vote for you.

Inauguration speech:  "I just abolished myself via executive order.  Now all you fucking yahoos go get a goddamn job".
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LMNO

#23
November 05, 2009, 02:30:57 PM
 :lulz:
:mittens:

Template

#24
December 01, 2009, 10:43:44 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 05, 2009, 02:21:27 PM
Quote from: LMNO on November 05, 2009, 02:20:03 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 05, 2009, 02:18:33 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache on November 05, 2009, 12:37:19 AM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 04, 2009, 06:03:18 PM
Quote from: Iason Ouabache link=topic=22779.msg773751#msg773751
Quote# A child born in the United States to non-citizens is not a citizen.
I'd love to see them change the Constitution for that one. I don't think they'd get much traction for a Repeal the 14th Amendment movement.

Well, helllllloooooooo, Jim Crow!   :lulz:
It must be a law that every single political party has to opposed to at least one Constitutional amendment without actually coming out and saying that we need to amend the Constitution. For instance: Conservative Party - 14th amendment. Constitution Party (lol!) 1st Amendment. Libertarian Party - 16th amendment. Republican party - 4th amendment. Democratic party - 2nd amendment?

TGRR Party:  Article II.

I'd vote for you.

Inauguration speech:  "I just abolished myself via executive order.  Now all you fucking yahoos go get a goddamn job".

:lulz: :lulz:
:mittens:
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions