Unlimited "Guns, Fuck Yeah!" Thread

[Elder Iptuous]

neither did he, but that didn't stop him!

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

neither did he, but that didn't stop him!

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

  :

[AFK]

I think there are some good points in this piece, which was written by a Texan gun-owner.  And I agree with him. If we can give first responders those extra couple of seconds where they can take out a gunman and lower the bodycount then we should pursue that course of action.


http://blurt-online.com/features/view/1309/
[/size]

[East Coast Hustle]

Alot of what he says makes sense and the last paragraph is spot-on. Still not a good argument for fucking with the Bill of Rights.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495#50208495

"IT WAS AN ASSAULT RIFLE, WE FOUND SHELL CASINGS...NO, IT WAS FOUR HANDGUNS..."

[AFK]

Alot of what he says makes sense and the last paragraph is spot-on. Still not a good argument for fucking with the Bill of Rights.

I can't think of a better reason, saving lives.  Rights and freedoms mean nothing to someone who is dead.


And besides, the kind of things he proposes in terms of gun regulations, I believe, doesn't "fuck with" the bill of rights.

[Cain]

Rights and freedoms mean nothing to someone who is dead..

Marc Thiessen says the exact same thing, when it comes to why we need to strap down random Arabs and torture them.

[Cain]

You know what else would keep people safe?  Employing half the country to keep the other half under permament house arrest.

Anyone who suggests any less isn't serious about saving lives.

[Juana]

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I can't think of a better reason, saving lives.  Rights and freedoms mean nothing to someone who is dead.

And a life without rights and freedoms is cheap.  Starvation cheap.

[Salty]

Give Me What You Think Is As Much Freedom As Will Assure My Safety And/Or Kill Me,  Or Whatever!

[AFK]

Rights and freedoms mean nothing to someone who is dead..

Marc Thiessen says the exact same thing, when it comes to why we need to strap down random Arabs and torture them.

Which is in a completely different context and scenario and has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand.

[AFK]

I can't think of a better reason, saving lives.  Rights and freedoms mean nothing to someone who is dead.

And a life without rights and freedoms is cheap.  Starvation cheap.

Really?  Really?  You are going to equate having a few less firearms that someone (with the considerable disposable income necessary to purchase said firearms) can purchase with starvation?  C'mon, this is First World Problem territory here. 

[East Coast Hustle]

Messing with the Bill of Rights is most certainly a first-world problem. I for one would prefer it stay that way.