News:

Urgh, this is what I hate about PD.com, it is the only site in existence where a perfectly good spam thread can be misused for high quality discussions.  I hate you all.

Main Menu

Voldemort Patents Podcasting

Started by Iason Ouabache, November 20, 2009, 09:49:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Iason Ouabache

http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/11/eff-tackles-bogus-podcasting-patent-and-we-need-yo

QuotePatenting podcasting? You've got to be kidding. Yet a company called Volomedia just got the Patent Office to grant them such exclusive rights.

EFF and the law firm of Howrey, LLP aren't willing to just sit by and watch. This patent could threaten the vibrant community of podcasters and millions of podcast listeners. We want to put a stop to it, but we need your help.

The Volomedia patent covers "a method for providing episodic media." It's a ridiculously broad patent, covering something that many folks have been doing for many years. Worse, it could create a whole new layer of ongoing costs for podcasters and their listeners. Right now, just about anyone can create their own on-demand talk radio program, earning an audience on the strength of their ideas. But more costs and hassle means that podcasting could go the way of mainstream radio -- with only the big guys able to afford an audience. And we'd have a bogus patent to blame.
You cannot fathom the immensity of the fuck i do not give.
    \
┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘

Jasper

Good luck controlling "a method" for providing "episodic media".

I'm getting the urge to patent "a method" for "defrauding the patent office".

Cain

I am patenting vlogging.

ALL YOUR VIDEO ARE BELONG TO ME.

Iason Ouabache

Quote from: Felix on November 20, 2009, 11:33:06 PM
Good luck controlling "a method" for providing "episodic media".

I'm getting the urge to patent "a method" for "defrauding the patent office".
There's no way that this is enforceable and EFF is already looking for "prior art" so that they can get this thing busted. It was a jackass move by the company and the patent board shouldn't have approved it in the first place.
You cannot fathom the immensity of the fuck i do not give.
    \
┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘┌( ಠ_ಠ)┘

Jasper

I have difficulty imagining a group of reasonably sane people got together to make a decision and came to that conclusion.

So I think it was a matter of bribery.

Makes sense.  A bribery is just an investment of a sort, and it stood to pay off pretty well.

Triple Zero

Quote from: Felix on November 21, 2009, 07:42:24 PM
I have difficulty imagining a group of reasonably sane people

I feel ya, man.
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

Jasper

Quote from: Triple Zero on November 21, 2009, 09:24:56 PM
Quote from: Felix on November 21, 2009, 07:42:24 PM
I have difficulty imagining a group of reasonably sane people

I feel ya, man.

Heh.  When I say "reasonably sane", of course I mean "garden variety fucked inna head".

Requia ☣

Quote from: Iason Ouabache on November 21, 2009, 07:32:58 PM
Quote from: Felix on November 20, 2009, 11:33:06 PM
Good luck controlling "a method" for providing "episodic media".

I'm getting the urge to patent "a method" for "defrauding the patent office".
There's no way that this is enforceable and EFF is already looking for "prior art" so that they can get this thing busted. It was a jackass move by the company and the patent board shouldn't have approved it in the first place.

It doesn't need to be enforceable,  a patent suit costs an average of 5 million, they'll sue and offer a smaller settlement a few hundred thousand to a million.

Also, east Texas judges would *totally* uphold that patent.
Inflatable dolls are not recognized flotation devices.