And Then, Suu, There's The Women

[East Coast Hustle]

Yeah, AKK's got it.

If a woman can't attract a man, it's her fault.  She just needs to suck some dick, be ready with his slippers and a cocktail when he gets home, and make sure those steaks are cooked a proper medium rare.

Simple.  Now get on it, subservient PD bitches!

WHY DOESN'T AKK HAVE A GIRLFRIEND?

This is the question of the century.  It's fucking bewildering.

Might wanna fact check that.  

Let me help:

We've been together a year and a half and are happy together and have plans to continue to share our lives together.  

I just really hope that you run "her" through a washing machine every once in a while.

[East Coast Hustle]

IS the rest of this thread worth reading now that AKK has fucked it up?

The rest of this BOARD is not worth reading, as AKK has fucked it up with his very presence.

I dunno.  This is just my observation, but I think everyone saw AKK arrive back on the scene and then wanted to be pissed off by him.  I mean, posters with zero experience and only the stuff they've heard from us old timers were starting at angry with him, before he hardly said much.  Now, yeah, he obviously was doing some trolling in this thread, but, if he has disrupted this board in any way, in my opinion, people wanted it to be disrupted.  I've been reading most of the threads he's posted in and I think he's been much more even keel than he was before. 

I mean, I really don't see how he's that much different than someone like Lies, some guy with an alpha-male personality that wants attention. 

But, just curious, what did he do to get banned? 

Actually he's a seemingly-sociopathic shitneck whose sole value to humanity lies in whatever preventive wisdom can be gleaned from a case study of the most consistently erroneous human being in history, whose streak of wrongness is matched only by the accompanying streak of self-aggrandizing dissertation on the merits of the aforementioned wrongness.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

IS the rest of this thread worth reading now that AKK has fucked it up?

The rest of this BOARD is not worth reading, as AKK has fucked it up with his very presence.

I dunno.  This is just my observation, but I think everyone saw AKK arrive back on the scene and then wanted to be pissed off by him.  I mean, posters with zero experience and only the stuff they've heard from us old timers were starting at angry with him, before he hardly said much.  Now, yeah, he obviously was doing some trolling in this thread, but, if he has disrupted this board in any way, in my opinion, people wanted it to be disrupted.  I've been reading most of the threads he's posted in and I think he's been much more even keel than he was before. 

I mean, I really don't see how he's that much different than someone like Lies, some guy with an alpha-male personality that wants attention. 

But, just curious, what did he do to get banned? 

Actually he's a seemingly-sociopathic shitneck whose sole value to humanity lies in whatever preventive wisdom can be gleaned from a case study of the most consistently erroneous human being in history, whose streak of wrongness is matched only by the accompanying streak of self-aggrandizing dissertation on the merits of the aforementioned wrongness.

This is good enough for me.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

The Friend Every guy has met one of these.  She hangs out, she talks to you (believe it or not, many of us value that), she listens.  What she won't do is date you, and acts surprised when you bring it up, despite the fact that you've walked around with your dick nailed to your forehead for the last 3 months.  Then women wonder why we go straight for the action.  It's usually the only working strategy.

One of the great rewards of Discordia is going back and finding old threads like these, in which I was TOTALLY FUCKING WRONG, and seeing how just how hilariously SMART I THOUGHT I WAS.

It's like this here belt I wear, from when I was FAT AS FUCK.  I keep the belt and punch holes in it to make it fit, so that I can see where I was BACK THEN and where I AM TODAY.

In short, I can measure my progress in terms of becoming a better human being.

[LMNO]

Wow. When it turns out AKK agrees with you, it's time to reevaluate your outlook on life.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Wow. When it turns out AKK agrees with you, it's time to reevaluate your outlook on life.

I didn't even need that.  I just needed to USE MY FUCKING BRAIN as something OTHER than a means to keep my ears apart.

Jesus, look how smug I am in the OP.

It would be cringe-worthy, if it weren't so funny.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

That one WAS a little...urgh. 

But most of the stuff was great. This got my attention:

4.  They actively attempt to sabotage the relationships or potential relationships of everyone around them, claiming that the SO or potential SO "doesn't measure up" for one reason or another.  Sometimes they're fucking sneaky arse biscuits about it, too.  One day, you're doing great with your new girl, the next she won't return your call.  Seems your "friend" made a call to your girl and "warned" her.  Girl talk, you know?  Just trying to "prevent disaster". This translates out to "that relationship isn't about me, so it has to go."

THIS.

THIS. THIS. THIS. THIS. THIS.

There's variations of it, some of them will wait a few months if they think the guy has money. During this time he's "THE ONE" (I hate that expression) according to them (not him) and they'll be on and on about it until you have to AVOID them to keep from getting the bullshit expectations ground into your head.

After a few months they'll hit you up for money. And when you say you don't have it, they'll be all "YOU'RE BROKE??!?? IF HE MAKES YOU FEEL LIKE YOU CAN'T ASK HIM FOR HELP YOU DON'T NEED HIM, IF HE WAS ANY GOOD HE WOULDN'T LET YOU STARVE TO DEATH, BLAH BLAH WOOF..."

This kind of shit is so prevalent that we learn at an early age to automatically tune out other women when it comes to guys. Which is a shame, because some women really do have valid points on the subject and aren't playing bullshit games.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

That one WAS a little...urgh. 

But most of the stuff was great. This got my attention:

4.  They actively attempt to sabotage the relationships or potential relationships of everyone around them, claiming that the SO or potential SO "doesn't measure up" for one reason or another.  Sometimes they're fucking sneaky arse biscuits about it, too.  One day, you're doing great with your new girl, the next she won't return your call.  Seems your "friend" made a call to your girl and "warned" her.  Girl talk, you know?  Just trying to "prevent disaster". This translates out to "that relationship isn't about me, so it has to go."

THIS.

THIS. THIS. THIS. THIS. THIS.

There's variations of it, some of them will wait a few months if they think the guy has money. During this time he's "THE ONE" (I hate that expression) according to them (not him) and they'll be on and on about it until you have to AVOID them to keep from getting the bullshit expectations ground into your head.

After a few months they'll hit you up for money. And when you say you don't have it, they'll be all "YOU'RE BROKE??!?? IF HE MAKES YOU FEEL LIKE YOU CAN'T ASK HIM FOR HELP YOU DON'T NEED HIM, IF HE WAS ANY GOOD HE WOULDN'T LET YOU STARVE TO DEATH, BLAH BLAH WOOF..."

This kind of shit is so prevalent that we learn at an early age to automatically tune out other women when it comes to guys. Which is a shame, because some women really do have valid points on the subject and aren't playing bullshit games.

Yeah, that one still applies.  So does the Princess one.

For now, anyway.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

But not for long.



Stella, both descriptions can AND DO also apply to guys.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

Now that you mention it...yeah. 

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Now that you mention it...yeah. 

Granted, this WAS originally written as a response to a thread from Suu in which she spells out all manner of awful stereotypes of guys...

HOWEVER

At what point did that excuse me from committing the same error?

  <--- Herpaderp.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

Sometimes we all have to spew. 

[Suu]

Now that you mention it...yeah. 

Granted, this WAS originally written as a response to a thread from Suu in which she spells out all manner of awful stereotypes of guys...

HOWEVER

At what point did that excuse me from committing the same error?

  <--- Herpaderp.

It is in this we learn from our mistakes. Heartbreak does nasty shit to people, and I did piss off some when I posted a thread that I thought was funny and cathartic from myself.

Does this help us grow as individuals, or cringe at our assholic past selves? 

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Does this help us grow as individuals, or cringe at our assholic past selves? 

Yes.   

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

The Friend Every guy has met one of these.  She hangs out, she talks to you (believe it or not, many of us value that), she listens.  What she won't do is date you, and acts surprised when you bring it up, despite the fact that you've walked around with your dick nailed to your forehead for the last 3 months.  Then women wonder why we go straight for the action.  It's usually the only working strategy.

One of the great rewards of Discordia is going back and finding old threads like these, in which I was TOTALLY FUCKING WRONG, and seeing how just how hilariously SMART I THOUGHT I WAS.

It's like this here belt I wear, from when I was FAT AS FUCK.  I keep the belt and punch holes in it to make it fit, so that I can see where I was BACK THEN and where I AM TODAY.

In short, I can measure my progress in terms of becoming a better human being.

I'm with you on that. I am eternally horrified at the idea of getting stuck, and not being a better person in five years than I am now. Looking at my past asinine posts is good reassurance that at least I'm making progress.