...because it means he can explain how he knows Bradley Manning is guilty (http://www.boingboing.net/2011/04/22/obama-declares-bradl.html?dlvrit=36761) when a court has not yet convicted him of any crimes.
Quote from: El PresidenteWe're a nation of laws. We don't let individuals make their own decisions about how the laws operate. He broke the law.
Note: The White House is now complaining that Obama's comments were taken entirely the wrong way by nasty-minded media peoples, and (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/53601_Page2.html#ixzz1KMlT6PFZ) that:
Quote"making a general statement that did not go specifically to the charges against Manning: 'The president was emphasizing that, in general, the unauthorized release of classified information is not a lawful act,' [a White House spokesman said] Friday night. 'He was not expressing a view as to the guilt or innocence of Pfc. Manning specifically'."
Or, he said with absolute clarity "he broke the law". Which has some hilarious legal implications, such as throwing the possibility of any kind of fair trial into the realms of fantasy. Not that this will stop a prosecution, mind.
Might be good to move to the UK one of these days. Hey, at least they have a CONSTITUTIONAL monarchy. We just have the old fashioned type.
-Joh'Nyx,
"eagerly" awaiting the joys and blessings of the 2012 election
I dont think its that he preemptively condemned him. What I think happened is that he already knows the result of MAnnings "Trial" and he spoiled the ending for everyone.
He should have used spoiler tags!
\
:argh!:
Quote from: - on April 24, 2011, 05:49:39 PM
...because it means he can explain how he knows Bradley Manning is guilty (http://www.boingboing.net/2011/04/22/obama-declares-bradl.html?dlvrit=36761) when a court has not yet convicted him of any crimes.
Quote from: El PresidenteWe're a nation of laws. We don't let individuals make their own decisions about how the laws operate. He broke the law.
Note: The White House is now complaining that Obama's comments were taken entirely the wrong way by nasty-minded media peoples, and (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0411/53601_Page2.html#ixzz1KMlT6PFZ) that:
Quote"making a general statement that did not go specifically to the charges against Manning: 'The president was emphasizing that, in general, the unauthorized release of classified information is not a lawful act,' [a White House spokesman said] Friday night. 'He was not expressing a view as to the guilt or innocence of Pfc. Manning specifically'."
Or, he said with absolute clarity "he broke the law". Which has some hilarious legal implications, such as throwing the possibility of any kind of fair trial into the realms of fantasy. Not that this will stop a prosecution, mind.
They'd have to
start a prosecution before anything could stop it.
Manning's going to be treated no differently than any of the innocent people picked up by the government in the War on Civil Rights Terror and held for years without being charged with anything. They'll do everything they can to avoid actually trying him for as long as possible so they can keep him out of sight/mind of the public, and then they'll railroad him in some military circus act whenever they get around to it.
Dude's the biggest American hero in decades, and he'll burn for it.
Quote from: Laughin Jude on April 25, 2011, 06:59:22 AM
Dude's the biggest American hero in decades, and he'll burn for it.
This is a fairly predictable pattern.
Quote from: ϗ, M.S. on April 24, 2011, 06:29:14 PM
Might be good to move to the UK one of these days. Hey, at least they have a CONSTITUTIONAL monarchy. We just have the old fashioned type.
I think you should go look up the definition of monarchy.