How We Protect At-Risk Kids.

[AFK]

MPHs are good program coordinators. 

Without training?  How interesting.

Program Coordination is kind of like the assembly floor of this field.  You need the big guns to do the higher level planning.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Yeah, looks like bullshit to me: http://www.oregonmph.org/

[Nephew Twiddleton]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

JESUS FUCK, IT'S RIGHT ON THE NIH WEBPAGE ABOUT TAKE-BACK PROGRAMS

OMG OMG OMG

REALLY?

I smell ownage in the air, here.

Can you link to this, so we can all enjoy RWHN's ignorance, right after he claimed an MPH isn't trained?

Let's recap:

The Daily Mail is a reputable source.
MPHs have no training.
The NIH doesn't know what it's talking about.

Also cancer patients want access to carcinogens for therapeutic reasons.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Yeah, looks like bullshit to me: http://www.oregonmph.org/

Yeah, I knew he was talking out of his ass.

It's funny to watch him dig himself a hole, though.

MPH'S HAVE NO TRAINING.   

[The Good Reverend Roger]

MPHs are good program coordinators. 

Without training?  How interesting.

Program Coordination is kind of like the assembly floor of this field.  You need the big guns to do the higher level planning.

MPPs are parasites.  You've bragged about it.

[Anna Mae Bollocks]

If RWHN actually smoked pot he wouldn't be such a unbearable piece of shit, and his wife would have stayed with him.

My ex-wife would be a serious down-grade.

From your imaginary GF?

Guess I have a very vivid and sensory-inducing imagination.

I guess so.

I think that henceforth, I'll be referring to her as "Casperina".

[AFK]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

JESUS FUCK, IT'S RIGHT ON THE NIH WEBPAGE ABOUT TAKE-BACK PROGRAMS

OMG OMG OMG

REALLY?

I smell ownage in the air, here.

Can you link to this, so we can all enjoy RWHN's ignorance, right after he claimed an MPH isn't trained?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866706/

Uh, you DO realize this article is talking about the efficacy as pertains to the impact on the environment right? 

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Watching an MPP calling an MPH untrained is like watching Donald Rumsfeld tell generals how to run a war.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

JESUS FUCK, IT'S RIGHT ON THE NIH WEBPAGE ABOUT TAKE-BACK PROGRAMS

OMG OMG OMG

REALLY?

I smell ownage in the air, here.

Can you link to this, so we can all enjoy RWHN's ignorance, right after he claimed an MPH isn't trained?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866706/

Uh, you DO realize this article is talking about the efficacy as pertains to the impact on the environment right?

You DO realize the program calls for the dangerous (healthwise) drugs to go down the sink, right?

I mean, you HAVE read Maine's plan, haven't you?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

MPHs are good program coordinators. 

Without training?  How interesting.

Program Coordination is kind of like the assembly floor of this field.  You need the big guns to do the higher level planning.

MPPs are parasites.  You've bragged about it.

I guess I'm wondering exactly how he reconciles this:

http://oregonmph.org/content/health-management-policy-psu

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

JESUS FUCK, IT'S RIGHT ON THE NIH WEBPAGE ABOUT TAKE-BACK PROGRAMS

OMG OMG OMG

REALLY?

I smell ownage in the air, here.

Can you link to this, so we can all enjoy RWHN's ignorance, right after he claimed an MPH isn't trained?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866706/

Uh, you DO realize this article is talking about the efficacy as pertains to the impact on the environment right?

You DO realize the program calls for the dangerous (healthwise) drugs to go down the sink, right?

I mean, you HAVE read Maine's plan, haven't you?

Did you even read it? The article primarily addresses environmental issues but also makes mention of the "claims" that it also reduces drug abuse.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

MPHs are good program coordinators. 

Without training?  How interesting.

Program Coordination is kind of like the assembly floor of this field.  You need the big guns to do the higher level planning.

MPPs are parasites.  You've bragged about it.

I guess I'm wondering exactly how he reconciles this:

http://oregonmph.org/content/health-management-policy-psu

Well contrast this with:

Spending your tax money eating dinner and drinking beer in Austin, lol.

Clearly, MPPs are necessary for this sort of thing.

[AFK]

Watching an MPP calling an MPH untrained is like watching Donald Rumsfeld tell generals how to run a war.

You're funny.  Of course they get training.  The grad school I went to just started an MPH program.  There are MPHs in my office.  I'm only questioning the voracity of Nigel's friends training.  Given the ideas she seems to have that are antithetical to evidence-based public health theories.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

JESUS FUCK, IT'S RIGHT ON THE NIH WEBPAGE ABOUT TAKE-BACK PROGRAMS

OMG OMG OMG

REALLY?

I smell ownage in the air, here.

Can you link to this, so we can all enjoy RWHN's ignorance, right after he claimed an MPH isn't trained?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866706/

Uh, you DO realize this article is talking about the efficacy as pertains to the impact on the environment right?

You DO realize the program calls for the dangerous (healthwise) drugs to go down the sink, right?

I mean, you HAVE read Maine's plan, haven't you?

Did you even read it? The article primarily addresses environmental issues but also makes mention of the "claims" that it also reduces drug abuse.

Yes.

Down near the bottom under "save a flush", it says:

Only certain drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration should be flushed down the toilet or drain. These include drugs deemed to be "especially harmful to a child, pet, or anyone else if taken accidentally," according to the agency's "Information for Consumers (Drugs)" webpage.

I find it vastly amusing that RWHN didn't know that.

[AFK]

NOTHING about what he preaches is based in harm reduction. NOTHING. Even the take-back programs are of dubious utility.

WOW, did your MPH friend tell you that?

Oh, you mean the person with actual TRAINING?

JESUS FUCK, IT'S RIGHT ON THE NIH WEBPAGE ABOUT TAKE-BACK PROGRAMS

OMG OMG OMG

REALLY?

I smell ownage in the air, here.

Can you link to this, so we can all enjoy RWHN's ignorance, right after he claimed an MPH isn't trained?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2866706/

Uh, you DO realize this article is talking about the efficacy as pertains to the impact on the environment right?

You DO realize the program calls for the dangerous (healthwise) drugs to go down the sink, right?

I mean, you HAVE read Maine's plan, haven't you?

Did you even read it? The article primarily addresses environmental issues but also makes mention of the "claims" that it also reduces drug abuse.

I did read it. "makes mention" isn't exactly rigorous study.