News:

PD.com: promoting the nomadic, war-like and democratic lupine culture since 2002

Main Menu

Scientific Proof of Republicult™ Deceitfulness

Started by Abbot Mythos, June 18, 2025, 11:07:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Abbot Mythos

To the surprise of absolutely no one, what we've always known to be true has been scientifically proven, according to the following study:

Study finds Republicans flagged for posting misleading tweets twice as often as Democrats on Community Notes

As per this study:

""Our findings provide strong evidence of a partisan asymmetry in misinformation sharing which cannot be attributed to political bias on the part of fact-checkers or academic researchers," said Professor Mohsen Mosleh, associate professor of social data science at the Oxford Internet Institute, part of the University of Oxford.

"Even on Elon Musk's X, the user-based Community Notes program flags posts by Republicans as misleading much more often than posts by Democrats. This undercuts the logic offered by Musk and Mark Zuckerberg for eliminating fact-checkers on X and Meta, respectively, namely that fact-checkers are biased against Republicans.""

Now, I want to find a scientific study about the average Republican Intelligence Quotient. I suspect the conclusions of such a study will be equally unsurprising.

Omnidextrious

I was recently in a long format debate with 'Turning Point USA' staff on the topic of transgenderism to see where they were at these days.

It seems like their hill to die on is "protect female spaces" on the premise that Men can never be Women genetically, and to contradict the natural order would traumatize young Women and inherently be harmful. They present the narrative that they are based and cemented in concrete facts of "science" and irrefutable three rules of logic.

Their entire political platform is based on the irrefutability of their "science". Even though they want to ignore sociology, psychology, masses of firsthand testimony, and endless literature on the topic. They completely disregard the promising potential of gene alteration with is about to make major breakthroughs, and fundamentally misunderstand the scientific process.

Literally, they want to be the party supported by Bible thumpers, and they want to appear to be aligned with the scientific "authorities". Sadly, they can't have both.

I think the religion and greed motivates their deceits, it formed their bias very early in life, and the conservative men seem to separate their thoughts into different boxes that they do not dare cross contaminate.

All this to say that my personal experience seems to match your study's claims.
Notice that you spend very little time engaging people who already agree with you, but you'll spend countless hours trying to correct nit wits. Why?