REEFER MADNESS!!!!!!

[Bebek Sincap Ratatosk]

 

[The Good Reverend Roger]

That's what I thought at first, too.   

[Dysfunctional Cunt]

I love the purple troll guy!!!  

He makes me happy!!

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

I still find your whole idea of "gotcha journalism" having anything to do with message boards pretty laughable.

"I WAS CORNERED ON THE INTERNET!"
  \

Laugh all you want, you're still the only one who couldn't make the connection.

I asked not because I didn't understand, but why you thought that was relevant to a debate on the internet.

I'm honestly puzzled, here.  Net is claiming that ambush-style questions are never used on the internet?

Could you give me an example?

No, I think I'd rather just laugh at you.  Like this ---> 

This is the most RIDICULOUS case of heel entrenching I've EVER seen on PD.  Congratulations...It's not every day that you see someone deny the existence of one of the best trolling techniques ever devised.

Well, I'm convinced.

I'm just quivering with fear about getting ambushed by a question on a message board now.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I still find your whole idea of "gotcha journalism" having anything to do with message boards pretty laughable.

"I WAS CORNERED ON THE INTERNET!"
  \

Laugh all you want, you're still the only one who couldn't make the connection.

I asked not because I didn't understand, but why you thought that was relevant to a debate on the internet.

I'm honestly puzzled, here.  Net is claiming that ambush-style questions are never used on the internet?

Could you give me an example?

No, I think I'd rather just laugh at you.  Like this ---> 

This is the most RIDICULOUS case of heel entrenching I've EVER seen on PD.  Congratulations...It's not every day that you see someone deny the existence of one of the best trolling techniques ever devised.

Well, I'm convinced.

I'm just quivering with fear about getting ambushed by a question on a message board now.

Tell me, Net...Does Socratic trolling exist, or is that only IRL, too?

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Well, I have a meeting to attend, so I guess I'll miss "the big reveal".  Shame, that.

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

I still find your whole idea of "gotcha journalism" having anything to do with message boards pretty laughable.

"I WAS CORNERED ON THE INTERNET!"
  \

Laugh all you want, you're still the only one who couldn't make the connection.

I asked not because I didn't understand, but why you thought that was relevant to a debate on the internet.

I'm honestly puzzled, here.  Net is claiming that ambush-style questions are never used on the internet?

Could you give me an example?

No, I think I'd rather just laugh at you.  Like this ---> 

This is the most RIDICULOUS case of heel entrenching I've EVER seen on PD.  Congratulations...It's not every day that you see someone deny the existence of one of the best trolling techniques ever devised.

Well, I'm convinced.

I'm just quivering with fear about getting ambushed by a question on a message board now.

Tell me, Net...Does Socratic trolling exist, or is that only IRL, too?

AMBUSH!

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

These are not the questions we agreed to before the interview!

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Remember, kids!  If it doesn't bother Net, it doesn't exist! 

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

Remember, kids!  If it doesn't bother Net, it doesn't exist! 

I DID NOT HAVE A CHANCE TO PREPARE FOR THESE QUESTIONS!

I'M SO EMBARRASSED!

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Remember, kids!  If it doesn't bother Net, it doesn't exist! 

I DID NOT HAVE A CHANCE TO PREPARE FOR THESE QUESTIONS!

I'M SO EMBARRASSED!

How very Net of you to ignore the rest of the Wikipedia link.  You know, the several other things that qualify as "Gotcha Questions".  I'd say I'm shocked, but I'm not.  This is pretty much what you do.

I mean, besides ruin funny threads with cheap, passive-aggressive insults because you just can't get over an argument that happened three years ago.

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

Remember, kids!  If it doesn't bother Net, it doesn't exist! 

I DID NOT HAVE A CHANCE TO PREPARE FOR THESE QUESTIONS!

I'M SO EMBARRASSED!

How very Net of you to ignore the rest of the Wikipedia link.  You know, the several other things that qualify as "Gotcha Questions".  I'd say I'm shocked, but I'm not.  This is pretty much what you do.

I mean, besides ruin funny threads with cheap, passive-aggressive insults because you just can't get over an argument that happened three years ago.

You ignored my request for a simple example, so why shouldn't I reciprocate?

I have no idea who or what you're talking about with this "passive-aggressive insults" stuff.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

You ignored my request for a simple example, so why shouldn't I reciprocate?

Yeah, I did.  The link LMNO provided was more than adequate to describe what he was talking about, and unrehearsed questions are not the only definition given.  So either you decided to derail LMNO for no reason whatsoever, or you're an idiot.  Which is it?

I have no idea who or what you're talking about with this "passive-aggressive insults" stuff.

Of course you don't, Sparky.   

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

You ignored my request for a simple example, so why shouldn't I reciprocate?

Yeah, I did.  The link LMNO provided was more than adequate to describe what he was talking about, and unrehearsed questions are not the only definition given.  So either you decided to derail LMNO for no reason whatsoever, or you're an idiot.  Which is it?

Or it's ridiculous to compare a reporter's interview with a debate on a message board.

Especially THIS message board.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

You ignored my request for a simple example, so why shouldn't I reciprocate?

Yeah, I did.  The link LMNO provided was more than adequate to describe what he was talking about, and unrehearsed questions are not the only definition given.  So either you decided to derail LMNO for no reason whatsoever, or you're an idiot.  Which is it?

Or it's ridiculous to compare a reporter's interview with a debate on a message board.

Especially THIS message board.

So I'll just put you down as "pointlessly malicious", then.

Fits with your normal behavior.