Ignoring everything but the first page and replying anyway, lolz:
An increase in Order results in a corresponding rise in Disorder. If Australia was a seat of extreme Order, you would see extreme Disorder in response.
Since we see neither, we can conclude that Australia has not much of either Order or Disorder, and instead is full of poison, dingos, spider, and poisonous dingo-eating spiders.
Your talking about the wilderness which hasn't been tamed yet. The soil there is some of the oldest in the world, still remaining which is why it has nutrient issues with growing anything. Dude hardly anybody lives on those areas or want to. The majority of the population live in highly urbanized areas including myself, aside from a few parks with birds. I mean the places inhabited by most of the population.
Explain these issues/criticisms also:
http://philipstanfield.com/2015/04/29/australian-culture-authoritarian-conformist-shame-based-and-servile/
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/02/australia-too-boring-emigrate
Wow, I clearly underestimated your level of butthurt. I suppose that's what I get for skipping most of the thread.
You didn't answer me question/proof, what about the urbanized areas? Also it was only cause some were not willing to have any constructive discussion. I had to make my point, I'm not some kind of deity or deity incarnate who knows every single thing about this world. If I was, different story.
You didn't ask a question. Also, what the fuck are you talking about? Are you confusing me with someone else in this thread?
I said to explain these issues/criticisms in the links.
I didn't click them because I didn't your response to my original post also didn't make sense. I literally have no fucking clue what your beef is. You're posting in a purely reactionary fashion at this point.
You said "An increase in Order results in a corresponding rise in Disorder. If Australia was a seat of extreme Order, you would see extreme Disorder in response.". The increase in order already happened in the densely populated areas and I was referring to them. Extreme information censorship/anti-whistleblower laws, mass surveillance and etc.
Quick and successful stamping out of anything that interrupts the stability/non-change there including in 19th-20th century history. The strike of 1949 would have marked the end of this period of stability/non-change but it was quickly suppressed/snuffed out. It was the closest thing that came close to successfully defeating it.
So why is there no extreme disorder in response there yet in those places aside from skyrocketing housing price inflations/prices all going up which makes it near-impossible for the non-upper class to buy a house? No collapse of gov and all out-revolution? No? Its government has also never failed to suppress any sources of change/chaos that break out ever in history and they even brag about doing so in celebration days telling you to be grateful for the "peace/stability ensured".
Out of all countries its authority is literally the best in preventing chaos/radical change from taking root and happening. There are no other authorities that have rivaled it ever in that. The such effective ways it somehow prevents any change from occurring is probably close to rival the power/strength of Eris/Discordia herself, thats what I can say from research on them.