News:

MysticWicks endorsement: "Spoiled brats of the pagan world, I thought. I really don't have a lot of respect for Discordians. They just strike me as spiritually lazy."

Main Menu

Family of Florida boy killed by Neighborhood Watch seeks arrest

Started by Freeky, March 11, 2012, 04:52:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Emo Howard on April 22, 2012, 08:54:35 PM
I'm not convinced he was obligated to follow the dispatcher's instructions. Even if he were, "We don't need you to do that." is not the same as "Do not do that."

Doesn't matter.  He, knowing the cops were on the way, escalated the conflict.
Molon Lube

Placid Dingo

Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 23, 2012, 02:13:28 PM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 22, 2012, 08:54:35 PM
I'm not convinced he was obligated to follow the dispatcher's instructions. Even if he were, "We don't need you to do that." is not the same as "Do not do that."

Doesn't matter.  He, knowing the cops were on the way, escalated the conflict.

But I would wonder if (i don't know how US law differs from Aus) if the charge could conceivably be dropped to manslaughter.
Haven't paid rent since 2014 with ONE WEIRD TRICK.

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Placid Dingo on April 23, 2012, 02:34:14 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 23, 2012, 02:13:28 PM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 22, 2012, 08:54:35 PM
I'm not convinced he was obligated to follow the dispatcher's instructions. Even if he were, "We don't need you to do that." is not the same as "Do not do that."

Doesn't matter.  He, knowing the cops were on the way, escalated the conflict.

But I would wonder if (i don't know how US law differs from Aus) if the charge could conceivably be dropped to manslaughter.

That part depends, largely, on intent. 

My bet is, the jury drops murder 2 and convicts on manslaughter 1.

Personally, I don't think - for several reasons - that race was (overtly) involved.  I think he was a dumbass who had been a hero once already for catching a burglar at gun point, and wanted to do it again, so he waded in with disregard for the potential consequences for the victim.

And that's murder 2.  But it's Florida, so it's gonna come back manslaughter 1 at most.
Molon Lube

navkat

Quote from: Emo Howard on April 22, 2012, 04:56:02 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 22, 2012, 04:06:43 AM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 21, 2012, 10:42:31 PM
If Zimmerman's story is true, I don't think he deserves any jail time.

I am, however, uncomfortable with the lack of witnesses.

If monkeys ride out of my asshole on unicycles, I may have to rethink my religious views.

I am, however, uncomfortable with the idea of repeatability.

Waterboard Zimmerman 2012!

:horrormirth:

Doktor Howl

Quote from: navkat on April 23, 2012, 04:12:38 PM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 22, 2012, 04:56:02 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 22, 2012, 04:06:43 AM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 21, 2012, 10:42:31 PM
If Zimmerman's story is true, I don't think he deserves any jail time.

I am, however, uncomfortable with the lack of witnesses.

If monkeys ride out of my asshole on unicycles, I may have to rethink my religious views.

I am, however, uncomfortable with the idea of repeatability.

Waterboard Zimmerman 2012!

:horrormirth:

BECAUSE ASKING FOR DUE PROCESS IS JUST LIKE TORTURE!

UNNNNNNNNNNNNG!
Molon Lube

Bruno

Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 23, 2012, 02:11:05 PM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 22, 2012, 04:56:02 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 22, 2012, 04:06:43 AM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 21, 2012, 10:42:31 PM
If Zimmerman's story is true, I don't think he deserves any jail time.

I am, however, uncomfortable with the lack of witnesses.

If monkeys ride out of my asshole on unicycles, I may have to rethink my religious views.

I am, however, uncomfortable with the idea of repeatability.

Waterboard Zimmerman 2012!

How about a jury trial?

Is that too much to ask?

Or should we just let him go?


That would be fine.
Formerly something else...

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Emo Howard on April 23, 2012, 08:08:03 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 23, 2012, 02:11:05 PM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 22, 2012, 04:56:02 AM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 22, 2012, 04:06:43 AM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 21, 2012, 10:42:31 PM
If Zimmerman's story is true, I don't think he deserves any jail time.

I am, however, uncomfortable with the lack of witnesses.

If monkeys ride out of my asshole on unicycles, I may have to rethink my religious views.

I am, however, uncomfortable with the idea of repeatability.

Waterboard Zimmerman 2012!

How about a jury trial?

Is that too much to ask?

Or should we just let him go?


That would be fine.

Are you sure?  We don't want to violate anyone's civil rights, now.
Molon Lube

Bruno

As long as the jury is impartial. From what I've seen so far, that's not going to be easy.
Formerly something else...

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Emo Howard on April 23, 2012, 08:20:07 PM
As long as the jury is impartial. From what I've seen so far, that's not going to be easy.

So if a case becomes famous, we should just drop it?

Note to self:  When I finally go berserk, make sure there are reporters around.

Note to self:  Do not kill reporters until they file their story.
Molon Lube

Bruno

I never said I was against a jury trial.

We could waterboard him at the trial!

Formerly something else...

Nephew Twiddleton

From what i understand even if this case didnt become famous it would be an unfair trial on the grounds of it being florida. Trial by jurys the best thing we can implement here though so...

Remember- sometimes unfair works in the defendants interest.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 23, 2012, 02:13:28 PM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 22, 2012, 08:54:35 PM
I'm not convinced he was obligated to follow the dispatcher's instructions. Even if he were, "We don't need you to do that." is not the same as "Do not do that."

Doesn't matter.  He, knowing the cops were on the way, escalated created the conflict.

Fixed.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Doktor Howl

Quote from: Nigel on April 24, 2012, 04:20:15 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 23, 2012, 02:13:28 PM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 22, 2012, 08:54:35 PM
I'm not convinced he was obligated to follow the dispatcher's instructions. Even if he were, "We don't need you to do that." is not the same as "Do not do that."

Doesn't matter.  He, knowing the cops were on the way, escalated created the conflict.

Fixed.

I say "escalated", because the conflict was already taking place (and yes, Zimmerman started it) but did not have the potential for anyone getting killed until he escalated it by stalking Martin.
Molon Lube

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Emo Howard on April 23, 2012, 08:26:09 PM
I never said I was against a jury trial.

We could waterboard him at the trial!

I think it's really interesting that you seem to be under the impression that this man is being unfairly accused of pursuing, assaulting, and killing a person who was walking through his own neighborhood, talking to his girlfriend on a cell phone and minding his own business.

We know that he pursued him.

We know that there was a scuffle.

We know that he shot and killed him.

What planet are you on where in some way the fact that the evidence leans badly against Zimmerman presents some kind of inequity of fairness?

The only thing in question is the degree of the crime, not whether one was committed. Even in Florida, it's illegal to initiate a conflict and shoot someone because you think they look suspicious on a public street.

As far as the racism element, I have no idea whether Zimmerman perceived Martin as being more suspicious because he was black, but that's really a moot point. The fact that the local cops didn't take him in, tried to protect him, and have a lengthy history of racism is pretty damning of the police department there, and people are not erroneously outraged about the racism of that situation. People need to stop conflating the outrage about the police department's blatant racism with the motivations of Zimmerman in going after Martin.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 24, 2012, 04:25:45 PM
Quote from: Nigel on April 24, 2012, 04:20:15 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on April 23, 2012, 02:13:28 PM
Quote from: Emo Howard on April 22, 2012, 08:54:35 PM
I'm not convinced he was obligated to follow the dispatcher's instructions. Even if he were, "We don't need you to do that." is not the same as "Do not do that."

Doesn't matter.  He, knowing the cops were on the way, escalated created the conflict.

Fixed.

I say "escalated", because the conflict was already taking place (and yes, Zimmerman started it) but did not have the potential for anyone getting killed until he escalated it by stalking Martin.

Oh, I gotcha. He called the cops after he started chasing Martin.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."