News:

if the thee off of you are revel in the fact you ds a discordant suck it's dick and praise it's agenda? guess what bit-chit's not. hat I in fact . do you really think it'd theshare about shit, hen you should indeed tare-take if the frontage that you're into. do you really think it's the hardcore shite of the left thy t? you're little f/cking girls parackind abbot in tituts. FUCK YOU. you're latecomers, and you 're folks who don't f/cking get it. plez challenge me.

Main Menu

NATO attacks Pakistan

Started by LMNO, November 26, 2011, 04:07:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

LMNO

November 26, 2011, 04:07:07 PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-15901363

How will this add to the current clusterfuck with US/Iran/Afghanistan/Syria?

Cain

#1
November 26, 2011, 05:11:40 PM
Not much, except remind people that NATO is pretty much involved in an arc of violence from the Hindu Kush all the way to the shores of Tripoli.

LMNO

#2
November 27, 2011, 04:14:09 AM
Oh. Ok. Thought there might be escalations.

Cain

#3
November 27, 2011, 09:08:42 AM
Escalations beyond Pakistan supporting the Taliban and Haqqani insurgents?

Jenne

#4
November 29, 2011, 04:53:22 PM
Aw, but the ISI are just a buncha goodfellas...

har har har har

Cain

#5
November 29, 2011, 07:46:53 PM
The best part is, there is no strategic rationale for a border attack at all.  Pakistan aren't going to seal their side, so why bother?  You might as well wait until they're 10 miles further into Afghan territory and drop a daisy-cutter on them. Same result, minus the dead Pakistani soldiers and complicated international incidents.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions