News:

TESTAMONIAL:  "I was still a bit rattled by the spectacular devastation."

Main Menu

Lewis Carroll: WOMAN

Started by Cramulus, April 14, 2010, 08:49:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Faust

Quote from: Cramulus on April 15, 2010, 12:50:20 AM
Quote from: Faust on April 15, 2010, 12:47:42 AM
Wasn't he the one who has gang raped by four boys in his boarding school? Not that that necessarily has any impact on him being a paedophile or not.

a surprising number of literary figures were gangbang victims

Between that and the serial killer targeting bad fiction writers such as Robert jordan & David Gemmell just as they get to the final book in their series, writers really have it hard.
Sleepless nights at the chateau

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Faust on April 15, 2010, 12:47:42 AM
Wasn't he the one who has gang raped by four boys in his boarding school? Not that that necessarily has any impact on him being a paedophile or not.

He did hate boarding school and vaguely alluded to being bothered by "nighttime disturbances", which many have speculated were some kind of sexual abuse.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


BADGE OF HONOR

I can't imagine being in an all-boys boarding school during that time could have been fun no matter whether there was sexual abuse.
The Jerk On Bike rolled his eyes and tossed the waffle back over his shoulder--before it struck the ground, a stout, disconcertingly monkey-like dog sprang into the air and snatched it, and began to masticate it--literally--for the sound it made was like a homonculus squatting on the floor muttering "masticate masticate masticate".

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: BADGE OF HONOR on April 15, 2010, 02:27:39 AM
I can't imagine being in an all-boys boarding school during that time could have been fun no matter whether there was sexual abuse.

Eeek, I know. But people have really fixated on Lewis Carroll over the years, ascribing all kinds of weird motivations/experiences to him which there isn't any evidence of really. I think it's because of the holy shit WHOA TRIPPY nature of Alice In Wonderland; they just didn't get it, and, as is normal for our species, felt the need to believe him a deviant freak because the idea that a normal person could produce a piece of writing that out there really messes with our minds.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Cramulus

you have to admit though, the imagery in his fiction is consistent with the profile of a forced figging victim.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Cramulus on April 15, 2010, 03:04:09 AM
you have to admit though, the imagery in his fiction is consistent with the profile of a forced figging victim.

:lulz:
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


notathing

Quote from: Cramulus on April 14, 2010, 08:58:25 PM
Once you detect this custom of renaming yourself to obfuscate your identity, you start to see it everywhere...


zerogravitytits   george washington was an obsessive washer
zerogravitytits   also, a hemp smoker
Idem   jane austen is really a city

JAMES GARFIELD IS REALLY A CAT

Idem   abe lincoln is really a toy
Payne   GEORGE BUSH IS REALLY AN UNTRIMMED PUBIC HAIRS





i love this  :horrormirth: :horrormirth: :horrormirth: :horrormirth:


moar

Lies

Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on April 14, 2010, 09:14:54 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on April 14, 2010, 08:53:16 PM
How does him being a pedophile fit into this?

I really don't think he was. There is, as many people have pointed out, no evidence that he molested or was even sexually attracted to little girls, and some evidence that his "indiscretions" tended to be adulterous, which would have been a great deal more scandalous at the time.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/07/books/the-close-reader-what-was-on-lewis-carroll-s-mind.html?pagewanted=1

No evidence huh? At all? huh?



Hmm.
- So the New World Order does not actually exist?
- Oh it exists, and how!
Ask the slaves whose labour built the White House;
Ask the slaves of today tied down to sweatshops and brothels to escape hunger;
Ask most women, second class citizens, in a pervasive rape culture;
Ask the non-human creatures who inhabit the planet:
whales, bears, frogs, tuna, bees, slaughtered farm animals;
Ask the natives of the Americas and Australia on whose land
you live today, on whose graves your factories, farms and neighbourhoods stand;
ask any of them this, ask them if the New World Order is true;
they'll tell you plainly: the New World Order... is you!

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Lysergic on April 15, 2010, 07:26:58 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on April 14, 2010, 09:14:54 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on April 14, 2010, 08:53:16 PM
How does him being a pedophile fit into this?

I really don't think he was. There is, as many people have pointed out, no evidence that he molested or was even sexually attracted to little girls, and some evidence that his "indiscretions" tended to be adulterous, which would have been a great deal more scandalous at the time.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/07/books/the-close-reader-what-was-on-lewis-carroll-s-mind.html?pagewanted=1

No evidence huh? At all? huh?



Hmm.

Obvious shoop is obvious.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Lies

#24
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on April 15, 2010, 08:14:13 AM
Quote from: Lysergic on April 15, 2010, 07:26:58 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on April 14, 2010, 09:14:54 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on April 14, 2010, 08:53:16 PM
How does him being a pedophile fit into this?

I really don't think he was. There is, as many people have pointed out, no evidence that he molested or was even sexually attracted to little girls, and some evidence that his "indiscretions" tended to be adulterous, which would have been a great deal more scandalous at the time.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/07/books/the-close-reader-what-was-on-lewis-carroll-s-mind.html?pagewanted=1

No evidence huh? At all? huh?



Hmm.

Obvious shoop is obvious.
Yeah, keep telling yourself that, it will make the pain of the horrible truth easier to handle.

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1142/was-lewis-carroll-a-perv

QuoteIn 1880 Dodgson gave up photography forever. Too much heat? Nobody knows, although around the same time he got flak for kissing one of his girl friends. At any rate the nude photos and plates were returned to the families of the subjects or destroyed on his death. It was long thought that none survived.

But then four turned up. For this we can thank Morton Cohen, who unearthed the photos and published them in his Lewis Carroll: A Biography (1995). One is of a little girl named Evelyn Hatch in a pose that, were Evelyn older or Cecil weirder, would be seductive. As it is I can imagine Evelyn's parents thinking: that Rev. Dodgson, he is one amusing fellow. But he'd better keep his mitts to himself.
- So the New World Order does not actually exist?
- Oh it exists, and how!
Ask the slaves whose labour built the White House;
Ask the slaves of today tied down to sweatshops and brothels to escape hunger;
Ask most women, second class citizens, in a pervasive rape culture;
Ask the non-human creatures who inhabit the planet:
whales, bears, frogs, tuna, bees, slaughtered farm animals;
Ask the natives of the Americas and Australia on whose land
you live today, on whose graves your factories, farms and neighbourhoods stand;
ask any of them this, ask them if the New World Order is true;
they'll tell you plainly: the New World Order... is you!

the last yatto


dont some people even believe the Shroud of Turin  is really just a early photocopy of someone's face
Look, asshole:  Your 'incomprehensible' act, your word-salad, your pinealism...It BORES ME.  I've been incomprehensible for so long, I TEACH IT TO MBA CANDIDATES.  So if you simply MUST talk about your pineal gland or happy children dancing in the wildflowers, go talk to Roger, because he digs that kind of shit

Triple Zero

Quote from: Cramulus on April 15, 2010, 12:50:20 AM
Quote from: Faust on April 15, 2010, 12:47:42 AM
Wasn't he the one who has gang raped by four boys in his boarding school? Not that that necessarily has any impact on him being a paedophile or not.

a surprising number of literary figures were gangbang victims

It used to be part of the curriculum, a prerequisite for literacy. Called "dipping the quill". It was in fact an early 20th century Russian behavioural scientist named P. Komstokdan conducting controversial experiments involving mental patients and, for some reason, horses, who demonstrated the lack of educational value of this time-worn practice.
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

Bebek Sincap Ratatosk

And Lewis Carroll (or Carol Lewis) was also, Jack the Ripper.According the the well respected Spag/Ripperologist* Richard Wallace, he hid anagrams proving that Carroll admitted to being the 'orrible serial killer. Strong evidence like:

Quote'So she wondered away, through the wood, carrying the ugly little thing with her. And a great job it was to keep hold of it, it wriggled about so. But at last she found out that the proper way was to keep tight hold of itself foot and its right ear'.  - Nursery Alice

When correctly translated is obviously:
Quote'She wriggled about so! But at last Dodgson and Bayne found a way to keep hold of the fat little whore. I got a tight hold of her and slit her throat, left ear to right. It was tough, wet, disgusting, too. So weary of it, they threw up - jack the Ripper.'













* :lulz:
- I don't see race. I just see cars going around in a circle.

"Back in my day, crazy meant something. Now everyone is crazy" - Charlie Manson

hooplala

Quote from: Cramulus on April 15, 2010, 03:04:09 AM
you have to admit though, the imagery in his fiction is consistent with the profile of a forced figging victim.

True, look what it did to Aini.   :fap:
"Soon all of us will have special names" — Professor Brian O'Blivion

"Now's not the time to get silly, so wear your big boots and jump on the garbage clowns." — Bob Dylan?

"Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)"
— Walt Whitman

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Lysergic on April 15, 2010, 08:58:13 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on April 15, 2010, 08:14:13 AM
Quote from: Lysergic on April 15, 2010, 07:26:58 AM
Quote from: The Right Reverend Nigel on April 14, 2010, 09:14:54 PM
Quote from: Hoopla on April 14, 2010, 08:53:16 PM
How does him being a pedophile fit into this?

I really don't think he was. There is, as many people have pointed out, no evidence that he molested or was even sexually attracted to little girls, and some evidence that his "indiscretions" tended to be adulterous, which would have been a great deal more scandalous at the time.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/07/books/the-close-reader-what-was-on-lewis-carroll-s-mind.html?pagewanted=1

No evidence huh? At all? huh?



Hmm.

Obvious shoop is obvious.
Yeah, keep telling yourself that, it will make the pain of the horrible truth easier to handle.

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/1142/was-lewis-carroll-a-perv

QuoteIn 1880 Dodgson gave up photography forever. Too much heat? Nobody knows, although around the same time he got flak for kissing one of his girl friends. At any rate the nude photos and plates were returned to the families of the subjects or destroyed on his death. It was long thought that none survived.

But then four turned up. For this we can thank Morton Cohen, who unearthed the photos and published them in his Lewis Carroll: A Biography (1995). One is of a little girl named Evelyn Hatch in a pose that, were Evelyn older or Cecil weirder, would be seductive. As it is I can imagine Evelyn's parents thinking: that Rev. Dodgson, he is one amusing fellow. But he'd better keep his mitts to himself.

Lys, I can't tell if you're playing straight man, or if you're serious. Carroll's nudes of little girls are well-known, there are are scholarly analyses of him and his work that are far more educational (and accurate) than some guy named Cecil on a website.

Also,



Duh.



"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."