Egalitarianism

[Faust]

No, you never made it explicit, and if you are just going to be hostile when asked a question I don't see any further value in engaging in any of this.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

No, you never made it explicit, and if you are just going to be hostile when asked a question I don't see any further value in engaging in any of this.

BULL FUCKING SHIT.

Yeah, I'm hostile, but I not only QUOTED THE TWO PEOPLE I AM TALKING ABOUT, which is v3x and P3nt (I'm starting to think that the letter 3 as a substitute for e is on par with having "wolf" in your name), and explicitly called them out, but I also explicitly said that if you aren't CERTAIN it's you, it's not.

Jesus fucking christ. 

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

"Implied", my fucking ass. I might have also "implied" that I have a problem with the social status quo, the corporate economy, and prisons for profit, elsewhere on the board. I'm fucking SUBTLE that way.

[Faust]

No, you never made it explicit, and if you are just going to be hostile when asked a question I don't see any further value in engaging in any of this.

BULL FUCKING SHIT.

Yeah, I'm hostile, but I not only QUOTED THE TWO PEOPLE I AM TALKING ABOUT, which is v3x and P3nt (I'm starting to think that the letter 3 as a substitute for e is on par with having "wolf" in your name), and explicitly called them out, but I also explicitly said that if you aren't CERTAIN it's you, it's not.

Jesus fucking christ. 

I'm looking for something explicit in this

"One of the delightful messages that I'm getting from these threads is there is a certain contingent here who really want women to be the equivalent of boot-licking niggers who don't talk about what they want, and are willing to get quite vocal and abusive to try to make that happen.

I have two messages for those people:

1. Ain't gonna happen bro, and the world is a scary place weak, pathetic, insecure little gits like you,

2. Thanks for revealing yourselves."

I don't see it. You certainly did quote them after that, we can't read your mind or that "a certain contingent" meant those two people. In fact as these threads are all basically the same topic if I was to go off of the quote logic Cain would fall into that too from the time it was posted.
I don't think comments like that are helping, especially the way these discussion are going.

[Faust]

"Implied", my fucking ass. I might have also "implied" that I have a problem with the social status quo, the corporate economy, and prisons for profit, elsewhere on the board. I'm fucking SUBTLE that way.

No you explicitly stated them. You didn't for this.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

No, you never made it explicit, and if you are just going to be hostile when asked a question I don't see any further value in engaging in any of this.

BULL FUCKING SHIT.

Yeah, I'm hostile, but I not only QUOTED THE TWO PEOPLE I AM TALKING ABOUT, which is v3x and P3nt (I'm starting to think that the letter 3 as a substitute for e is on par with having "wolf" in your name), and explicitly called them out, but I also explicitly said that if you aren't CERTAIN it's you, it's not.

Jesus fucking christ. 

I'm looking for something explicit in this

"One of the delightful messages that I'm getting from these threads is there is a certain contingent here who really want women to be the equivalent of boot-licking niggers who don't talk about what they want, and are willing to get quite vocal and abusive to try to make that happen.

I have two messages for those people:

1. Ain't gonna happen bro, and the world is a scary place weak, pathetic, insecure little gits like you,

2. Thanks for revealing yourselves."

I don't see it. You certainly did quote them after that, we can't read your mind or that "a certain contingent" meant those two people. In fact as these threads are all basically the same topic if I was to go off of the quote logic Cain would fall into that too from the time it was posted.
I don't think comments like that are helping, especially the way these discussion are going.

It's in a different thread, which I also said. Explicitly. Your lack of reading is not my fault.

Is there something not explicit enough about me naming the two people I'm talking about? Or do you just want to keep quoting that one post and claiming I'm unclear because I didn't re-assert who they are in that one single post?

Or maybe in your heart of hearts you DO think what I said applies to you, and that's why you're being defensive? 

Go on, claim that I'm accusing you by joking about it, won't you?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

"Implied", my fucking ass. I might have also "implied" that I have a problem with the social status quo, the corporate economy, and prisons for profit, elsewhere on the board. I'm fucking SUBTLE that way.

No you explicitly stated them. You didn't for this.

If there's no way in hell I can possibly understand your thing then why in fuck have you dedicated your existence to trying to explain it to me?

Oh wait, that's right you're not trying to explain, you're just impotently bitching and whining? fine. Carry on.

(White) men cannot understand, but our help is needed. We have an obligation to help, partly because we recognize there is a problem and partly because we are the ones "in charge," so we are the only ones who can change things. At least, without a revolution. But we cannot be in charge of what needs to be done, and since we do not understand what it is like to be oppressed we cannot offer advice on what might mitigate that oppression if our advice has anything to do with changing the opinions or behaviors of the oppressed. We can only be of assistance in doing it. We are like lions, if a lion could be hired to guide a safari through lion territory.

OK, good, the two of you have succeeded in convincing me that you're both complete fucking idiots with no interest in social change or understanding.


In closing, go fuck yourselves to death with sharp sticks. Congratulations on being part of the problem, DIAF. That is all.

Oh look. No, I guess I wasn't very explicit, there.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

This is kind of like that time when some people threw a hissy fit because they didn't remember the discussion about the Discordian devival webpage.

I DIDN'T READ THAT THREAD, SO IT NEVER HAPPENED AND YOU'RE EXCLUDING ME ON PURPOSE.

Jesus fuck. 

[Faust]

No, you never made it explicit, and if you are just going to be hostile when asked a question I don't see any further value in engaging in any of this.

BULL FUCKING SHIT.

Yeah, I'm hostile, but I not only QUOTED THE TWO PEOPLE I AM TALKING ABOUT, which is v3x and P3nt (I'm starting to think that the letter 3 as a substitute for e is on par with having "wolf" in your name), and explicitly called them out, but I also explicitly said that if you aren't CERTAIN it's you, it's not.

Jesus fucking christ. 

I'm looking for something explicit in this

"One of the delightful messages that I'm getting from these threads is there is a certain contingent here who really want women to be the equivalent of boot-licking niggers who don't talk about what they want, and are willing to get quite vocal and abusive to try to make that happen.

I have two messages for those people:

1. Ain't gonna happen bro, and the world is a scary place weak, pathetic, insecure little gits like you,

2. Thanks for revealing yourselves."

I don't see it. You certainly did quote them after that, we can't read your mind or that "a certain contingent" meant those two people. In fact as these threads are all basically the same topic if I was to go off of the quote logic Cain would fall into that too from the time it was posted.
I don't think comments like that are helping, especially the way these discussion are going.

It's in a different thread, which I also said. Explicitly. Your lack of reading is not my fault.

Is there something not explicit enough about me naming the two people I'm talking about? Or do you just want to keep quoting that one post and claiming I'm unclear because I didn't re-assert who they are in that one single post?

Or maybe in your heart of hearts you DO think what I said applies to you, and that's why you're being defensive? 

Go on, claim that I'm accusing you by joking about it, won't you?

I don't think you are accusing me, are you? It is that post I take issue with. I think if you are going to make ugly crude accusations that will end any further discussions in these threads you should explicitly name the people you take issue with. It wasn't explicit nor did you say anything to limit the range beyond "One of the delightful messages that I'm getting from these threads"
A couple of days ago in these threads you quoted roger in a similar fashion, perhaps he was included?
Who else here do you think makes up this certain contingent here who really want women to be the equivalent of boot-licking niggers who don't talk about what they want, and are willing to get quite vocal and abusive to try to make that happen?
Is it just two people?

[Faust]

This is kind of like that time when some people threw a hissy fit because they didn't remember the discussion about the Discordian devival webpage.

I DIDN'T READ THAT THREAD, SO IT NEVER HAPPENED AND YOU'RE EXCLUDING ME ON PURPOSE.

Jesus fuck. 

I don't think I am having a hissy fit? Do you think I am? Perhaps you perceive some problem in questioning you on what you posted? Why are you being defensive about a question asking for clarity?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

No, you never made it explicit, and if you are just going to be hostile when asked a question I don't see any further value in engaging in any of this.

BULL FUCKING SHIT.

Yeah, I'm hostile, but I not only QUOTED THE TWO PEOPLE I AM TALKING ABOUT, which is v3x and P3nt (I'm starting to think that the letter 3 as a substitute for e is on par with having "wolf" in your name), and explicitly called them out, but I also explicitly said that if you aren't CERTAIN it's you, it's not.

Jesus fucking christ. 

I'm looking for something explicit in this

"One of the delightful messages that I'm getting from these threads is there is a certain contingent here who really want women to be the equivalent of boot-licking niggers who don't talk about what they want, and are willing to get quite vocal and abusive to try to make that happen.

I have two messages for those people:

1. Ain't gonna happen bro, and the world is a scary place weak, pathetic, insecure little gits like you,

2. Thanks for revealing yourselves."

I don't see it. You certainly did quote them after that, we can't read your mind or that "a certain contingent" meant those two people. In fact as these threads are all basically the same topic if I was to go off of the quote logic Cain would fall into that too from the time it was posted.
I don't think comments like that are helping, especially the way these discussion are going.

It's in a different thread, which I also said. Explicitly. Your lack of reading is not my fault.

Is there something not explicit enough about me naming the two people I'm talking about? Or do you just want to keep quoting that one post and claiming I'm unclear because I didn't re-assert who they are in that one single post?

Or maybe in your heart of hearts you DO think what I said applies to you, and that's why you're being defensive? 

Go on, claim that I'm accusing you by joking about it, won't you?

I don't think you are accusing me, are you? It is that post I take issue with. I think if you are going to make ugly crude accusations that will end any further discussions in these threads you should explicitly name the people you take issue with. It wasn't explicit nor did you say anything to limit the range beyond "One of the delightful messages that I'm getting from these threads"
A couple of days ago in these threads you quoted roger in a similar fashion, perhaps he was included?
Who else here do you think makes up this certain contingent here who really want women to be the equivalent of boot-licking niggers who don't talk about what they want, and are willing to get quite vocal and abusive to try to make that happen?
Is it just two people?

REALLY? I quoted ROGER and said something similar to what I said there? I called him an idiot and part of the problem, and told him to fuck himself to death on a pointy stick?

???

Somehow, I think you MAY be mistaken. 

I think that the two people I EXPLICITLY NAMED want women to be the equivalent of boot-licking niggers who don't talk about what they want, and are willing to get quite vocal and abusive to try to make that happen, and I will also include anyone who agrees with them in that assessment, whether they are active posters or not. Clearly, I have no way of knowing who those hypothetical other people are or whether they even exist, but I'll just throw them in there for good measure.

DO YOU NEED ME TO BE MORE EXPLICIT, FAUST? AM I BEING TOO SUBTLE? HINTING AROUND A LITTLE TOO MUCH MAYBE?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

This is kind of like that time when some people threw a hissy fit because they didn't remember the discussion about the Discordian devival webpage.

I DIDN'T READ THAT THREAD, SO IT NEVER HAPPENED AND YOU'RE EXCLUDING ME ON PURPOSE.

Jesus fuck. 

I don't think I am having a hissy fit? Do you think I am? Perhaps you perceive some problem in questioning you on what you posted? Why are you being defensive about a question asking for clarity?

Because I am angry, and you are behaving like an idiot.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

"Implied", my fucking ass. I might have also "implied" that I have a problem with the social status quo, the corporate economy, and prisons for profit, elsewhere on the board. I'm fucking SUBTLE that way.

No you explicitly stated them. You didn't for this.

If there's no way in hell I can possibly understand your thing then why in fuck have you dedicated your existence to trying to explain it to me?

Oh wait, that's right you're not trying to explain, you're just impotently bitching and whining? fine. Carry on.

(White) men cannot understand, but our help is needed. We have an obligation to help, partly because we recognize there is a problem and partly because we are the ones "in charge," so we are the only ones who can change things. At least, without a revolution. But we cannot be in charge of what needs to be done, and since we do not understand what it is like to be oppressed we cannot offer advice on what might mitigate that oppression if our advice has anything to do with changing the opinions or behaviors of the oppressed. We can only be of assistance in doing it. We are like lions, if a lion could be hired to guide a safari through lion territory.

OK, good, the two of you have succeeded in convincing me that you're both complete fucking idiots with no interest in social change or understanding.


In closing, go fuck yourselves to death with sharp sticks. Congratulations on being part of the problem, DIAF. That is all.

Oh look. No, I guess I wasn't very explicit, there.

Not gonna acknowledge this?

Figures.     

[Faust]

"Implied", my fucking ass. I might have also "implied" that I have a problem with the social status quo, the corporate economy, and prisons for profit, elsewhere on the board. I'm fucking SUBTLE that way.

No you explicitly stated them. You didn't for this.

If there's no way in hell I can possibly understand your thing then why in fuck have you dedicated your existence to trying to explain it to me?

Oh wait, that's right you're not trying to explain, you're just impotently bitching and whining? fine. Carry on.

(White) men cannot understand, but our help is needed. We have an obligation to help, partly because we recognize there is a problem and partly because we are the ones "in charge," so we are the only ones who can change things. At least, without a revolution. But we cannot be in charge of what needs to be done, and since we do not understand what it is like to be oppressed we cannot offer advice on what might mitigate that oppression if our advice has anything to do with changing the opinions or behaviors of the oppressed. We can only be of assistance in doing it. We are like lions, if a lion could be hired to guide a safari through lion territory.

OK, good, the two of you have succeeded in convincing me that you're both complete fucking idiots with no interest in social change or understanding.


In closing, go fuck yourselves to death with sharp sticks. Congratulations on being part of the problem, DIAF. That is all.

Oh look. No, I guess I wasn't very explicit, there.

Not gonna acknowledge this?

Figures.     

You weren't explicit with those. Perhaps it was implied by my two disconnected posts?

[Faust]

This is kind of like that time when some people threw a hissy fit because they didn't remember the discussion about the Discordian devival webpage.

I DIDN'T READ THAT THREAD, SO IT NEVER HAPPENED AND YOU'RE EXCLUDING ME ON PURPOSE.

Jesus fuck. 

I don't think I am having a hissy fit? Do you think I am? Perhaps you perceive some problem in questioning you on what you posted? Why are you being defensive about a question asking for clarity?

Because I am angry, and you are behaving like an idiot.

I don't think I am, does asking questions make someone an idiot? I'm not angry, I feel sorry for you that you are.