News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Nigel: Interesting article on the way conspiracy theorists think

Started by Doktor Howl, February 25, 2015, 04:06:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Doktor Howl

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118093

excerpt:

QuoteNarratives grounded on conspiracy theories tend to reduce the complexity of reality and are able to contain the uncertainty they generate [18–20]. They are able to create a climate of disengagement from mainstream society and from officially recommended practices [21]—e.g. vaccinations, diet, etc. Despite the enthusiastic rhetoric about the collective intelligence [22, 23] the role of socio-technical system in enforcing informed debates and their effects on the public opinion still remain unclear. However, the World Economic Forum listed massive digital misinformation as one of the main risks for modern society [24].

A multitude of mechanisms animates the flow and acceptance of false rumors, which in turn create false beliefs that are rarely corrected once adopted by an individual [8, 10, 25, 26]. The process of acceptance of a claim (whether documented or not) may be altered by normative social influence or by the coherence with the system of beliefs if the individual [27, 28]. A large body of literature addresses the study of social dynamics on socio-technical systems from social contagion up to social reinforcement [12–15, 17, 29–41].

There's a hell of a lot more there, nuts & bolts stuff.  I've known for a long time that you can't talk a CTer out of their ideas, it's interesting to see why.
Molon Lube

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Oooh, this is a good one! I think I'm going to print it out.

This reminds me of something I saw... somewhere. Hank Green. I'll try to find it.

"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Mesozoic Mister Nigel

"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Doktor Howl

Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on February 25, 2015, 07:00:34 PM
Here it is! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rzxr9FeZf1g

Will watch at home tonight after the gym.  I have the sound off on my work comp, because people keep coming into my office.
Molon Lube

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Doktor Howl on February 25, 2015, 07:07:17 PM
Quote from: Mesozoic Mister Nigel on February 25, 2015, 07:00:34 PM
Here it is! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rzxr9FeZf1g

Will watch at home tonight after the gym.  I have the sound off on my work comp, because people keep coming into my office.

I know what you mean, I'm at school and none of these terminals have speakers.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."