Hipsters fucking love the hurdy-gurdy

[Doktor Howl]

That may be so, however your logic dictates that only a hipster can recognize another hipster. By your logic, you would be unable to know that I have a beard.
Or that if you pass by a furry convention, you wouldn't know that they were furries.

....um. No. Unless you are positing that if it takes a hipster to know a hipster, therefore only like can recognize like applies universally to everything.

How are you at math? Not so good? 

He's majoring in Celt.  So no.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

That may be so, however your logic dictates that only a hipster can recognize another hipster. By your logic, you would be unable to know that I have a beard.
Or that if you pass by a furry convention, you wouldn't know that they were furries.

....um. No. Unless you are positing that if it takes a hipster to know a hipster, therefore only like can recognize like applies universally to everything.

How are you at math? Not so good? 

Dok- Majoring in History at the moment, but Celtic studies are an option for later.

I'm just pointing out the flaw in reasoning that it takes a hipster to know a hipster.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

That may be so, however your logic dictates that only a hipster can recognize another hipster. By your logic, you would be unable to know that I have a beard.
Or that if you pass by a furry convention, you wouldn't know that they were furries.

....um. No. Unless you are positing that if it takes a hipster to know a hipster, therefore only like can recognize like applies universally to everything.

How are you at math? Not so good? 

Dok- Majoring in History at the moment, but Celtic studies are an option for later.

I'm just pointing out the flaw in reasoning that it takes a hipster to know a hipster.

There is no flaw. The flaw is in extrapolating that principle to everything else. 

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

That may be so, however your logic dictates that only a hipster can recognize another hipster. By your logic, you would be unable to know that I have a beard.
Or that if you pass by a furry convention, you wouldn't know that they were furries.

....um. No. Unless you are positing that if it takes a hipster to know a hipster, therefore only like can recognize like applies universally to everything.

How are you at math? Not so good? 

He's majoring in Celt.  So no.

Ohhh that makes sense. 

[Suu]

At least we can ALL agree at least he's not majoring in Welsh.

[Freeky]

That may be so, however your logic dictates that only a hipster can recognize another hipster. By your logic, you would be unable to know that I have a beard.
Or that if you pass by a furry convention, you wouldn't know that they were furries.

....um. No. Unless you are positing that if it takes a hipster to know a hipster, therefore only like can recognize like applies universally to everything.

How are you at math? Not so good? 

Dok- Majoring in History at the moment, but Celtic studies are an option for later.

I'm just pointing out the flaw in reasoning that it takes a hipster to know a hipster.

Nono, It takes a hipster who does not recognize himself/herself as one to know a hipster.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Also, please note that the statement "A + B = C" does not inherently define that ONLY A + B can = C. It is inclusive, not exclusive.

[Doktor Howl]

At least we can ALL agree at least he's not majoring in Welsh.

No accredited school would teach that.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

That may be so, however your logic dictates that only a hipster can recognize another hipster. By your logic, you would be unable to know that I have a beard.
Or that if you pass by a furry convention, you wouldn't know that they were furries.

....um. No. Unless you are positing that if it takes a hipster to know a hipster, therefore only like can recognize like applies universally to everything.

How are you at math? Not so good? 

Dok- Majoring in History at the moment, but Celtic studies are an option for later.

I'm just pointing out the flaw in reasoning that it takes a hipster to know a hipster.

Nono, It takes a hipster who does not recognize himself/herself as one to know a hipster.

This is... beautiful. I weep a tear of joy.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

At least we can ALL agree at least he's not majoring in Welsh.

[Nephew Twiddleton]

At least we can ALL agree at least he's not majoring in Welsh.

No accredited school would teach that.

Except Harvard.
If I get in Middle Welsh would be a required course.  

[Doktor Howl]

At least we can ALL agree at least he's not majoring in Welsh.

No accredited school would teach that.

Except Harvard.
If I get in Middle Welsh would be a required course.  

Oh, that's that liberal arts place upstream from MIT, right?

[Nephew Twiddleton]

That may be so, however your logic dictates that only a hipster can recognize another hipster. By your logic, you would be unable to know that I have a beard.
Or that if you pass by a furry convention, you wouldn't know that they were furries.

....um. No. Unless you are positing that if it takes a hipster to know a hipster, therefore only like can recognize like applies universally to everything.

How are you at math? Not so good? 

Dok- Majoring in History at the moment, but Celtic studies are an option for later.

I'm just pointing out the flaw in reasoning that it takes a hipster to know a hipster.

Nono, It takes a hipster who does not recognize himself/herself as one to know a hipster.

So, hipsters who are aware that they are hipsters are unable to spot a hipster?

[Nephew Twiddleton]

At least we can ALL agree at least he's not majoring in Welsh.

No accredited school would teach that.

Except Harvard.
If I get in Middle Welsh would be a required course.  

Oh, that's that liberal arts place upstream from MIT, right?

Yep.

[Doktor Howl]

That may be so, however your logic dictates that only a hipster can recognize another hipster. By your logic, you would be unable to know that I have a beard.
Or that if you pass by a furry convention, you wouldn't know that they were furries.

....um. No. Unless you are positing that if it takes a hipster to know a hipster, therefore only like can recognize like applies universally to everything.

How are you at math? Not so good? 

Dok- Majoring in History at the moment, but Celtic studies are an option for later.

I'm just pointing out the flaw in reasoning that it takes a hipster to know a hipster.

Nono, It takes a hipster who does not recognize himself/herself as one to know a hipster.

So, hipsters who are aware that they are hipsters are unable to spot a hipster?

This is correct, and we have actual proof:  Mr Language.