News:

PD.com: The culmination of the 'Ted Stevens Plan'

Main Menu

String theory WTF

Started by P3nT4gR4m, January 26, 2014, 12:52:19 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

P3nT4gR4m

Okay so, fuck knows about the source but it appears legit on the surface

Reality has embedded checksums? Makes sense, if you treat the whole thing as information, I guess. It would degrade if there wasn't built in error-checking. Just thought I'd throw this out in case it's been discredited or something?

I'm up to my arse in Brexit Numpties, but I want more.  Target-rich environments are the new sexy.
Not actually a meat product.
Ass-Kicking & Foot-Stomping Ancient Master of SHIT FUCK FUCK FUCK
Awful and Bent Behemothic Results of Last Night's Painful Squat.
High Altitude Haggis-Filled Sex Bucket From Beyond Time and Space.
Internet Monkey Person of Filthy and Immoral Pygmy-Porn Wart Contagion
Octomom Auxillary Heat Exchanger Repairman
walking the fine line line between genius and batshit fucking crazy

"computation is a pattern in the spacetime arrangement of particles, and it's not the particles but the pattern that really matters! Matter doesn't matter." -- Max Tegmark

Aucoq

I remember that from a Neil deGrasse Tyson bender I went on a while back.  It's from the 2011 Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate.

I'm interested in what comes out of his observations.
"All of the world's leading theologists agree only on the notion that God hates no-fault insurance."

Horrid and Sticky Llama Wrangler of Last Week's Forbidden Desire.

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: P3nT4gR4m on January 26, 2014, 12:52:19 PM
Okay so, fuck knows about the source but it appears legit on the surface

Reality has embedded checksums? Makes sense, if you treat the whole thing as information, I guess. It would degrade if there wasn't built in error-checking. Just thought I'd throw this out in case it's been discredited or something?

Well, cell replication has built-inn checkpoints. Why not? Reality consists of persisting patterns, which means that what we find on a larger scale is often found also on a smaller scale, and vice-versa.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


LMNO

As far as I know, the math sort of works for String Theory, but the entire thing is untestable, so no one can really verify it.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on January 27, 2014, 03:02:35 PM
As far as I know, the math sort of works for String Theory, but the entire thing is untestable, so no one can really verify it.

If the math says it works, it fucking works.   :argh!:
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LMNO

"sort of" works.

Kind of like the way "multiple universes"  sort of works.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on January 27, 2014, 03:31:36 PM
"sort of" works.

Kind of like the way "multiple universes"  sort of works.

Math doesn't sort of.  It may work in a bizarre fashion, it may give you two results (one positive, one negative), but it works.  And it's never wrong.  If the math says it is so, then it is so.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LMNO

Ah, but what if you make unprovable assumptions?  Or if you say, "because Dark Energy", like that actually means something?

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on January 27, 2014, 04:08:44 PM
Ah, but what if you make unprovable assumptions?  Or if you say, "because Dark Energy", like that actually means something?

If you set up the question wrong, then the answer will be wrong, of course.  Garbage in, garbage out.  Math is like the old testament...Lots of rules, and no forgiveness.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LMNO

But multiple worlds and string theory can't both be right.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: LMNO, PhD (life continues) on January 27, 2014, 04:32:21 PM
But multiple worlds and string theory can't both be right.

I don't know enough about string theory, to be perfectly honest, to agree or disagree with that statement.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

LMNO

Hold up-- I appear to be talking out of my ass. Many Worlds can happen within String Theory, because it mainly deals with decoherence, and ST goes beneath that.

ST solves for gravity, which is cool, but it does seem the main objection is you can't make predictions with it; that is to say, it's pretty, but there's no way to be sure of it. Like the Higgs Boson, there was strong theoretical evidence for decades, but the case wasn't closed until last year.