News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Hypothetical question.

Started by Nephew Twiddleton, February 01, 2012, 06:27:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

East Coast Hustle

Put it in realpolitik terms:

What do you have to gain by informing her?

Nothing, as near as I can tell.

What do you have to lose by informing her?

Just a friendship.
Rabid Colostomy Hole Jammer of the Coming Apocalypse™

The Devil is in the details; God is in the nuance.


Some yahoo yelled at me, saying 'GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH', and I thought, "I'm feeling generous today.  Why not BOTH?"

Jasper

I would want to be told, so I'm going with that. 

But then again, I'm too used to people who prefer honesty and disclosure no matter the cost.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:00:15 PM
I would want to be told, so I'm going with that. 

But then again, I'm too used to people who prefer honesty and disclosure no matter the cost.

"What an ugly baby."   :lulz:
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 06:57:11 PM
Put it in realpolitik terms:

What do you have to gain by informing her?

Nothing, as near as I can tell.

What do you have to lose by informing her?

Just a friendship.

Yep. Not that we're particularly close these days anyway, but I do like to talk to her here and there. She's living out of state and has a wife (and no, that wasn't the category- her video buddy was a dude) and seems to be settling into the being married thing.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Jasper

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:01:40 PM
Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:00:15 PM
I would want to be told, so I'm going with that. 

But then again, I'm too used to people who prefer honesty and disclosure no matter the cost.

"What an ugly baby."   :lulz:

No babies yet, but yeah.  They'd likely take that if it was patently true.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:02:32 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 06:57:11 PM
Put it in realpolitik terms:

What do you have to gain by informing her?

Nothing, as near as I can tell.

What do you have to lose by informing her?

Just a friendship.

Yep. Not that we're particularly close these days anyway, but I do like to talk to her here and there. She's living out of state and has a wife (and no, that wasn't the category- her video buddy was a dude) and seems to be settling into the being married thing.

Given that, DO NOT TELL HER.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:00:15 PM
I would want to be told, so I'm going with that. 

But then again, I'm too used to people who prefer honesty and disclosure no matter the cost.

Yeah, I would too.

But then again, I would also probably try to make the situation funny by asking, "so what did you think, eh?"
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Elder Iptuous

hmm, would it have been badwrong to wank to it? i mean, if it was known that it was available without her consent, then yeah.  but if it's not, then...  is it badwrong in the case of any video where it isn't explicitly clear that it is a production piece, and has their full consent?  could be, huh?

so, was it a surreptitious type video, or one that she obviously knew was being made?
also, there's sites that cater specifically to 'revenge vids' of ex-girlfriends.  which is pretty fucked up.

also, i have a feeling that one of the larger name pornstars is a girl that i had a crush on in 2nd grade.  (same name, and i could totally see an age progression of her 2nd grade pic looking like this woman)

Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:03:25 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:02:32 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 06:57:11 PM
Put it in realpolitik terms:

What do you have to gain by informing her?

Nothing, as near as I can tell.

What do you have to lose by informing her?

Just a friendship.

Yep. Not that we're particularly close these days anyway, but I do like to talk to her here and there. She's living out of state and has a wife (and no, that wasn't the category- her video buddy was a dude) and seems to be settling into the being married thing.

Given that, DO NOT TELL HER.

Yeah- good point. Her missus might end up seeing the email and the link by accident, among other things like putting the whole thing behind her at this point.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Jasper

Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:04:32 PM
hmm, would it have been badwrong to wank to it? i mean, if it was known that it was available without her consent, then yeah.  but if it's not, then...  is it badwrong in the case of any video where it isn't explicitly clear that it is a production piece, and has their full consent?  could be, huh?

so, was it a surreptitious type video, or one that she obviously knew was being made?
also, there's sites that cater specifically to 'revenge vids' of ex-girlfriends.  which is pretty fucked up.

The rule of consent that I follow is that if consent cannot be determined, then the default is no.

Jasper

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on February 01, 2012, 07:03:25 PM
Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:02:32 PM
Quote from: Fuck You One-Eye on February 01, 2012, 06:57:11 PM
Put it in realpolitik terms:

What do you have to gain by informing her?

Nothing, as near as I can tell.

What do you have to lose by informing her?

Just a friendship.

Yep. Not that we're particularly close these days anyway, but I do like to talk to her here and there. She's living out of state and has a wife (and no, that wasn't the category- her video buddy was a dude) and seems to be settling into the being married thing.

Given that, DO NOT TELL HER.

Didn't know it could wreck a marriage.  Don't tell.  2nded.

Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:04:32 PM
hmm, would it have been badwrong to wank to it? i mean, if it was known that it was available without her consent, then yeah.  but if it's not, then...  is it badwrong in the case of any video where it isn't explicitly clear that it is a production piece, and has their full consent?  could be, huh?

so, was it a surreptitious type video, or one that she obviously knew was being made?
also, there's sites that cater specifically to 'revenge vids' of ex-girlfriends.  which is pretty fucked up.

also, i have a feeling that one of the larger name pornstars is a girl that i had a crush on in 2nd grade.  (same name, and i could totally see an age progression of her 2nd grade pic looking like this woman)

She knew she was being filmed. It was shot POV style.

It would have been bad to wank because I wanted her and was rejected. It was something I was never meant to see but merely imagine. It would feel like peeping on her. I know what the real thing looks like now.

I think it would be like masturapetion in this specific circumstance.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Billy the Twid on February 01, 2012, 07:12:58 PM
It would have been bad to wank because I wanted her and was rejected. It was something I was never meant to see but merely imagine. It would feel like peeping on her. I know what the real thing looks like now.

Yep.  That's one reason lesbian porn has no appeal for me.  They wouldn't want me under any circumstances, so there's no suspension of disbelief.

Which is what really, really puzzles me about the apparent appeal of "barely legal" pron in the 35-65 demographic.  It's fucking disturbing.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Elder Iptuous

Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:10:02 PM
Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:04:32 PM
hmm, would it have been badwrong to wank to it? i mean, if it was known that it was available without her consent, then yeah.  but if it's not, then...  is it badwrong in the case of any video where it isn't explicitly clear that it is a production piece, and has their full consent?  could be, huh?

so, was it a surreptitious type video, or one that she obviously knew was being made?
also, there's sites that cater specifically to 'revenge vids' of ex-girlfriends.  which is pretty fucked up.

The rule of consent that I follow is that if consent cannot be determined, then the default is no.

so the girls in the amateur or 'pro amateur' type stuff (who are generally more attractive, no?) are out, as there would always be question there...
gotta be some big label with the obviously pornstar ladies...

hm... what if twid remembers the video while wanking in the future?  :lol:  not diligently pushing it out of his mind, or letting it linger a bit too long would be badwrong....

(i'm just spouting here, not trying to be offensive at all.  tell me to stfu, if i am.)

Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:17:56 PM
Quote from: Jasper on February 01, 2012, 07:10:02 PM
Quote from: Iptuous on February 01, 2012, 07:04:32 PM
hmm, would it have been badwrong to wank to it? i mean, if it was known that it was available without her consent, then yeah.  but if it's not, then...  is it badwrong in the case of any video where it isn't explicitly clear that it is a production piece, and has their full consent?  could be, huh?

so, was it a surreptitious type video, or one that she obviously knew was being made?
also, there's sites that cater specifically to 'revenge vids' of ex-girlfriends.  which is pretty fucked up.

The rule of consent that I follow is that if consent cannot be determined, then the default is no.

so the girls in the amateur or 'pro amateur' type stuff (who are generally more attractive, no?) are out, as there would always be question there...
gotta be some big label with the obviously pornstar ladies...

hm... what if twid remembers the video while wanking in the future?  :lol:  not diligently pushing it out of his mind, or letting it linger a bit too long would be badwrong....

(i'm just spouting here, not trying to be offensive at all.  tell me to stfu, if i am.)

I dunno man, I don't think that I'll be able to fantasize about her at all anymore. It would be weird.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS