This has to be one of the most reckless moves made by
Republicans any political party anywhere in recent years. Playing politics with terrorism is bad enough, but at least the stakes there are relatively low. Low compared to the stakes when you're talking about nuclear weapons, anyway:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/131413-kyl-tax-deal-needs-to-get-done-by-monday-to-pass-start-in-lame-duck
QuoteKyl said if negotiators don't reach a deal on the Bush taxes within a week "then you're not going to have time to do START."... The emerging conventional wisdom has been that Senate Republicans would agree to ratify START if Obama and Democratic leaders agreed to a temporary extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.
If the Russians get screwed by the American government again, they're probably never going to have a leader as compliant and pro-Western as Dmitry Medvedev ever again. The ex-KGB types will revert back to their 1993 stance of extreme paranoia and distrust, and anyone approaching the Presidential seat will have to share that viewpoint. They're not going to allow another Boris Yeltsin to piss away the work they've done in the last decade.
Quote from: Cain on December 02, 2010, 07:40:30 AM
This has to be one of the most reckless moves made by Republicans any political party anywhere in recent years. Playing politics with terrorism is bad enough, but at least the stakes there are relatively low. Low compared to the stakes when you're talking about nuclear weapons, anyway:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/131413-kyl-tax-deal-needs-to-get-done-by-monday-to-pass-start-in-lame-duck
QuoteKyl said if negotiators don't reach a deal on the Bush taxes within a week "then you're not going to have time to do START."... The emerging conventional wisdom has been that Senate Republicans would agree to ratify START if Obama and Democratic leaders agreed to a temporary extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.
If the Russians get screwed by the American government again, they're probably never going to have a leader as compliant and pro-Western as Dmitry Medvedev ever again. The ex-KGB types will revert back to their 1993 stance of extreme paranoia and distrust, and anyone approaching the Presidential seat will have to share that viewpoint. They're not going to allow another Boris Yeltsin to piss away the work they've done in the last decade.
Yeah, but Obama might be a
Muslim.
Quote from: postvex™ on December 02, 2010, 12:45:34 PM
Quote from: Cain on December 02, 2010, 07:40:30 AM
This has to be one of the most reckless moves made by Republicans any political party anywhere in recent years. Playing politics with terrorism is bad enough, but at least the stakes there are relatively low. Low compared to the stakes when you're talking about nuclear weapons, anyway:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/131413-kyl-tax-deal-needs-to-get-done-by-monday-to-pass-start-in-lame-duck
QuoteKyl said if negotiators don't reach a deal on the Bush taxes within a week "then you're not going to have time to do START."... The emerging conventional wisdom has been that Senate Republicans would agree to ratify START if Obama and Democratic leaders agreed to a temporary extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.
If the Russians get screwed by the American government again, they're probably never going to have a leader as compliant and pro-Western as Dmitry Medvedev ever again. The ex-KGB types will revert back to their 1993 stance of extreme paranoia and distrust, and anyone approaching the Presidential seat will have to share that viewpoint. They're not going to allow another Boris Yeltsin to piss away the work they've done in the last decade.
Yeah, but Obama might be a Muslim. rich people need more money.
Fixed. But honestly I'm not surprised. Republicans filibuster everything. It's retarded. And they don't care about Russia. As a matter of fact it probably suits their purposes to have tensions with Russia again. They get elected through fear and paranoia.
Quote from: Cain on December 02, 2010, 07:40:30 AM
This has to be one of the most reckless moves made by Republicans any political party anywhere in recent years. Playing politics with terrorism is bad enough, but at least the stakes there are relatively low. Low compared to the stakes when you're talking about nuclear weapons, anyway:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/131413-kyl-tax-deal-needs-to-get-done-by-monday-to-pass-start-in-lame-duck
QuoteKyl said if negotiators don't reach a deal on the Bush taxes within a week "then you're not going to have time to do START."... The emerging conventional wisdom has been that Senate Republicans would agree to ratify START if Obama and Democratic leaders agreed to a temporary extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.
If the Russians get screwed by the American government again, they're probably never going to have a leader as compliant and pro-Western as Dmitry Medvedev ever again. The ex-KGB types will revert back to their 1993 stance of extreme paranoia and distrust, and anyone approaching the Presidential seat will have to share that viewpoint. They're not going to allow another Boris Yeltsin to piss away the work they've done in the last decade.
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK.
That is all.
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 02, 2010, 03:04:37 PM
Quote from: postvex™ on December 02, 2010, 12:45:34 PM
Quote from: Cain on December 02, 2010, 07:40:30 AM
This has to be one of the most reckless moves made by Republicans any political party anywhere in recent years. Playing politics with terrorism is bad enough, but at least the stakes there are relatively low. Low compared to the stakes when you're talking about nuclear weapons, anyway:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/131413-kyl-tax-deal-needs-to-get-done-by-monday-to-pass-start-in-lame-duck
QuoteKyl said if negotiators don't reach a deal on the Bush taxes within a week "then you're not going to have time to do START."... The emerging conventional wisdom has been that Senate Republicans would agree to ratify START if Obama and Democratic leaders agreed to a temporary extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.
If the Russians get screwed by the American government again, they're probably never going to have a leader as compliant and pro-Western as Dmitry Medvedev ever again. The ex-KGB types will revert back to their 1993 stance of extreme paranoia and distrust, and anyone approaching the Presidential seat will have to share that viewpoint. They're not going to allow another Boris Yeltsin to piss away the work they've done in the last decade.
Yeah, but Obama might be a Muslim. rich people need more money.
Fixed. But honestly I'm not surprised. Republicans filibuster everything. It's retarded. And they don't care about Russia. As a matter of fact it probably suits their purposes to have tensions with Russia again. They get elected through fear and paranoia.
THIS is the correct GOP Motorcycle, powered by fear and paranoia. Hey, its green energy!
Quote from: Ratatosk on December 02, 2010, 03:24:20 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 02, 2010, 03:04:37 PM
Quote from: postvex™ on December 02, 2010, 12:45:34 PM
Quote from: Cain on December 02, 2010, 07:40:30 AM
This has to be one of the most reckless moves made by Republicans any political party anywhere in recent years. Playing politics with terrorism is bad enough, but at least the stakes there are relatively low. Low compared to the stakes when you're talking about nuclear weapons, anyway:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/131413-kyl-tax-deal-needs-to-get-done-by-monday-to-pass-start-in-lame-duck
QuoteKyl said if negotiators don't reach a deal on the Bush taxes within a week "then you're not going to have time to do START."... The emerging conventional wisdom has been that Senate Republicans would agree to ratify START if Obama and Democratic leaders agreed to a temporary extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.
If the Russians get screwed by the American government again, they're probably never going to have a leader as compliant and pro-Western as Dmitry Medvedev ever again. The ex-KGB types will revert back to their 1993 stance of extreme paranoia and distrust, and anyone approaching the Presidential seat will have to share that viewpoint. They're not going to allow another Boris Yeltsin to piss away the work they've done in the last decade.
Yeah, but Obama might be a Muslim. rich people need more money.
Fixed. But honestly I'm not surprised. Republicans filibuster everything. It's retarded. And they don't care about Russia. As a matter of fact it probably suits their purposes to have tensions with Russia again. They get elected through fear and paranoia.
THIS is the correct GOP Motorcycle, powered by fear and paranoia. Hey, its green energy!
:lulz:
Russia will have to build up its nuclear forces if the United States fails to ratify the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty the two countries signed this year, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin warns in an upcoming CNN interview.
"That's not our choice. We don't want that to happen. But this is not a threat on our part," Putin told CNN's Larry King in an interview to air Wednesday. "We've been simply saying that this is what all of us expects to happen if we don't agree on a joint effort there."
http://articles.cnn.com/2010-11-30/world/putin.interview_1_nuclear-arsenal-prime-minister-vladimir-putin-nuclear-warheads?_s=PM:WORLD
And, as history shows, that will lead to a security dilemma (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_Dilemma), which just makes the likelihood of something stupid happening and a ridiculous escalation in hostilities that more possible.
On the other hand the Defense contractors are dancing in the streets.
Quote from: Cain on December 02, 2010, 05:12:40 PM
And, as history shows, that will lead to a security dilemma (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_Dilemma), which just makes the likelihood of something stupid happening and a ridiculous escalation in hostilities that more possible.
Well, I've always said I missed the Cold War. Looks like I might get to see it again.
Quote from: Charley Brown on December 02, 2010, 05:16:21 PM
On the other hand the Defense contractors are dancing in the streets.
GOP's secret economic plan :lulz:
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 02, 2010, 05:17:54 PM
Quote from: Cain on December 02, 2010, 05:12:40 PM
And, as history shows, that will lead to a security dilemma (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_Dilemma), which just makes the likelihood of something stupid happening and a ridiculous escalation in hostilities that more possible.
Well, I've always said I missed the Cold War. Looks like I might get to see it again.
Quote from: Charley Brown on December 02, 2010, 05:16:21 PM
On the other hand the Defense contractors are dancing in the streets.
GOP's secret economic plan backroom deal :lulz:
Well, on the up side it will create jobs! I can see 1200 new jobs right away to "update" and "reinforce" our nuclear arsenal against the Red Threat™.
And of course it will be Russia's fault for the escalation. Brilliant!
The entire geopolitical face could alter practically overnight. China would be forced to back North Korea even more and I suppose it is possible that Russia would then consider helping Iran with their nuclear program. India would take some action as well. Destabalization all around.
Quote from: Charley Brown on December 02, 2010, 05:41:28 PM
The entire geopolitical face could alter practically overnight. China would be forced to back North Korea even more and I suppose it is possible that Russia would then consider helping Iran with their nuclear program. India would take some action as well. Destabalization all around.
Shit, you're right.
What the fuck has the start treaty got to do with tax cuts?
This is nothing more then blackmail by one Senator right?
Expand that to "one political party" and you've got it.
The Republican Party is extremely uncooperative and play partisan politics whenever they get the chance. They're basically a bunch of brats who throw tantrums and tell ghost stories to get their way. Unfortunately, Democrats are a bunch of anemic pussies who think they can get stuff done by playing nice with them when instead they should have told them to sit down, shut up and do their fucking job for the past 2 years.
Essentially, yeah, they're not above the whole "hey we're not going to help you with this more important nonpartisan thing that's in the world's best interest until you give into our retarded pet project that only benefits a small segment of our population" sort of tactics.
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 02, 2010, 07:16:39 PM
The Republican Party is extremely uncooperative and play partisan politics whenever they get the chance. They're basically a bunch of brats who throw tantrums and tell ghost stories to get their way. Unfortunately, Democrats are a bunch of anemic pussies who think they can get stuff done by playing nice with them when instead they should have told them to sit down, shut up and do their fucking job for the past 2 years.
Essentially, yeah, they're not above the whole "hey we're not going to help you with this more important nonpartisan thing that's in the world's best interest until you give into our retarded pet project that only benefits a small segment of our population us and most of our buddies." sort of tactics.
Fixed another one for you.
Quote from: Charley Brown on December 02, 2010, 07:25:18 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 02, 2010, 07:16:39 PM
The Republican Party is extremely uncooperative and play partisan politics whenever they get the chance. They're basically a bunch of brats who throw tantrums and tell ghost stories to get their way. Unfortunately, Democrats are a bunch of anemic pussies who think they can get stuff done by playing nice with them when instead they should have told them to sit down, shut up and do their fucking job for the past 2 years.
Essentially, yeah, they're not above the whole "hey we're not going to help you with this more important nonpartisan thing that's in the world's best interest until you give into our retarded pet project that only benefits a small segment of our population us and most of our buddies." sort of tactics.
Fixed another one for you.
Ah, thanks, I'm not 100% on the ball today.
Quote from: Faust on December 02, 2010, 07:06:37 PM
What the fuck has the start treaty got to do with tax cuts?
This is nothing more then blackmail by one Senator right?
A GOP aide admitted this was pure out blackmail in National Review
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/254182/devils-bargain-temporary-tax-cut-extension-new-start-daniel-foster
Extortion, not blackmail.
(Sorry for the pedantry, this one is a pet peeve of mine).
Quote from: Charley Brown on December 02, 2010, 05:29:55 PM
Well, on the up side it will create jobs! I can see 1200 new jobs right away to "update" and "reinforce" our nuclear arsenal against the Red Threat™.
Ehmmm jobs paid for by taxmoney aren't actually any good for the economy.
You see, when a govt spends more they need to either borrow more, print money or increase taxes.
Borrowed money just leaves the next generation fucked;
printing money causes inflation meaning that everything gets more expensive;
and increasing taxes fucks the economy and consequently people lose their jobs.
So 1200 people get a job and an already mortally wounded economy takes another kick in the nuts.
Yeah, it was tongue in cheek.
ah, didn't catch that.
Sorry for understimating you.
Quote from: Regret on December 02, 2010, 10:48:09 PM
ah, didn't catch that.
Sorry for understimating you.
No problem, didn't express myself well. Add in Reaganomics which was based on deficit spending and all comes clear.
Quote from: Requia ☣ on December 02, 2010, 08:56:57 PM
Extortion, not blackmail.
(Sorry for the pedantry, this one is a pet peeve of mine).
You need to loosen the clamps on your underpance.
Just saying.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 03, 2010, 03:28:49 PM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on December 02, 2010, 08:56:57 PM
Extortion, not blackmail.
(Sorry for the pedantry, this one is a pet peeve of mine).
You need to loosen the clamps on your underpance.
Just saying.
Vice grips, not clamps.
Sorry, I'm pretty picky about this sort of stuff.
Quote from: LMNO, PhD on December 03, 2010, 03:30:22 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 03, 2010, 03:28:49 PM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on December 02, 2010, 08:56:57 PM
Extortion, not blackmail.
(Sorry for the pedantry, this one is a pet peeve of mine).
You need to loosen the clamps on your underpance.
Just saying.
Vice grips, not clamps.
Sorry, I'm pretty picky about this sort of stuff.
:lulz:
Wow, the GOP has found a nice way to get their tax cuts extended. Who'd have thought the Republicans would be willing to sabotage international affairs with Russia over such trivial reasoning...
But in all seriousness, the Republics know the Democrats will be willing to extend the tax cuts in order to keep good ties with Russia and follow the START. At this point it would make the Democrats even worse than the Republicans if they refused. The Democrats can still stand the bigger man if they suck up some pride in order to avoid potentially dangerous conflict.
No. The democrats need to tell the republicans to go to hell. This will *never* stop otherwise.
Of course, that's assuming the democrats actually want to disagree with the republicans, I'm not entirely convinced of that.
Quote from: Persona Facade on December 03, 2010, 05:24:24 PM
Wow, the GOP has found a nice way to get their tax cuts extended. Who'd have thought the Republicans would be willing to sabotage international affairs with Russia over such trivial reasoning...
But in all seriousness, the Republics know the Democrats will be willing to extend the tax cuts in order to keep good ties with Russia and follow the START. At this point it would make the Democrats even worse than the Republicans if they refused. The Democrats can still stand the bigger man if they suck up some pride in order to avoid potentially dangerous conflict.
This sort of sissiness is exactly why the spineless dems got tossed out last month.
That said, the Dems should have found a spine before the GOP starting fucking around with international nuclear arms controls.
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 03, 2010, 03:35:53 PM
Quote from: LMNO, PhD on December 03, 2010, 03:30:22 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 03, 2010, 03:28:49 PM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on December 02, 2010, 08:56:57 PM
Extortion, not blackmail.
(Sorry for the pedantry, this one is a pet peeve of mine).
You need to loosen the clamps on your underpance.
Just saying.
Vice grips, not clamps.
Sorry, I'm pretty picky about this sort of stuff.
:lulz:
Ahahahahaha
Here we are, Roger. Amirite?
Quote from: LMNO, PhD on December 03, 2010, 03:30:22 PM
Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on December 03, 2010, 03:28:49 PM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on December 02, 2010, 08:56:57 PM
Extortion, not blackmail.
(Sorry for the pedantry, this one is a pet peeve of mine).
You need to loosen the clamps on your underpance.
Just saying.
Vice grips, not clamps.
Sorry, I'm pretty picky about this sort of stuff.
both wrong. It would be vices. Not that I am picky about this or thing. Just trying to help ya two out, ya know.
Quote from: Cain on December 03, 2010, 08:08:44 PM
That said, the Dems should have found a spine before the GOP starting fucking around with international nuclear arms controls.
It's safe to say that both Democrats and Republicans take part in their share of spineless tactics in order to push their agenda. For better or for worse this does not make them any less effective.
Quote from: Persona Facade on December 04, 2010, 02:27:28 AM
Quote from: Cain on December 03, 2010, 08:08:44 PM
That said, the Dems should have found a spine before the GOP starting fucking around with international nuclear arms controls.
It's safe to say that both Democrats and Republicans take part in their share of spineless tactics in order to push their agenda. For better or for worse this does not make them any less effective.
Doesn't make them any MORE effective either.
AIPAC has decided it now supports Senator Kyl, despite the fact if America ratifies New START it will bring Russia on board to deal with Iran's nuclear program, thus working to the benefit of Israel and improving its security.
LOL AIPAC.
Quote from: Cain on December 04, 2010, 04:09:37 AM
AIPAC has decided it now supports Senator Kyl, despite the fact if America ratifies New START it will bring Russia on board to deal with Iran's nuclear program, thus working to the benefit of Israel and improving its security.
LOL AIPAC.
:facepalm:
Quote from: Doktor Blight on December 04, 2010, 04:19:43 AM
Quote from: Cain on December 04, 2010, 04:09:37 AM
AIPAC has decided it now supports Senator Kyl, despite the fact if America ratifies New START it will bring Russia on board to deal with Iran's nuclear program, thus working to the benefit of Israel and improving its security.
LOL AIPAC.
:facepalm:
Seconded.
In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the nukes
Quote from: Pēleus on December 04, 2010, 05:01:42 AM
In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the nukes
\
(http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b390/tyleradams/scarface.jpg)
Fixed.
Quote from: Pēleus on December 04, 2010, 05:01:42 AM
In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the nukes
I am confused by your avatar? Is that your face? Under all the hair that is there?
Quote from: Nigel on December 04, 2010, 06:35:43 AM
Quote from: Pēleus on December 04, 2010, 05:01:42 AM
In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the nukes
I am confused by your avatar? Is that your face? Under all the hair that is there?
It looks like the guy that played Lister in Red Dwarf.
I'm sure he's done other stuff, but that's where I know him from.
ETA: His title "The last human being" seems to go along with that theory.
Quote from: Jerry_Frankster on December 04, 2010, 07:07:21 AM
Quote from: Nigel on December 04, 2010, 06:35:43 AM
Quote from: Pēleus on December 04, 2010, 05:01:42 AM
In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the nukes
I am confused by your avatar? Is that your face? Under all the hair that is there?
It looks like the guy that played Lister in Red Dwarf.
I'm sure he's done other stuff, but that's where I know him from.
ETA: His title "The last human being" seems to go along with that theory.
None of what you are saying makes any sense to me. :?
Quote from: Nigel on December 04, 2010, 07:12:23 AM
Quote from: Jerry_Frankster on December 04, 2010, 07:07:21 AM
Quote from: Nigel on December 04, 2010, 06:35:43 AM
Quote from: Pēleus on December 04, 2010, 05:01:42 AM
In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the nukes
I am confused by your avatar? Is that your face? Under all the hair that is there?
It looks like the guy that played Lister in Red Dwarf.
I'm sure he's done other stuff, but that's where I know him from.
ETA: His title "The last human being" seems to go along with that theory.
None of what you are saying makes any sense to me. :?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Dwarf
Best. Sci-fi. Britcom. Ever.
Quote from: Jerry_Frankster on December 04, 2010, 07:15:36 AM
Best. Sci-fi. Britcom. Ever.
I feel compelled to watch it now.
To be fair, the only other contenders for the title are Blake's 7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakes_7) and Threads (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads)
Quote from: Cain on December 04, 2010, 07:27:28 AM
To be fair, the only other contenders for the title are Blake's 7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakes_7) and Threads (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads)
Those both sound pretty good.
How could anything written by the guy who invented Daleks not be awesome?
BTW, what kind of condiment are the antagonists in Blake's 7 shaped like?
Packets of duck sauce.
Both are actually excellent programs, its just sci-fi in the UK tends towards the dystopian.
Quote from: Cain on December 04, 2010, 07:27:28 AM
To be fair, the only other contenders for the title are Blake's 7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakes_7) and Threads (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads)
The prisoner! It was fan fucking tastic
Quote from: Faust on December 04, 2010, 10:24:58 AM
Quote from: Cain on December 04, 2010, 07:27:28 AM
To be fair, the only other contenders for the title are Blake's 7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakes_7) and Threads (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads)
The prisoner! It was fan fucking tastic
Second the original Prisoner. Saw it as a young youngling, didn't get it _at all_ for a while. Weather balloons EAT people.
Quote from: Jerry_Frankster on December 04, 2010, 07:15:36 AM
Best. Sci-fi. Britcom. Ever.
Ehhh when does it become such?
From all the stuff I heard about it, I started watching it from Season 1, and, well, it was sorta funny, but also often enough sort of boring and stupid that I never really got further than S02 or S03 or something.
Heh, I thought the same thing after watching 10 minutes of The IT Crowd the other day.
I guess it's just a matter of personal taste.
Quote from: Triple Zero on December 04, 2010, 11:13:29 AM
Quote from: Jerry_Frankster on December 04, 2010, 07:15:36 AM
Best. Sci-fi. Britcom. Ever.
Ehhh when does it become such?
From all the stuff I heard about it, I started watching it from Season 1, and, well, it was sorta funny, but also often enough sort of boring and stupid that I never really got further than S02 or S03 or something.
It gets kind of depressing for a while, then it has a great episode about the gunslingers of the apocalypse. Then there is a good episode where they get Kennedy to assassinate himself.
I loved the show as a kid but as time went by it became less funny. There are a few brilliant episodes dotted throughout it but they are few and far between.
Quote from: Nigel on December 04, 2010, 07:12:23 AM
Quote from: Jerry_Frankster on December 04, 2010, 07:07:21 AM
Quote from: Nigel on December 04, 2010, 06:35:43 AM
Quote from: Pēleus on December 04, 2010, 05:01:42 AM
In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the nukes
I am confused by your avatar? Is that your face? Under all the hair that is there?
It looks like the guy that played Lister in Red Dwarf.
I'm sure he's done other stuff, but that's where I know him from.
ETA: His title "The last human being" seems to go along with that theory.
None of what you are saying makes any sense to me. :?
Peleus' avatar is a character from a show called Red Dwarf.
Thanks guys! :)
Quote from: Jerry_Frankster on December 04, 2010, 11:41:46 AM
Heh, I thought the same thing after watching 10 minutes of The IT Crowd the other day.
I guess it's just a matter of personal taste.
IT Crowd I got into after only a few episodes, I really watched a lot of Red Dwarf before I gave it up. There's only a few comedies that I really enjoyed straight from the beginning (How I Met Your Mother and Big Bang Theory to name recent ones).
According to Wikipedia:
QuoteNazarro agreed that "the first two series are very original and very funny", but went on to say that "it wasn't until series III that the show hit its stride."
FWIW, I watched a little further into The same episode of The IT crowd I was watching earlier, and it got a little better.
Prisoner remake is better if you think of it as a sequl, still the old one is more classic with itsvictorian village rather then the base housing. Still cool to see the jammers referanced during the show.
Red dwarf, last season is a fucking riot when they get locked up in the ship's jail and the giant robot who thinks its a chicken. I think hipster in nigel would probally find the cat as the best role.