I'm curious about something.
I never really grew up a Christian. My grandfather used to take us to an Episcopal church when I was little, but I never paid attention, and we stopped going when I was 8. Plus, my dad was a physicist, and my mom just didn't care, so it just wasn't discussed much.
I only got into comparative religion during High School, so my Bible knowledge is much more 3rd person removed than being in it, and I never really heard any of the abstract reasoning regarding some questions about the Bible. Not to mention, I doubt an Episcopal church would have bothered with some of the thornier things mentioned.
So anyway, I know a few of you are ex-"hardcore" Christian literalists; y'all would have some insight into the ways of church reasoning. The reason I bring all this up is because of a few points in The God Delusion I read last night, and I'd like to hear how a devoted person would respond.
NOTE: This is not necessarily a Xtian-bashing thread, or at least it is not intended to be. I am honestly interested in the ways SRS Xtians handle these issues.
Essentially, it's about the birth of Jesus in Matthew and Luke, and how the two just don't line up with each other regarding the circumstances of how they got to Bethlehem, and how the lineages documented in each gospel differ widely.
I know, these are trivial points, and not crucial to Christ's "let's be nice to each other" message, but I was just interested how a literalist would handle something like that.
Again, this is pure curiosity, and not yet another LOL XTIAN thread.
I never really grew up a Christian. My grandfather used to take us to an Episcopal church when I was little, but I never paid attention, and we stopped going when I was 8. Plus, my dad was a physicist, and my mom just didn't care, so it just wasn't discussed much.
I only got into comparative religion during High School, so my Bible knowledge is much more 3rd person removed than being in it, and I never really heard any of the abstract reasoning regarding some questions about the Bible. Not to mention, I doubt an Episcopal church would have bothered with some of the thornier things mentioned.
So anyway, I know a few of you are ex-"hardcore" Christian literalists; y'all would have some insight into the ways of church reasoning. The reason I bring all this up is because of a few points in The God Delusion I read last night, and I'd like to hear how a devoted person would respond.
NOTE: This is not necessarily a Xtian-bashing thread, or at least it is not intended to be. I am honestly interested in the ways SRS Xtians handle these issues.
Essentially, it's about the birth of Jesus in Matthew and Luke, and how the two just don't line up with each other regarding the circumstances of how they got to Bethlehem, and how the lineages documented in each gospel differ widely.
I know, these are trivial points, and not crucial to Christ's "let's be nice to each other" message, but I was just interested how a literalist would handle something like that.
Again, this is pure curiosity, and not yet another LOL XTIAN thread.