News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Sabre-rattling between surveillance technology company and Signal app founder

Started by bugmenоt, April 23, 2021, 03:13:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

bugmenоt

Cellebrite is the producer of surveillance technology used by many government agencies to quickly grab and analyze all data on an unlocked smartphone. They recently claimed to have hacked Signal. The claim was something between an overstatement and a lie, however enough to piss off its creator Moxie Marlinspike. He now claims to have found security holes in Cellebrites software which would make it possible to prepare a smartphone in a way that, if police is scanning it using Cellebrite's software, the police's computer can be compromised. This could render any gathered evidence useless in front of a court. He's also implying that he'll add that exploit to randomly selected Signal users' phones. Oh, and he claims to have found out that the software is distributed with a file owned by Apple without their consent, which could also be legally juicy.


https://signal.org/blog/cellebrite-vulnerabilities/

Faust

Awesome. Ideally if he wanted to damage cellbrite all he needs to do is publish the exploit. They would mitigate it but the damage would already be done reputationally .

Seperately if he is able to filter their scan techniques from general traffic, he could make a data poison app that every single phone scanned would get flagged for suspicious behaviour rendering the technique invalid in court also
Sleepless nights at the chateau