News:

PD.com: "the lot of you are some of the most vicious, name calling, vile examples of humanity I've had the misfortune of attempting to communicate with.  Even attempting to mimic the general mood of the place toward people who think differently leaves a slimy feel on my skin.  Reptilian, even."

Main Menu

Should kids have smartphones?

Started by Dildo Argentino, October 02, 2013, 09:45:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Anna Mae Bollocks

The thread title reminds me of CU. "Kids N Drugs", "Kids N Sex", "Kids N Sliding Down A Mountain Of Busted Beer Bottles On Your Belly"...
Scantily-Clad Inspector of Gigantic and Unnecessary Cashews, Texas Division

Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: stelz on October 03, 2013, 05:12:46 AM
The thread title reminds me of CU. "Kids N Drugs", "Kids N Sex", "Kids N Sliding Down A Mountain Of Busted Beer Bottles On Your Belly"...

Really? I only remember him as eDemocracy and hijacking the Bar and Grill. And talking about being an oppressed Englishman in Scotland.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Ben Shapiro

Not enough Nostalgia, and advocates of porn by candlelight in this thread.

Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: Twigel on October 03, 2013, 05:16:12 AM
Quote from: stelz on October 03, 2013, 05:12:46 AM
The thread title reminds me of CU. "Kids N Drugs", "Kids N Sex", "Kids N Sliding Down A Mountain Of Busted Beer Bottles On Your Belly"...

Really? I only remember him as eDemocracy and hijacking the Bar and Grill. And talking about being an oppressed Englishman in Scotland.

And him trying to show that Roger was in fact the horrible bastard out to get him and ruin Discordia via youtube video where he showed nothing more than the fact that he and Roger were PM, no content, scroll past the whole thing and when I mentioned that nothing was readable he said that our minds were made up for team Roger.

Well, yeah, at that point, my mind was made up.

Bear, you missed and awesome ass meltdown there.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Ben Shapiro


Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: Reverend What's His Bear on October 03, 2013, 05:57:45 AM
Links plz if possible?

That's some dredging. You may also have to ask Faust since he runs the server at Eris Bar and Grille, or ask hirley0, who currently runs it. And well hirley0. Love the guy, but that's some cryptography sometimes and he may well have deleted the whole thing.

Long story short, EB&G is usually a curse, why it was eventually handed over to hirley0 who exists outside of time and space.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Nephew Twiddleton

Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

I sometimes forget that happened, that it was so epic, and the amazing outcome.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: Mean Mister Nigel on October 03, 2013, 06:50:55 AM
I sometimes forget that happened, that it was so epic, and the amazing outcome.

Total. Friggin. Meltdown.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

Cain

#24
-

Dildo Argentino

Okay, so let me try for the core of the argument: in a world of ubiquitous computing and networking, involuntary boredom and lostness are being eradicated. For a number of generations, they were definitive experiences for many (I'd even say most) kids. It is quite easy to see this change as an improvement, after all, being bored and being lost are usually not pleasant. But is it also justified (at least to some degree) to see it as a deprivation? Does having to learn to cope with involuntary boredom and lostness add a sort of resilience to personalities that is lost in a universe of instantly available, infinitely variable stimulation in unlimited quantities? I have this tentative feeling (which may be an artifact of my perspective or something a little more objective than that), that this change has a tendency to make people shallow, emotionally disengaged. Is it possible to have cathartic positive experiences without ever having cathartic negative ones?
Not too keen on rigor, myself - reminds me of mortis

Reginald Ret

Quote from: holist on October 04, 2013, 12:09:25 PM
Okay, so let me try for the core of the argument: in a world of ubiquitous computing and networking, involuntary boredom and lostness are being eradicated. For a number of generations, they were definitive experiences for many (I'd even say most) kids. It is quite easy to see this change as an improvement, after all, being bored and being lost are usually not pleasant. But is it also justified (at least to some degree) to see it as a deprivation? Does having to learn to cope with involuntary boredom and lostness add a sort of resilience to personalities that is lost in a universe of instantly available, infinitely variable stimulation in unlimited quantities? I have this tentative feeling (which may be an artifact of my perspective or something a little more objective than that), that this change has a tendency to make people shallow, emotionally disengaged. Is it possible to have cathartic positive experiences without ever having cathartic negative ones?
Good point.
Combined with the decreasing number of parents that know how to say NO this leads to a generation that is incapable of tolerating frustration. You think the number of man-children around is bad now? hah! just you wait!
Lord Byron: "Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves."

Nigel saying the wisest words ever uttered: "It's just a suffix."

"The worst forum ever" "The most mediocre forum on the internet" "The dumbest forum on the internet" "The most retarded forum on the internet" "The lamest forum on the internet" "The coolest forum on the internet"

Dildo Argentino

Quote from: Doktor Blight on October 03, 2013, 01:12:09 AM
Our responsibility as the older generation to teach them to be able to use this technology unsupervised. If they don't it's our failure, as parents. It's basically the same as the time I got a bus pass from school and was given free rein, and didn't get into any trouble. My parents may have screwed up in some areas (whose doesn't?), but they at least taught me to not get myself in a bad spot if they weren't looking.

You are prefectly right. I guess my question is how to do that right with smartphones. It's quite clear that you wouldn't start teaching power-tools before good hand-to-eye coordination and concentration skills are in place, probably around 5-6, with constant supervision. Learning to drive a powered vehicle, also probably not before then. Smartphones (ubiquitous data and networking in any form) seems harmless by comparison. I am not sure it is. The effect may be more subtle than lost fingers and major injuries, but I think there is an effect, and I'd like to see more clearly what it is. By the way, this is coming from a guy whose three-year-old daughter is quite capable of navigating an iPhone and does so quite a lot, and whose older kids all have networked computers and two have smartphones and the rest could have them if they asked for them.

Quote from: Doktor Blight on October 03, 2013, 01:12:09 AM
Holist, kudos. I understand your ambivalence, but this is a good thread.

Thanks for that!
Not too keen on rigor, myself - reminds me of mortis

AFK

Quote from: Dirty Old Uncle Roger on October 02, 2013, 10:46:23 PM
Quote from: Be Kind, Please RWHNd on October 02, 2013, 10:42:13 PM
Bad idea.  It is another avenue for unsupervised and unmonitored access to the internet.  Especially given all of the Agrippa's that use the internet.

ROCKS AND BROKEN GLASS.  THAT'S ALL THEY NEED.


No, but they also don't need to be easier targets for the pedophiles that trawl the internet.  Giving a kid a smartphone does that, among other issues.  I'm not talking about your 17 and 18 year olds, certainly whn a kid gets to an age where they are driving and getting a job, I think there is certainly merit.  But your younger teens and tweens, it seems a little sketchy to me.  Get them just a plain ole cellphone without access to the net so they can still make a call in emergencies, but they don't, IMO, need smartphones.
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

Demolition Squid

Please explain to me how having a smartphone makes it any easier than having access to the internet in general.

The only reason not to do it that I can see would be that it makes the kid a slightly higher value target for muggers. Though honestly, I can't imagine it being that big an increase in the decision of whether or not to attack a child. It isn't delicious candy, after all.
Vast and Roaring Nipplebeast from the Dawn of Soho