could anarchy work, under any conditions?

[DJRubberducky]

I suspect those people simply have no sense of personal responsiblity.  They want to be able to do whatever the hell they want whenever the hell they want to, and to hell with anyone else who might be offended (but heaven help anyone else who attempts to live in the same manner and consequently offends *them*).

I also suspect that the idea of anarchy appeals to them because they think it means they won't have to answer to anybody - there isn't anyone in a position of power to discipline or punish them for their actions, so they can do anything they want.  If they were to see anarchy as requiring self-discipline and genuine consideration for others, there's no way they'd embrace the idea.

[Chef]

Hey!  Educate the Noob.  What the fuck is "talufa"?

After I know what you're talking about, I can better respond.

MY FATASS COUSIN.  HE IS A MENACE TO SOCIETY, AND A PLAGUE ON ALL WHO COME NEAR HIM.

ESPECIALLY ME.

CHEF D,
HASN'T SEEN TALUFA OR THE VAN FOR A WEEK.

[LMNO]

Bob Dylan: "to live outside the law, you must be honest."

[Chef]

I suspect those people simply have no sense of personal responsiblity.  

IF "THOSE PEOPLE" = THE HUMAN RACE, THIS IS THE CORRECT MOB OF PRIMATES.

[LMNO]

I always thought it was unreasonable to lump a group of people into a single category.

[Chef]

I always thought it was unreasonable to lump a group of people into a single category.

I DIDN'T.  I LUMPED *ALL* HUMANS INTO 1 CATAGORY.

OWNED, SON.

[LMNO]

"All" is considerd a group.

And can we get Roger back, please?

[DJRubberducky]

I always thought it was unreasonable to lump a group of people into a single category.

I, for one, have made a very deliberate point of never referring to myself as reasonable or rational.  I know myself better than that.

[gnimbley]

I suspect those people simply have no sense of personal responsiblity.  They want to be able to do whatever the hell they want whenever the hell they want to, and to hell with anyone else who might be offended (but heaven help anyone else who attempts to live in the same manner and consequently offends *them*).

I also suspect that the idea of anarchy appeals to them because they think it means they won't have to answer to anybody - there isn't anyone in a position of power to discipline or punish them for their actions, so they can do anything they want.  If they were to see anarchy as requiring self-discipline and genuine consideration for others, there's no way they'd embrace the idea.

Yeah. I can think of some people around here who think the same way.

[LMNO]

Looks like the gnome is puttin on his fightin' pants!

[Horab Fibslager]

the gnome has pants? i thought he only wore shoes...

[LMNO]

well, he can't wear his fightin' pants all the time, now can he?  Otherwise, he'd be a fightin' gnome, and then who'd want to give him cookies?

[Horab Fibslager]

cthulu?

[LMNO]

Hey, when did cthulu start giving away cookies?

I want a cthulu cookie, dammit!

[Horab Fibslager]

id unno if cthulu gives cookies or not, but at the same time it seemed the only possible explanation.

proof 1: cthulu prefer teh taste of people wearign pants

proof 2: gnimbley not wearing pants inciting cthulu to want him to wear pants

proof 3: gnimbley has no morals int eh pursuit of cookies and would trade the freedom to go pantless for a cookie or two before you can say go here he comes, here coems speed racer, he's a demon on wheels.

there fore, cthulu would give gnimbley a cookie to wear his fightin pants all the time.