News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Unlimited "Guns, Fuck Yeah!" Thread

Started by AFK, January 20, 2013, 12:56:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:48:22 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:47:03 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:42:52 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:37:58 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:33:58 PM
Well, those are great long-term goals.  But what are you going to do about the problem RIGHT NOW?

Wait... are you under the impression that passing more gun control laws is a short-term solution?

:lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz:

What on EARTH gives you that idea?


Don't answer the question with a question.  The goals you listed are good, but long term and nothing you would be able to pass or enact in the short term.  So I'll ask again.  What would you do RIGHT NOW to start impacting the issue of gun violence?

You answer questions with questions all the time, hypocrite.  :lol:

Let's take just one of my suggestions: Impose a maximum wage.

How is that not "right now"? How is passing more gun control laws somehow more immediate? It certainly hasn't shown to be effective in reducing gun violence so far, so why do you think it will start being effective now?


Okay, my first question would be what specifically is it about the maximum wage that would reduce gun violence? Walk me through it.

Don't answer a question with a question.

If you want to know, read the research. Your laziness is not my responsibility.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


AFK

Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:49:03 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:46:54 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:43:58 PM
Oh oh oh

I left out "without reviewing the existing literature on the subject".

He's like our very own Glenn Beck!


Well, since you obviously have, here is your chance to educate me.  I'm all ears.

I already posted a link to a research article about income disparity and gun violence back on page one. Read it.


I'd rather have a local expert summarize it for me.  Go ahead.
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:51:00 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:49:03 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:46:54 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:43:58 PM
Oh oh oh

I left out "without reviewing the existing literature on the subject".

He's like our very own Glenn Beck!


Well, since you obviously have, here is your chance to educate me.  I'm all ears.

I already posted a link to a research article about income disparity and gun violence back on page one. Read it.


I'd rather have a local expert summarize it for me.  Go ahead.

TRANSLATION:  RWHN WILL NEVER, EVER READ A SOURCE THAT DISAGREES WITH HIS OPINION.

Doktor's question:  Why is anyone giving this bitter fucking asshole what he wants?
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Salty

Man, I don't know why I though this thread was about guns. I feel like an asshole now.

ANYhoo, yeah.
The world is a car and you're the crash test dummy.

Cain

Quote from: Alty on January 21, 2013, 06:52:19 PM
Man, I don't know why I though this thread was about guns. I feel like an asshole now.

ANYhoo, yeah.

It is now about a picture of you eating your pants.

Come on Alty, the American People demand pics.

AFK

Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:49:54 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:48:22 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:47:03 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:42:52 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:37:58 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:33:58 PM
Well, those are great long-term goals.  But what are you going to do about the problem RIGHT NOW?

Wait... are you under the impression that passing more gun control laws is a short-term solution?

:lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz:

What on EARTH gives you that idea?


Don't answer the question with a question.  The goals you listed are good, but long term and nothing you would be able to pass or enact in the short term.  So I'll ask again.  What would you do RIGHT NOW to start impacting the issue of gun violence?

You answer questions with questions all the time, hypocrite.  :lol:

Let's take just one of my suggestions: Impose a maximum wage.

How is that not "right now"? How is passing more gun control laws somehow more immediate? It certainly hasn't shown to be effective in reducing gun violence so far, so why do you think it will start being effective now?


Okay, my first question would be what specifically is it about the maximum wage that would reduce gun violence? Walk me through it.

Don't answer a question with a question.

If you want to know, read the research. Your laziness is not my responsibility.


It's your idea I would expect you to be able to support it and explain to me how it would work.
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Alty on January 21, 2013, 06:52:19 PM
Man, I don't know why I though this thread was about guns. I feel like an asshole now.

ANYhoo, yeah.

RWHN started the thread.  Ergo it is about sharing his butthurt with everyone else.  Spreading the wealth a little, you see.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:53:35 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:49:54 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:48:22 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:47:03 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:42:52 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:37:58 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:33:58 PM
Well, those are great long-term goals.  But what are you going to do about the problem RIGHT NOW?

Wait... are you under the impression that passing more gun control laws is a short-term solution?

:lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz:

What on EARTH gives you that idea?


Don't answer the question with a question.  The goals you listed are good, but long term and nothing you would be able to pass or enact in the short term.  So I'll ask again.  What would you do RIGHT NOW to start impacting the issue of gun violence?

You answer questions with questions all the time, hypocrite.  :lol:

Let's take just one of my suggestions: Impose a maximum wage.

How is that not "right now"? How is passing more gun control laws somehow more immediate? It certainly hasn't shown to be effective in reducing gun violence so far, so why do you think it will start being effective now?


Okay, my first question would be what specifically is it about the maximum wage that would reduce gun violence? Walk me through it.

Don't answer a question with a question.

If you want to know, read the research. Your laziness is not my responsibility.


It's your idea I would expect you to be able to support it and explain to me how it would work.

And you support an idea by... dun Dun DUN...PROVIDING CITATIONS.

Which RWHN will never read, because this thread isn't about Sandy Hook or gun control or anything like that.  This thread is about RWHN standing in the wreckage of his life and throwing poop at anyone who comes near.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

AFK

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on January 21, 2013, 06:52:04 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:51:00 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:49:03 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:46:54 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:43:58 PM
Oh oh oh

I left out "without reviewing the existing literature on the subject".

He's like our very own Glenn Beck!


Well, since you obviously have, here is your chance to educate me.  I'm all ears.

I already posted a link to a research article about income disparity and gun violence back on page one. Read it.


I'd rather have a local expert summarize it for me.  Go ahead.

TRANSLATION:  RWHN WILL NEVER, EVER READ A SOURCE THAT DISAGREES WITH HIS OPINION.

Doktor's question:  Why is anyone giving this bitter fucking asshole what he wants?


No, what I'm trying to do is to get people to demonstrate they actually understand and can support what they are proposing and how it specifically would impact gun violence.  "LOL read the research" wouldn't cut it in the real world.  If you are throwing up a proposal, you have to be able to defend it.
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:55:52 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on January 21, 2013, 06:52:04 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:51:00 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:49:03 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:46:54 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:43:58 PM
Oh oh oh

I left out "without reviewing the existing literature on the subject".

He's like our very own Glenn Beck!


Well, since you obviously have, here is your chance to educate me.  I'm all ears.

I already posted a link to a research article about income disparity and gun violence back on page one. Read it.


I'd rather have a local expert summarize it for me.  Go ahead.

TRANSLATION:  RWHN WILL NEVER, EVER READ A SOURCE THAT DISAGREES WITH HIS OPINION.

Doktor's question:  Why is anyone giving this bitter fucking asshole what he wants?


No, what I'm trying to do is to get people to demonstrate they actually understand and can support what they are proposing and how it specifically would impact gun violence.  "LOL read the research" wouldn't cut it in the real world.  If you are throwing up a proposal, you have to be able to defend it.

No, you're fucking not.  You're ignoring the citation, because the citation disagrees with your ham-fisted authoritarian views.  Also, ignoring the citation lets you wiggle out of a bad spot, which would be anything involving an actual debate, because that's not why you're here.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

AFK

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on January 21, 2013, 06:55:38 PM
This thread is about RWHN standing in the wreckage of his life and throwing poop at anyone who comes near.


Dude, aside from my kids' absent mom, my life is fucking aces right now.  Got promoted, got a fat raise, gonna be wining and dining in DC in style in a couple of weeks.  The stars are bright for me my friend!
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:59:35 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on January 21, 2013, 06:55:38 PM
This thread is about RWHN standing in the wreckage of his life and throwing poop at anyone who comes near.


Dude, aside from my kids' absent mom, my life is fucking aces right now.  Got promoted, got a fat raise, gonna be wining and dining in DC in style in a couple of weeks.  The stars are bright for me my friend!

Yeah, your ex went out for an evening.  That makes her the next fucking Eva Braun, we know.  Other than your job being described at the article you bragged about, and being nothing as high-powered as you said.  Other than the naked hostility shown to everyone around you, and the giggling about this thread killing all the other ones.  Other than you never reading any citations, because you can't really argue against the citation.

Other than all that, you're doing just fucking dandy.  So you fling poop around here to make sure that everyone's just as dandy as you.

Well done, primate!  OOK OOK!
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

AFK

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on January 21, 2013, 06:57:07 PM
No, you're fucking not.  You're ignoring the citation, because the citation disagrees with your ham-fisted authoritarian views.  Also, ignoring the citation lets you wiggle out of a bad spot, which would be anything involving an actual debate, because that's not why you're here.


Well, actually, if you look back you'll see I already stated I was in full agreement with at least oneof the articles Nigel posted, which supported a multi-faceted approach which included gun control.  So I'm afraid you are a bit off the mark. 


But the thing is, okay, maximum wage sounds good.  I mean, I certainly would not argue against that policy, in general.  But if it is being proposed as a part of reducing gun violence, you have to be able to explain how that works in your proposal.


What specifically does the maximum wage do?  Okay,so it will increase the wages for jobs.  But what about the kids engaged in gun violence who don't have jobs?  What do you do about them?
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on January 21, 2013, 06:52:04 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:51:00 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:49:03 PM
Quote from: Rev. What's-His-Name? on January 21, 2013, 06:46:54 PM
Quote from: M. Nigel Salt on January 21, 2013, 06:43:58 PM
Oh oh oh

I left out "without reviewing the existing literature on the subject".

He's like our very own Glenn Beck!


Well, since you obviously have, here is your chance to educate me.  I'm all ears.

I already posted a link to a research article about income disparity and gun violence back on page one. Read it.


I'd rather have a local expert summarize it for me.  Go ahead.

TRANSLATION:  RWHN WILL NEVER, EVER READ A SOURCE THAT DISAGREES WITH HIS OPINION.

Doktor's question:  Why is anyone giving this bitter fucking asshole what he wants?

Good question.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Salty

Quote from: Cain on January 21, 2013, 06:53:29 PM
Quote from: Alty on January 21, 2013, 06:52:19 PM
Man, I don't know why I though this thread was about guns. I feel like an asshole now.

ANYhoo, yeah.

It is now about a picture of you eating your pants.

Come on Alty, the American People demand pics.

I try to stick by my word.
http://www.imgur.com/o4vDsOs.jpeg
http://www.imgur.com/8n7m7Z8.jpeg
http://www.imgur.com/8y9USiQ.jpeg
The world is a car and you're the crash test dummy.