News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Question about BIP

Started by Sir Perineal, March 04, 2007, 08:58:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

hunter s.durden

Quote from: LHX on March 06, 2007, 04:21:08 PM
i am not congratulating anybody in this thread

Or at all. If everyone is tired of the congradulatory blowjobs on here, our new motto will be "If you don't have something mean to say, then don't say anything!"
This space for rent.

Cain

That was our motto, back in 2005

hunter s.durden

HSD- only behind 2 years now!
This space for rent.

Cramulus


P3nT4gR4m

That statue is a fucking abortion.

Just saying

I'm up to my arse in Brexit Numpties, but I want more.  Target-rich environments are the new sexy.
Not actually a meat product.
Ass-Kicking & Foot-Stomping Ancient Master of SHIT FUCK FUCK FUCK
Awful and Bent Behemothic Results of Last Night's Painful Squat.
High Altitude Haggis-Filled Sex Bucket From Beyond Time and Space.
Internet Monkey Person of Filthy and Immoral Pygmy-Porn Wart Contagion
Octomom Auxillary Heat Exchanger Repairman
walking the fine line line between genius and batshit fucking crazy

"computation is a pattern in the spacetime arrangement of particles, and it's not the particles but the pattern that really matters! Matter doesn't matter." -- Max Tegmark

Sir Perineal

Quote from: LMNO on March 06, 2007, 03:24:42 PM
you can make predictions of human behavior based on probabilities and typical primate behavior, but you can't predict precise individual action/thought/behavior.

But the inability to predict something doesn't necessarily preclude that thing from being predictable, does it?
Sir Perineal Gräfenberg III, KSC, AOHF, AISB, FNORD, HIMEOBS

~Concordian Commissar of the Academic Order of THE HEMLOCK FELLOWSHIP~

LHX

Quote from: Sir Perineal on March 07, 2007, 12:37:14 AM
Quote from: LMNO on March 06, 2007, 03:24:42 PM
you can make predictions of human behavior based on probabilities and typical primate behavior, but you can't predict precise individual action/thought/behavior.

But the inability to predict something doesn't necessarily preclude that thing from being predictable, does it?
storms

Heisenburg's uncertainty principle

the more accurately you know the position of something, the less accurately you know the speed at which it moves

the more accurately you know the speed of something, the less accurately you know its position


there is a rogue factor when self seeks to define self

a part of the feedback loop that is not predictable


but - on the other hand -
all you have to do is get meta with it and say that something is predictably unpredictable

its not clear cut
neat hell

Sir Perineal

Quote from: LHX on March 07, 2007, 02:00:02 AM
but - on the other hand -
all you have to do is get meta with it and say that something is predictably unpredictable

Chaos Theory, oh noes!!!1
Sir Perineal Gräfenberg III, KSC, AOHF, AISB, FNORD, HIMEOBS

~Concordian Commissar of the Academic Order of THE HEMLOCK FELLOWSHIP~

LMNO

Quote from: Sir Perineal on March 07, 2007, 12:37:14 AM
Quote from: LMNO on March 06, 2007, 03:24:42 PM
you can make predictions of human behavior based on probabilities and typical primate behavior, but you can't predict precise individual action/thought/behavior.

But the inability to predict something doesn't necessarily preclude that thing from being predictable, does it?

Predicting the probability of an action is very different than predicting the possibility of an action.

Or, to be more precise, predicting the probability of the possibility of an action is very different than predicting the possibility of an action.


You can say, "in a group of 100 people given stimuli X, about 90 will react with Y"

Or you can say, "if Joe is given stimuli X, there is a 90% chance he will react with Y"

But you can't say, ""if Joe is given stimuli X, he will react with Y 100% of the time."