Principia Discordia

Principia Discordia => Apple Talk => Topic started by: hirley0 on November 14, 2013, 12:30:37 AM

Title: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 14, 2013, 12:30:37 AM
    (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5c/Phobos_colour_2008.jpg/200px-Phobos_colour_2008.jpg)             (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8d/Deimos-MRO.jpg/200px-Deimos-MRO.jpg)
Color image of Phobos (MRO, 23 March 2008).  Color image of Deimos (MRO, 21 February 2009).
Phobos (panic/fear)  Both satellites were discovered in 1877 by Asaph Hall Deimos (terror/dread)
10.8×10^15 9,377 km  period (h)7.66   |    2×10^15 23,460 km 30.35h
27 by 22 by 18 km ?=10.5K Km^3
10.8×10^15 / 10.5K Km^3 =naOK#
Mass:  10,658,529,896,187,200 kg
/ Volume:  5,729 km3  =1.86e12kg/1e9m3 = 1.86e6Kg/M3 =1860kg/cm3:
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cfm?Object=Mar_Phobos

(http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimedia/gallery/PhobosJupiter160X120(3)1.jpg)

(http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimedia/gallery/Phobos%20and%20Deimos732X5201.jpg)
as seen from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's low orbit around Mars.
taken at 0119 UTC on 23 October 2007 (9:19 p.m. EDT on Oct. 22),
Phobos orbits Mars in a shorter time than Mars' 24 hour, 37.4-minute period
appear to rise in the west and set in the east.
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimedia/display.cfm?Category=Planets&IM_ID=5823
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Suu on November 14, 2013, 12:52:34 AM
Phobos and Dimo!

Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on November 14, 2013, 12:58:34 AM
I'd live there.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 14, 2013, 01:10:01 AM
Yesterday Tuesday at 12:34 My Car Rot rocket left its launch
site for the 3 targets of Mars 2 moons & A no name dust particle   tbc

Quote from: Suu on November 14, 2013, 12:52:34 AM
Phobos and Dimo!

Natch, U: UNderstand Dime 0 as well as any 5:10 PM pdT
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/mars/moons.html
(http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/mars/phobos.gif)  .<dust (http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr161/lect/mars/deimos.jpg)
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 14, 2013, 01:15:48 AM
I, will assume U did find a phone:: & were able to cash in on that fact.

a good bit of detective work {clearly), & art you may be very cleaver at

CONgratulations: /-/.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 14, 2013, 01:17:44 AM
5:32pm Phobos radius =11.1 km
The most prominent surface feature is the crater Stickney?
Now bac2CAR  Rot & Dime No {the name i gave dust part
(https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/images/PHOBOS_520x369.jpg)
THUS it appears clear to me that the big crater "?" had enough energy to
cause a Big flake to crack  | however it remains attached / in place for
some reason? tbc {Maybe {{ subject 2 ???
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 14, 2013, 01:54:47 AM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on November 14, 2013, 12:58:34 AM
I'd live there.

Actually, once we start thinking about building actual starships, Phobos and Deimos would be ideal places to build them. You could have raw materials and manufacturing on Mars, and have Phobos and Deimos act as the shipyards. In order to do that, all three would need to be inhabited. The upshot is that there's no life on Mars, so we can strip mine it and pollute the already mostly carbon dioxide atmosphere all we want.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on November 14, 2013, 02:34:21 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 14, 2013, 01:54:47 AM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on November 14, 2013, 12:58:34 AM
I'd live there.

Actually, once we start thinking about building actual starships, Phobos and Deimos would be ideal places to build them. You could have raw materials and manufacturing on Mars, and have Phobos and Deimos act as the shipyards. In order to do that, all three would need to be inhabited. The upshot is that there's no life on Mars, so we can strip mine it and pollute the already mostly carbon dioxide atmosphere all we want.

I call dibs on Deimos!
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 14, 2013, 02:36:31 AM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on November 14, 2013, 02:34:21 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 14, 2013, 01:54:47 AM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on November 14, 2013, 12:58:34 AM
I'd live there.

Actually, once we start thinking about building actual starships, Phobos and Deimos would be ideal places to build them. You could have raw materials and manufacturing on Mars, and have Phobos and Deimos act as the shipyards. In order to do that, all three would need to be inhabited. The upshot is that there's no life on Mars, so we can strip mine it and pollute the already mostly carbon dioxide atmosphere all we want.

I call dibs on Deimos!

You may have to fight Dimo for it. Or if he clones himself, you may have to fight Dimos for it.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Payne on November 14, 2013, 03:08:37 AM
I demand that Phobos has a crazed Russian Anarcho-Technocrat living on it, with a "Science Lab" and a big mahoosive laser.

Pretty much like Kim Stanley Robinson and my abortive "World Ship" game setting predicted.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 14, 2013, 04:30:23 AM
Quote from: Payne on November 14, 2013, 03:08:37 AM
I demand that Phobos has a crazed Russian Anarcho-Technocrat living on it, with a "Science Lab" and a big mahoosive laser.

Pretty much like Kim Stanley Robinson and my abortive "World Ship" game setting predicted.

The huge wonkin' crater would be great for the business end of the laser.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 14, 2013, 08:58:51 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 14, 2013, 01:54:47 AM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on November 14, 2013, 12:58:34 AM
I'd live there.

Actually,  there's no life on Mars,

12:47-?
i RATHER DOUBT THIS My guess is that there is
My guess is Mars was Millions if not Billions of years ahead of Earth?
that Life evolved Much the same as Earth only much faster
as the water left the surface Life on Mars had to readjust to
underground? Much as Earth has the Satellite WEB MARS May have
Something similar underground  {AI) & intensely advanced of Earth
visa's required on the Planet / /\/ot4 the moons however 12:58
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 14, 2013, 09:13:45 PM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 14, 2013, 08:58:51 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 14, 2013, 01:54:47 AM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on November 14, 2013, 12:58:34 AM
I'd live there.

Actually,  there's no life on Mars,

12:47-?
i RATHER DOUBT THIS My guess is that there is
My guess is Mars was Millions if not Billions of years ahead of Earth?
that Life evolved Much the same as Earth only much faster
as the water left the surface Life on Mars had to readjust to
underground? Much as Earth has the Satellite WEB MARS May have
Something similar underground  {AI) & intensely advanced of Earth
visa's required on the Planet / /\/ot4 the moons however 12:58

You have a point there but there is no evidence for it, and it would most certainly be microbial, probably not even eukaryotic. It's entirely possible. Water bears on Earth can survive temperatures near absolute zero and IIRC can be dehydrated for several years and just go dormant. I think that Mars once had life, but I reckon its all extinct now. I could be wrong but we would have to demonstrate subterranean (submartial?) liquid water to make that more plausible.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 14, 2013, 09:16:43 PM
1-2pm in search of ????/ from Phobos period 7.66(h)ours
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/target/Phobos
(http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/thumb/PIA10371.jpg) (http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA10371.jpg) (http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA01332.jpg)(http://i.space.com/images/i/000/022/208/i02/mars-rover-curiosity-crescent-moon-phobos-full.jpg?1348761099)
while you were typi 1:21
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 14, 2013, 09:13:45 PM
You have a point
i doubt this also{there is no evidence for it
Bed Bugs aRe all the "evidence" i need{ THOSE in
u mean: retaliation for curiosity {yeah?yeah) = start of inner planet Wars

Look if BB's aRe from Mars | it is very reasonable to me that is the case
they (AI)/Mars } far far ahead of anything EartThings can eveN think of

http://www.space.com/17790-mars-rover-curiosity-phobos-moon-photo.html
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 15, 2013, 08:39:44 AM
(http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/images/mep/allaboutmars/p4_sm.gif)      (http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/images/mep/allaboutmars/p3_sm.gif)    (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_marte/marte15_03.jpg)
Hall crater on Phobos.  Largest crater Stickney   Last picture transmitted
   diameter 6 km              diameter 10 km    by Phobos-2 25 March 1989
              the ill-fated Soviet Mars probe Phobos-2.
:fnord: Mars Global Surveyor  (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/marsurv.html) {about March, 1999
(http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_marte/marte21_02.gif)
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/marte/marte_phobos02.htm
(http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_marte/marte15_10.jpg)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_program   http://www.phobos2.com/
http://www.phobos2.com/images/55103h_ani.gif
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 15, 2013, 03:52:10 PM
?" a point there but there is no evidence for it "?

0K Let me try the gravity approach? if i May?
the number i came up with for Kg/cc
does suggest the suggestion
Phobos is hollow
May be
TRUE?


Quote from: hirley0 on November 14, 2013, 12:30:37 AM
Mass:  10,658,529,896,187,200 kg ? 27 by 22 by 18 km in diameter.=10.7K
/ Volume:  5,729 km3  =1.86e12kg/1e9m3 = 1.86e6Kg/M3 =1860kg/cm3:
    http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cfm?Object=Mar_Phobos

~" Measurements of Phobos' orbit and density, tell us that it is HOLLOW "~
    ^ http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/marte/marte_phobos02.htm ^
IF it were possible to retard the motion I WOULD
(http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/imagenes_marte/marte21_02.gif)  the gravity wave produced is of interest:
todays conclusion WAS it rotates CCW not CW ?7.66Hr = 460Min\360 =
18/23 ABOUT 3 DEGREES IN 4Min
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 15, 2013, 03:55:36 PM
7:55
0K My admitted Li D'LuSHunALL acount of phobo birth
it was an Astoid:? Look in my version B4 there was
an astroid there was a planet AsTry m v e mARSFELLOW A
THE FITH OUT FROM THE SUN. IT {AsTry was blasted to
bits in a war between MarsFellow & AsTry. MarsFellow
was obliterated | no trace left in the solar system
ONLY MarsFellows Moon Mars, where THE MarsFellowian
Rements evacuate to durring/AFTER the WAR.
WHEN? the "MarsFellowian"'s blasted AsTry to bits
IT {"AsTry (centeral) bits" {Astroid ({phobo})
were Molten hot? the St crater blow caused the
molten middel of p to spert out the far side +>(=)->
Leaving the center hollow. so its a natural holo-
sphere not man made | other than the result of MF
blast2bits of AsTry
THUS: THERE EXISTS:  a natural dwelling place
good for a few million more years, & all that
need be done is land on the far side and clear
the passage which no doubt is mostly blocked
by fallen rocks
So task #1 is to open the portal & get on with
the program | No Visa Required | its an Astroid
& the MF_n's have no more claim to it than
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 15, 2013, 03:56:17 PM
7:56
BESIDES THAT:  the sending of a probe to Phobos
makes about as much sense as G. Wash to Phillipeans
Look? something is Rong. Something should
be done: How many ships did Thatcher send
to the FalkLands
--
0K i'LL check the Tail myself
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_naval_forces_in_the_Falklands_War
Royal Navy    {by my count 110 Total

    Active
    Alacrity
    Ambuscade
    Andromeda
    Antelope S
    Antrim
    Ardent S
    Argonaut
    Arrow
    Avenger
    Brilliant
    Bristol
    Broadsword
    Cardiff
    Conqueror
    Cordella
    Courageous
    Coventry S
    Dumbarton Castle
    Endurance
    Exeter
    Famella
    Fearless
    Glamorgan
    Glasgow
    Hecla
    Herald
    Hermes
    Hydra
    Intrepid
    Invincible
    Junella
    Leeds Castle
    Minerva
    Northella
    Onyx
    Penelope
    Pict
    Plymouth
    Sheffield S
    Spartan
    Splendid
    Valiant
    Yarmouth

Royal Fleet Auxiliary    

    Appleleaf
    Brambleleaf
    Bayleaf
    Blue Rover
    Engadine
    Fort Austin
    Fort Grange
    Plumleaf
    Pearleaf
    Olna
    Olmeda
    Regent
    Resource
    Sir Bedivere
    Sir Galahad S
    Sir Geraint
    Sir Lancelot
    Sir Percivale
    Sir Tristram
    Stromness
    Tidespring
    Tidepool

United Kingdom Ships Taken Up From Trade    

    Alvega
    Anco Charger
    Astronomer
    Atlantic Conveyor S
    Atlantic Causeway
    Avelona Star
    Balder London
    Baltic Ferry
    British Avon
    British Dart
    British Enterprise III
    British Esk
    British Tamar
    British Test
    British Trent
    British Wye
    Canberra
    Contender Bezant
    Eburna
    Elk
    Europic Ferry
    Fort Toronto
    G.A.Walker
    Geesport
    Iris
    Irishman
    Laertes
    Lycaon
    Nordic Ferry
    Norland
    Queen Elizabeth 2
    Rangatira
    Salvageman
    Saxonia
    Scottish Eagle
    St Edmund
    St Helena
    Stena Inspector
    Stena Seaspread
    Strathewe
    Tor Caledonia
    Uganda
    Wimpey Seahorse
    Yorkshireman

Royal Maritime Auxiliary Service    

    Goosander
    Typhoon

S - Sunk
=
My point is | is makes no sense to me to send 1.
the wind speed i heard was 360K/H So 360 Ships
from each of the 5 permanent members of Security
Council seams the proper number to deploy
?
& 1 gets sent????/ Who invented ThaT
5 * 360 = 1.8K
/TilT\
bac2rocketts to Phobos
Min 5 from each of the 5 = 25 Min
With Coordination | no more fly by Night BS
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Reginald Ret on November 15, 2013, 07:28:57 PM
Phobos is hollow? Now i want to live on/in it even more!
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: PopeSlag on November 15, 2013, 11:25:20 PM
Quote from: :regret: on November 15, 2013, 07:28:57 PM
Phobos is hollow? Now i want to live on/in it even more!

Do we have to fight the mole people for yet ANOTHER planet?
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 16, 2013, 11:04:59 AM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on November 14, 2013, 02:34:21 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 14, 2013, 01:54:47 AM
Quote from: Cardinal Pizza Deliverance. on November 14, 2013, 12:58:34 AM
I'd live there.

Actually, once we start thinking about building actual starships, Phobos and Deimos would be ideal places to build them. You could have raw materials and manufacturing on Mars, and have Phobos and Deimos act as the shipyards. In order to do that, all three would need to be inhabited. The upshot is that there's no life on Mars, so we can strip mine it and pollute the already mostly carbon dioxide atmosphere all we want.

I call dibs on Deimos!

20131116 03:04:59.am My clock may be fast OR?

anyway the first 5 group | communications / recon / observation
1&2 Geosync above portal & 90 degrees away
3 on the surface ? at the rim | of portal crater
4 Geo/Mars itself & #5 TBd ... robotics .. no human presence
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 17, 2013, 09:21:55 AM
ad 194 / 20131118

Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 05:33:17 AM
10 hours ago ... November 17, 2013: The United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket with NASA's Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN) spacecraft

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/11/18/nasa-set-to-launch-robotic-explorer-to-mars/

AS A's MAVEN spacecraft blasted off aboard an unmanned Atlas V rocket at 1:28 p.m. EST Monday afternoon | A for Alliance
(http://a57.foxnews.com/global.fncstatic.com/static/managed/img/Scitech/660/371/NASAexplorerlaunch3.jpg?ve=1)

Quote from: PopeSlag on November 15, 2013, 11:25:20 PM
Quote from: :regret: on November 15, 2013, 07:28:57 PM
Phobos is hollow? Now i want to live on/in it even more!

Do we have to fight the mole people for yet ANOTHER planet?

My guess is :"YES": Very soon to Already underway
Skipping ahead to the 2nd 5: com established
& it is Hole clean out time | prior to air lock insertion
these of course would be Robots . Multi Armed / trencher ATt
.5 1, &10T mods / explosives for really big 1's

The density of Phobos has now been directly measured by spacecraft to be 1.887 g/cm3  :fnord:  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_%28moon%29#Shklovsky.27s_.22Hollow_Phobos.22_hypothesis)
void space is mostly on small scales (millimeters to ~1-m) <NOt:
The porosity of Phobos was calculated to be 30% ± 5%, or a quarter to a third of the moon being hollow.
composition containing mainly phyllosilicates "chondrite " (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chondrite){NoPe

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylosilicate#Phyllosilicates {yep
basalt are mainly chlorite, kaolinite, epidote, tremolite  {Study on Feas
Chlorite - (Mg,Fe)3(Si,Al)4O10(OH)2•(Mg,Fe)3(OH)6 / Sg, 2.6–3.3
Kaolinite{2.16–2.68) - Al2Si2O5(OH)4 |  ?/?  | (Si4O11), tremolite{2.99 – 3.03)
Thus the RU.objection was 1 of THEM^ Not aN uFo
a specific gravity of 3.25 to 3.55 { My guess the ejected core was >3.
Volume: 5,729 km3. Mass: 10,658,529,896,187,200 kg.  :fnord:  (http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cfm?Object=Mar_Phobos)


Density Metric: 1.872 g/cm3 v 3. = 1/3 of mass missing {insides
the volume inside a sphere / ? / (http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/6/7/e678db0137d57dddf5d66f02a6fdf4ef.png)

Density Metric: 1.872 g/cm3 v 3. = 1/3 of mass missing {insides=5.3e15
the volume inside a sphere / ? / (http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/e/6/7/e678db0137d57dddf5d66f02a6fdf4ef.png)
? 5.73e3 * Me = 15.9e15 | Me=2.8e12 ?|? /3 = 1 | ...
Volume * Spacific gravity = Mass ?
V=M/Me2 aka Missing Volume = 5.3e15 / Me/3 {1) | ...
Mv= 5.3e15/((2.8e12)/3) = 5678.????/ | ...
TV= 5729 - 5678 Mv = 51 or a lot of space inside?
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:07:37 AM
ission costs $671 million. /  "We don't have that answer yet
_
My guess is about as follows, Phobos is a chunk out
of the side of Mars | Just as Earths Moon | there should be a scar
| Just as there is the Pacific Basin So Lemmee Look
.1 how big is the Moon | The moon is about one-fourth as big as Earth
a? 1/80th of Earth's mass and 1/ 50th of Earth's volume
  b~ volume contains 2.195 x 10^10 km3
2: Pacific Basin | volume of the Pacific Ocean
  a? estimated at some 714 million cubic kilometers.  thats an 8
   b~~ i do assume that due to continental drift, double 7
     c? hmm? My guess is Moon does contain its creator ? at the core
4: Mars's P Mean Radius: 11.1 km. Volume: 5,729 km3. Pretty tiny e=3
   a i can find my best guess using "crater" basic / from win 98 |tbd}
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 06:14:08 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:07:37 AM
ission costs $671 million. /  "We don't have that answer yet
_
My guess is about as follows, Phobos is a chunk out
of the side of Mars | Just as Earths Moon | there should be a scar
| Just as there is the Pacific Basin So Lemmee Look
.1 how big is the Moon | The moon is about one-fourth as big as Earth
a? 1/80th of Earth's mass and 1/ 50th of Earth's volume
  b~ volume contains 2.195 x 10^10 km3
2: Pacific Basin | volume of the Pacific Ocean
  a? estimated at some 714 million cubic kilometers.  thats an 8
   b~~ i do assume that due to continental drift, double 7
     c? hmm? My guess is Moon does contain its creator ? at the core
4: Mars's P Mean Radius: 11.1 km. Volume: 5,729 km3. Pretty tiny e=3
   a i can find my best guess using "crater" basic / from win 98 |tbd}

Both Phobos and Deimos are probably captured asteroids. We do know that Phobos will eventually collide with Mars. Likewise we know that Deimos will eventually drift from Martian orbit.

It is almost certain that Luna (to specify Earth's moon) was formed from an impact with proto-Earth and a Mars sized body, which eventually sank in and became the Earth's interior, at an oblique angle. Actually, Luna is probably unique in the solar system in that it is not either a captured satellite nor a body that coalesced in the same orbit, Luna is the direct offspring of its parent planet. Luna, incidentally, would eventually fling off from Earth orbit, but the Sun's death will put an end to that process well before it comes to be.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 06:19:19 AM
Hirley, you might be interested to know that I was going to pick your brain about the discrepancy between Venus' mass and Earth's mass and comparing the density of their atmospheres. Turns out that Earth's atmosphere was thinned by carbon dioxide sequestering because of liquid water. Nitrogen obviously came through other processes and the oxygen came about through photosynthesis, thus making atmospheric oxygen more or less a smoking gun in the search for extraterrestrial life, since, well, oxygen is a highly volatile gas.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:29:59 AM
ad 198 i think moon returns to Earth & < 1e9 (B}?

Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:14:08 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:07:37 AM
ission costs $671 million. /  "We don't have that answer yet
_
My guess is about as follows, Phobos is a chunk out
of the side of Mars | Just as Earths Moon | there should be a scar
| Just as there is the Pacific Basin So Lemmee Look
.1 how big is the Moon | The moon is about one-fourth as big as Earth
a? 1/80th of Earth's mass and 1/ 50th of Earth's volume
  b~ volume contains 2.195 x 10^10 km3
2: Pacific Basin | volume of the Pacific Ocean
  a? estimated at some 714 million cubic kilometers.  thats an 8
   b~~ i do assume that due to continental drift, double 7
     c? hmm? My guess is Moon does contain its creator ? at the core
4: Mars's P Mean Radius: 11.1 km. Volume: 5,729 km3. Pretty tiny e=3
   a i can find my best guess using "crater" basic / from win 98 |tbd}

Both Phobos and Deimos are probably captured asteroids. We do know that Phobos will eventually collide with Mars. Likewise we know that Deimos will eventually drift from Martian orbit.

It is almost certain that Luna (to specify Earth's moon) was formed from an impact with proto-Earth and a Mars sized body, which eventually sank in and became the Earth's interior, at an oblique angle. Actually, Luna is probably unique in the solar system in that it is not either a captured satellite nor a body that coalesced in the same orbit, Luna is the direct offspring of its parent planet. Luna, incidentally, would eventually fling off from Earth orbit, but the Sun's death will put an end to that process well before it comes to be.


ad 198 that said i came away from BASIC with a new idea
it was not an impactor {however its spelled | it was a volcanic eruption.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 06:32:01 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:29:59 AM
ad 198 i think moon returns to Earth & < 1e9 (B}?

Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:14:08 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:07:37 AM
ission costs $671 million. /  "We don't have that answer yet
_
My guess is about as follows, Phobos is a chunk out
of the side of Mars | Just as Earths Moon | there should be a scar
| Just as there is the Pacific Basin So Lemmee Look
.1 how big is the Moon | The moon is about one-fourth as big as Earth
a? 1/80th of Earth's mass and 1/ 50th of Earth's volume
  b~ volume contains 2.195 x 10^10 km3
2: Pacific Basin | volume of the Pacific Ocean
  a? estimated at some 714 million cubic kilometers.  thats an 8
   b~~ i do assume that due to continental drift, double 7
     c? hmm? My guess is Moon does contain its creator ? at the core
4: Mars's P Mean Radius: 11.1 km. Volume: 5,729 km3. Pretty tiny e=3
   a i can find my best guess using "crater" basic / from win 98 |tbd}

Both Phobos and Deimos are probably captured asteroids. We do know that Phobos will eventually collide with Mars. Likewise we know that Deimos will eventually drift from Martian orbit.

It is almost certain that Luna (to specify Earth's moon) was formed from an impact with proto-Earth and a Mars sized body, which eventually sank in and became the Earth's interior, at an oblique angle. Actually, Luna is probably unique in the solar system in that it is not either a captured satellite nor a body that coalesced in the same orbit, Luna is the direct offspring of its parent planet. Luna, incidentally, would eventually fling off from Earth orbit, but the Sun's death will put an end to that process well before it comes to be.


ad 198 that said i came away from BASIC with a new idea
it was not an impactor {however its spelled | it was a volcanic eruption.

I don't know what ad 198 means.

It is however proven that the Moon is moving away from the Earth an average on one inch per year. Data has been collected since the first human landing on this.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 06:33:05 AM
That would also be one hell of an eruption too.

I'd like to see what you have on that.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:40:18 AM
Warning - while you were typing 2 new replies ha

Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:19:19 AM
Hirley, you might be interested to know that I was going to pick your brain about the discrepancy between Venus' mass and Earth's mass and comparing the density of their atmospheres. Turns out that Earth's atmosphere was thinned by carbon dioxide sequestering because of liquid water. Nitrogen obviously came through other processes and the oxygen came about through photosynthesis, thus making atmospheric oxygen more or less a smoking gun in the search for extraterrestrial life, since, well, oxygen is a highly volatile gas.

ad 198 that is fine by me /-/owever Mine has been so badly
damaged in the fray that i do NOT trust it in any way whatsoever
it continues to com up with the rong dog. Anyway Looking }
oxygen  (yeah as in H2O water
carbon dioxide CO2 ? why is the number a suffix????/ & not A preMe
Nitrogen yeah? as in Laughing gas is my guess
it seams to methat U r leaving out Argon



Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:42:44 AM
Krackatoe


Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:33:05 AM
That would also be one hell of an eruption too.

I'd like to see what you have on that.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:44:02 AM
ars Moons  (Read 203 times {at the thread top

Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:32:01 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:29:59 AM
ad 198 i think moon returns to Earth & < 1e9 (B}?

Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:14:08 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:07:37 AM
ission costs $671 million. /  "We don't have that answer yet
_
My guess is about as follows, Phobos is a chunk out
of the side of Mars | Just as Earths Moon | there should be a scar
| Just as there is the Pacific Basin So Lemmee Look
.1 how big is the Moon | The moon is about one-fourth as big as Earth
a? 1/80th of Earth's mass and 1/ 50th of Earth's volume
  b~ volume contains 2.195 x 10^10 km3
2: Pacific Basin | volume of the Pacific Ocean
  a? estimated at some 714 million cubic kilometers.  thats an 8
   b~~ i do assume that due to continental drift, double 7
     c? hmm? My guess is Moon does contain its creator ? at the core
4: Mars's P Mean Radius: 11.1 km. Volume: 5,729 km3. Pretty tiny e=3
   a i can find my best guess using "crater" basic / from win 98 |tbd}

Both Phobos and Deimos are probably captured asteroids. We do know that Phobos will eventually collide with Mars. Likewise we know that Deimos will eventually drift from Martian orbit.

It is almost certain that Luna (to specify Earth's moon) was formed from an impact with proto-Earth and a Mars sized body, which eventually sank in and became the Earth's interior, at an oblique angle. Actually, Luna is probably unique in the solar system in that it is not either a captured satellite nor a body that coalesced in the same orbit, Luna is the direct offspring of its parent planet. Luna, incidentally, would eventually fling off from Earth orbit, but the Sun's death will put an end to that process well before it comes to be.


ad 198 that said i came away from BASIC with a new idea
it was not an impactor {however its spelled | it was a volcanic eruption.

I don't know what ad 198 means.

It is however proven that the Moon is moving away from the Earth an average on one inch per year. Data has been collected since the first human landing on this.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 06:44:13 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:40:18 AM
Warning - while you were typing 2 new replies ha

Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:19:19 AM
Hirley, you might be interested to know that I was going to pick your brain about the discrepancy between Venus' mass and Earth's mass and comparing the density of their atmospheres. Turns out that Earth's atmosphere was thinned by carbon dioxide sequestering because of liquid water. Nitrogen obviously came through other processes and the oxygen came about through photosynthesis, thus making atmospheric oxygen more or less a smoking gun in the search for extraterrestrial life, since, well, oxygen is a highly volatile gas.

ad 198 that is fine by me /-/owever Mine has been so badly
damaged in the fray that i do NOT trust it in any way whatsoever
it continues to com up with the rong dog. Anyway Looking }
oxygen  (yeah as in H2O water
carbon dioxide CO2 ? why is the number a suffix????/ & not A preMe
Nitrogen yeah? as in Laughing gas is my guess
it seams to methat U r leaving out Argon

You are right, but argon was virtually non existent in the original atmosphere, and is negligible in the current (though IIRC, third most abundant)
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 06:46:32 AM
That does bring up another interesting thing though. Nitrogen, while unbreathable in the sense that our lungs don't use it, is necessary to make air breathable, and it's not exactly an abundant gas elsewhere. What do you think about getting about 78% N2 gas locally when we get to the colonization business?
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 06:48:20 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:42:44 AM
Krackatoe


Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:33:05 AM
That would also be one hell of an eruption too.

I'd like to see what you have on that.

Krakatoa didn't produce a lunar mass object, though.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:50:53 AM
well space monkey what can a water monkey say ?

It is however proven that the Moon is moving away from the Earth an average on one inch per year. Data has been collected since the first human landing on this.

yes: i agree it currently is doing exactly that / more slowly each Ms
eventually, as Moon & Earth gain mass, it slows to " 0 "
& then it turns tail.

yping 2 new repli
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 06:54:04 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:50:53 AM
well space monkey what can a water monkey say ?

It is however proven that the Moon is moving away from the Earth an average on one inch per year. Data has been collected since the first human landing on this.

yes: i agree it currently is doing exactly that / more slowly each Ms
eventually, as Moon & Earth gain mass, it slows to " 0 "
& then it turns tail.

yping 2 new repli

How would either gain sufficient mass to reverse the process?

Hmm. I would have to think about how much mass either has gained through impacts over the past 4 some odd billion, and see where the trend is going.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:58:27 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:46:32 AM
That does bring up another interesting thing though. Nitrogen, while unbreathable in the sense that our lungs don't use it, is necessary to make air breathable, and it's not exactly an abundant gas elsewhere. What do you think about getting about 78% N2 gas locally when we get to the colonization business?

ad 211 hirley0, Doktor Blight and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
well i sort of doubt this.
i'LL guess there is a chance that the hollow in Phobos
has an atmosphere May need filtering? { a new r {{yeah yeah {{{U's win
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 07:01:40 AM
My Reference was reguarding Energy{not to sure about Mass

Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:48:20 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:42:44 AM
Krackatoe


Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:33:05 AM
That would also be one hell of an eruption too.

I'd like to see what you have on that.

Krakatoa didn't produce a lunar mass object, though.

i will check later{it takes a lot of time to switch XP->W98
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 07:05:01 AM
12:21 the next day ad 234 A <20Km sphere  :fnord: Think Tualatin valley  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tualatin_Valley)
A caldera 80 km (50 mi) wide is located at the summit of Olympus Mons
YES of course i will stick to Mons as "FROM WHENCE" it came
its reel easy 4Me to put the frames toGETher
.1 phobos is launched / with sufficient V to approach Orb
a. rising rather slowly / due to mass
2: a second more violent eruption = hi speed boster
  b. when Booster hits phobos | hard enough
   c: to cause phobos to loose its guts @->(_)=<
3? leaving a hollowed out P { Probably | gO Mons

Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:54:04 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:50:53 AM
well space monkey what can a water monkey say ?

It is however proven that the Moon is moving away from the Earth an average on one inch per year. Data has been collected since the first human landing on this.

yes: i agree it currently is doing exactly that / more slowly each Ms
eventually, as Moon & Earth gain mass, it slows to " 0 "
& then it turns tail.

yping 2 new repli

How would either gain sufficient mass to reverse the process?

Hmm. I would have to think about how much mass either has gained through impacts over the past 4 some odd billion, and see where the trend is going.

Muy guess was in 4.5 Earth about doubled in mass
as for the Moon | i have no guesses | yet | only that | More arives than Leaves
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 07:05:36 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:58:27 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:46:32 AM
That does bring up another interesting thing though. Nitrogen, while unbreathable in the sense that our lungs don't use it, is necessary to make air breathable, and it's not exactly an abundant gas elsewhere. What do you think about getting about 78% N2 gas locally when we get to the colonization business?

ad 211 hirley0, Doktor Blight and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
well i sort of doubt this.
i'LL guess there is a chance that the hollow in Phobos
has an atmosphere May need filtering? { a new r {{yeah yeah {{{U's win

That possibility did occur to me as far as the discrepancy in density goes. It would have to be a very light atmosphere though, no? Otherwise the mass would be noticeable?
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 07:07:28 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 07:05:01 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:54:04 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:50:53 AM
well space monkey what can a water monkey say ?

It is however proven that the Moon is moving away from the Earth an average on one inch per year. Data has been collected since the first human landing on this.

yes: i agree it currently is doing exactly that / more slowly each Ms
eventually, as Moon & Earth gain mass, it slows to " 0 "
& then it turns tail.

yping 2 new repli

How would either gain sufficient mass to reverse the process?

Hmm. I would have to think about how much mass either has gained through impacts over the past 4 some odd billion, and see where the trend is going.

Muy guess was in 4.5 Earth about doubled in mass
as for the Moon | i have no guesses | yet | only that | More arives than Leaves

This is true. I suspect it's an overestimation, but I have nothing to base that on other than knowing that Heavy Bombardment would have to have ended before life could thrive and evolve.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 07:08:55 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 07:05:36 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:58:27 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:46:32 AM
Nitrogen,
That possibility did occur to me

Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 07:07:28 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 07:05:01 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:54:04 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:50:53 AM
space ? water  ? yes: i agree
This is  I suspect
[/color]

while you were reading 2 here R cheat notes anyway
_ 100 MEGATONNE STANDARD 1KM CRATER _                       
                                                           
for an impactor of                                         
DIAMETER =   100   meters         DENSITY =   2600 Kg/m^3   
VELOCITY =   25     Km/s          entry ANGLE =  60  degrees
WITH KE =  4.254236E+17   JOULE                           
                                                           
INPACTOR                             CREATOR DIAMETER       
   VOLUME  %523598.3      M^3      ACTUAL       1090 M     
   MASS    % 13.6E+08   Kg         APPEARENT    1362 M     
                                         DEPTH             
( 0) ERG    4.254236E+24           ACTUAL          272 M   
( 6) JOULE  4.254236E+17           APPEARENT      218 M     
(12) KWHR   1.181732E+11                                   
(18)  KT    101291                                         
(24)  Rh    4.254236       (24)Cr  1         (24)Ri  3     
(30)  Tp    0                                               
(36)  Sf    0                            EJECTRA           
(42)  Ob    0                      REMOVED    % 1.3E+08 M^3
tbc in < 10
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 06:42:44 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:33:05 AM
That would also be one hell of an eruption too.

I'd like to see what you have on that.
Krackatoe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympus_Mons

actually i do not have cheat for K >
WITH KE =  1.104465E+19   JOULE                           
                                                           
INPACTOR                             CREATOR DIAMETER     
   VOLUME  % 1.4E+07      M^3      ACTUAL       2895 M     
3.21299E+07 T   MASS    % 35.3E+09   Kg                   
                                   APPEARENT    3619 M     
                                         DEPTH             
( 0) ERG    1.104465E+26           ACTUAL          724 M   
( 6) JOULE  1.104465E+19           APPEARENT      579 M   
(12) KWHR   3.067959E+12                                   
(18)  KT    2629679                                       
(24)  Rh    110.4465       (24)Cr  2         (24)Ri  8     
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 07:10:55 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 07:08:55 AM
while you were reading 2 here R cheat notes anyway
_ 100 MEGATONNE STANDARD 1KM CRATER _                       
                                                           
for an impactor of                                         
DIAMETER =   100   meters         DENSITY =   2600 Kg/m^3   
VELOCITY =   25     Km/s          entry ANGLE =  60  degrees
WITH KE =  4.254236E+17   JOULE                           
                                                           
INPACTOR                             CREATOR DIAMETER       
   VOLUME  %523598.3      M^3      ACTUAL       1090 M     
   MASS    % 13.6E+08   Kg         APPEARENT    1362 M     
                                         DEPTH             
( 0) ERG    4.254236E+24           ACTUAL          272 M   
( 6) JOULE  4.254236E+17           APPEARENT      218 M     
(12) KWHR   1.181732E+11                                   
(18)  KT    101291                                         
(24)  Rh    4.254236       (24)Cr  1         (24)Ri  3     
(30)  Tp    0                                               
(36)  Sf    0                            EJECTRA           
(42)  Ob    0                      REMOVED    % 1.3E+08 M^3
tbc in < 10

This is the sort of thing that makes my eyes cross, and part of where I don't understand you. What am I looking at here? (Thank you, btw, whatever it is)
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 07:12:09 AM
(I'm guessing it's a model of some sort of meteor hitting and the aftermath)
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 07:26:35 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 07:12:09 AM
(I'm guessing it's a model of some sort of meteor hitting and the aftermath)

yeah eXactly REMOVED    % 1.3E+08 M^3
here is the clue / from 1KM crater / v Phobos # tbd}
Mass:  10,658,529,896,187,200 kg {{ rong A tbc}
11:33&1/3pm Volume:  5,729 km3 aka 5.7 e12 m^3
convert from km3 to m3 tbc TBD :LoC/lOc
Converterin. 1 km3 to m3 = 1000000000. km3 E9+3
k# PRIOR2new day? tbd} K_j e20 K_ejct e10 m3 ? 1Km?
i remind U however its about Olympus Mons not about K 11:51pm pSt
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 19, 2013, 07:31:08 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 07:26:35 AM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 07:12:09 AM
(I'm guessing it's a model of some sort of meteor hitting and the aftermath)

yeah eXactly REMOVED    % 1.3E+08 M^3
here is the clue / from 1KM crater / v Phobos # tbd}

So this is data to back up the hypothesis that Phobos was formed from the debris from an impactor on Mars.
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 05:41:30 PM
246 FROM: A caldera 80 km wide {THIS 8 refutes ^~" from an impactor o "~
This is a WHITE Line   _______________________
Impactor may refer to: A large meteoroid, asteroid, comet, or other celestial object
My Question is why Impactor / impactor / impactor are shown as Miss spelled!-!
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Nephew Twiddleton on November 20, 2013, 01:01:20 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 05:41:30 PM
246 FROM: A caldera 80 km wide {THIS 8 refutes ^~" from an impactor o "~
This is a WHITE Line   _______________________
Impactor may refer to: A large meteoroid, asteroid, comet, or other celestial object
My Question is why Impactor / impactor / impactor are shown as Miss spelled!-!


That is in fact a white line.

What does it mean?
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 20, 2013, 06:59:40 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 20, 2013, 01:01:20 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 05:41:30 PM
246 FROM: A caldera 80 km wide {THIS 8 refutes ^~" from an impactor o "~
This is a WHITE Line   _______________________
Impactor may refer to: A large meteoroid, asteroid, comet, or other celestial object
My Question is why Impactor / impactor / impactor are shown as Miss spelled!-!


That is in fact a white line.

What does it mean?

i best go low on this page????/
10:56-59
(http://s01.flagcounter.com/count/2Y/bg_FFFFFF/txt_000000/border_CCCCCC/columns_3/maxflags_21/viewers_3/labels_0/pageviews_0/flags_0/) white/blue/red ЯUssian flag
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 20, 2013, 07:01:28 PM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 20, 2013, 06:59:40 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 20, 2013, 01:01:20 AM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 19, 2013, 05:41:30 PM
246 FROM: A caldera 80 km wide {THIS 8 refutes ^~" from an impactor o "~
This is a WHITE Line   _______________________
Impactor may refer to: A large meteoroid, asteroid, comet, or other celestial object
My Question is why Impactor / impactor / impactor are shown as Miss spelled!-!


That is in fact a white line.

What does it mean?

i best go low on this page????/
10:56-59
(http://s01.flagcounter.com/count/2Y/bg_FFFFFF/txt_000000/border_CCCCCC/columns_3/maxflags_21/viewers_3/labels_0/pageviews_0/flags_0/) white/blue/red ЯUssian flag

i got it Right the 1st time {AMaZing SA176 US87 UK33 CN10 ЯU6
My Guess is the Saudies have the site assigned as a?
college credit class in web hacking {however i donno {{ Just guessing
they arive Late on Site and Quickly became front runner
My second guess is they use the possition in lue of a seat on the UN
security council {which SA {{ rejected {{{ when Nominated
thus giving them SOMe Green status in the W/B/Я NEGOSHEATIONS ?¿
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 20, 2013, 07:30:34 PM
11:30 &
Such trivia as LoC {Loss of Carrier
& the Brits R hot on the Trail
tbd 10:33&1/3
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 20, 2013, 07:40:02 PM
1:39 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JAXA
1:37 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNSA
1:36 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Space_Research_Organisation
1:33 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Space_Agency
1:3? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA
1:30 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_space_program
1:23  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Mars_Science_Laboratory
1:06 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAVEN
US$69 million http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Orbiter_Mission  Mangalyaan
1:03&4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curiosity_rover
1:01pm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunity_%28rover%29
:fnord: 89th Comment  (http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-spacecraft-poised-launch-clues-martian-air-062337800.html)
ad 347 Me again 4the 12-2 pm math 2Hr | find :fnord:  (http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/maven/main/) :fnord:  (http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-spacecraft-poised-launch-clues-martian-air-062337800.html) :fnord:  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAVEN)
ad 345 Some1 else / Music hour 9-10 got2Go tbc L8R
this is a red line      ______. {4:10 | 5:20 } ad 318= Just Me.
4:06 ? opb\pbs\Ash*
ad 317 DW.de covered StOry at the 3:17 broadcast****
Followed by US NAturally {{{ad 300 {{ 11:42:32

Quote from: hirley0 on November 20, 2013, 07:30:34 PM
11:30 &
Such trivia as LoC {Loss of Carrier
& the Brits R hot on the Trail
tbd 10:33&1/3
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 21, 2013, 09:49:30 PM
 launch window ? 20 days long and started on 28 October 2013.
Mangalyaan 5 November 2013 - transfer orbit on 1 December 2013 /24 September 2014
MAVEN November 18, 2013. /September 22, 2014
Something does not add up HERE to Me ????/

ad 363  3:45pm
exactly what brings about a " launch window " escapes my eye at this time
My next Quest is the moon as a gravity assist mechanism?
it seams reasonable to me that some series of orbits
that cause a close approach to the moon
should assist in saving fuel in a TRIP UP

6PM  JPL  :fnord:  (http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,32982.msg1309145.html#msg1309145)
6:11 The number i got was 17 months 12+5 n-n=12+5=April ????/
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: Reginald Ret on November 22, 2013, 12:33:11 PM
Quote from: hirley0 on November 21, 2013, 09:49:30 PM
launch window ? 20 days long and started on 28 October 2013.
Mangalyaan 5 November 2013 - transfer orbit on 1 December 2013 /24 September 2014
MAVEN November 18, 2013. /September 22, 2014
Something does not add up HERE to Me ????/

ad 363  3:45pm
exactly what brings about a " launch window " escapes my eye at this time
My next Quest is the moon as a gravity assist mechanism?
it seams reasonable to me that some series of orbits
that cause a close approach to the moon
should assist in saving fuel in a TRIP UP

6PM  JPL  :fnord:  (http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,32982.msg1309145.html#msg1309145)
6:11 The number i got was 17 months 12+5 n-n=12+5=April ????/
Hmm, I don't think you would save any fuel. Within the influence of the earth the effect of the moon is neglible, after all, you don't feel lighter when the moon is overhead. Only at the area where the moon's gravity and the earth's gravity are close to equal would this help. But even then if you would want to go anywhere outside of the imaginary line between the center of the moon and the center of the earth you would now have to escape both gravities.
It is good for a trip to the moon or a trip to the Lagrangian point L1, but other than that is likely to be a hindrance.
Maybe the moon can be used for a gravity assist (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slingshot_maneuver)?
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 22, 2013, 08:12:58 PM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slingshot_maneuver

I have no idea
there r things i consider myself as cleaver AT
SlingShots are not one | i made several in youth
none were effective that i recall / BB gun / Yes / slingshot / not4me
Mars Moon & Maven? |Just a min |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAVEN
i don't think i want to grab the wiki train on this trip
the WACKkee one sounds more along my line
No idea WHERE to grab 'ER 12:18 | I BEST SHOWER
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 23, 2013, 09:27:40 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missions_to_Mars#Missions_to_the_moons_of_Mars
what i am after is MAVEN's orbital position day by day{ad 400
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/maven/launch/maven_briefs_events.html
the 14th will be ten days ago TOMORROW {Gimme A Q
http://lasp.colorado.edu/home/maven/2013/11/09/maven-briefings-and-events/
coverage | NOT verbiage
http://www.spaceflight101.com/maven-mission-profile.html
0K 4get it. {1:29:45 am ||| 11:42:51 am}
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missions_to_Mars

En route
MOM    5 November 2013 Mangalyaan 11/5  :fnord:  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Orbiter_Mission) :fnord:  (http://www.isro.org/mars/home.aspx) :fnord:  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mangalyaan)
MAVEN    18 November 2013

Operational
Mars Odyssey    7 April 2001
Mars Express    2 June 2003
Opportunity(MER-B)    8 July 2003  :fnord:  (http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php/topic,32982.msg1309624.html#msg1309624)
MRO                  12 August 2005
Curiosity           26 November 2011


MAVEN          11/18
ORS 3        \
STPSat 3    \
28 CubeSats\  11/20
Yaogan 19       11/20
CubeSats 32    11/21
Swarm ESA       11/22
Shiyan 5              11/25
SES-8                   11/25
Progress M-21M  25
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: hirley0 on November 24, 2013, 11:36:29 AM
ad 428  v READ DOWN WEEK v
Listen? i have no idea where this is going
i see in ad 1 on this ? PAGE  the string inst.
and my guess is that it is a 4 string
when? i do do math {conver to .vi) i do do 4 count 1 2 3 4
maybe as in 4/4 time{probably
if i find the ans | will repeat it  {4 3 times | tbc

11:55}4 12:15 3.1
Quote from: LuciferX on November 24, 2013, 06:51:57 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:46:32 AM
That does bring up another interesting thing though. Nitrogen, while unbreathable in the sense that our lungs don't use it, is necessary to make air breathable, and it's not exactly an abundant gas elsewhere. What do you think about getting about 78% N2 gas locally when we get to the colonization business?
Let's get the runoff from first greenhouses to create hypertrophic reservoirs that we feed to oxygen starved heterotrophic bacteria, enslaved and forced to produce nitrogen, and, and, we will be their gods once more! Hahahaha :wink:
Quote from: LuciferX on November 24, 2013, 06:51:57 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:46:32 AM
That does bring up another interesting thing though. Nitrogen, while unbreathable in the sense that our lungs don't use it, is necessary to make air breathable, and it's not exactly an abundant gas elsewhere. What do you think about getting about 78% N2 gas locally when we get to the colonization business?
Let's get the runoff from first greenhouses to create hypertrophic reservoirs that we feed to oxygen starved heterotrophic bacteria, enslaved and forced to produce nitrogen, and, and, we will be their gods once more! Hahahaha :wink:
Quote from: LuciferX on November 24, 2013, 06:51:57 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:46:32 AM
That does bring up another interesting thing though. Nitrogen, while unbreathable in the sense that our lungs don't use it, is necessary to make air breathable, and it's not exactly an abundant gas elsewhere. What do you think about getting about 78% N2 gas locally when we get to the colonization business?
Let's get the runoff from first greenhouses to create hypertrophic reservoirs that we feed to oxygen starved heterotrophic bacteria, enslaved and forced to produce nitrogen, and, and, we will be their gods once more! Hahahaha :wink:
Quote from: LuciferX on November 24, 2013, 06:51:57 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight link=topic=35789.msg1312763#msg1312763  tbD
/quote]

http://www.webelements.com/nitrogen/history.html
http://chemistry.about.com/od/elementfacts/a/nitrogen.htm
https://www.sunysccc.edu/academic/mst/ptable/n.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen
Title: Re: Mars Moons
Post by: minuspace on November 24, 2013, 06:51:57 PM
Quote from: Doktor Blight on November 19, 2013, 06:46:32 AM
That does bring up another interesting thing though. Nitrogen, while unbreathable in the sense that our lungs don't use it, is necessary to make air breathable, and it's not exactly an abundant gas elsewhere. What do you think about getting about 78% N2 gas locally when we get to the colonization business?
Let's get the runoff from first greenhouses to create hypertrophic reservoirs that we feed to oxygen starved heterotrophic bacteria, enslaved and forced to produce nitrogen, and, and, we will be their gods once more! Hahahaha :wink: