News:

Testimonial: "None of you seem aware of quite how bad you are. I mean I'm pretty outspoken on how bad the internet has gotten, but this is up there with the worst."

Main Menu

No freedom to protest for YUO!

Started by Cain, January 12, 2010, 03:13:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Elder Iptuous

Quote from: Cain on January 13, 2010, 06:02:34 PM
Oh.  Well, twenty or thirty years, maybe.  These things need time to properly boil up.

On the other hand, 4GW and 5GW groups might do in the entire state system first.  Everyone assumes a systemic war will be an intra-state affair, but the way things are going, transnational groups might be the ones to start changing the system.  From that point of view, the war started eight years ago, and this is just a switch to the second phase.

i don't know about that.
if the nation-state as a model starts failing, they will do what is in their power to maintain themselves, and that means using force.  if they start failing en masse, they will start using force en masse...

that can happen sooner rather than later.
i don't know that we need any more wind-up than we already have...

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Iptuous on January 13, 2010, 06:13:01 PM
Quote from: Cain on January 13, 2010, 06:02:34 PM
Oh.  Well, twenty or thirty years, maybe.  These things need time to properly boil up.

On the other hand, 4GW and 5GW groups might do in the entire state system first.  Everyone assumes a systemic war will be an intra-state affair, but the way things are going, transnational groups might be the ones to start changing the system.  From that point of view, the war started eight years ago, and this is just a switch to the second phase.

i don't know about that.
if the nation-state as a model starts failing, they will do what is in their power to maintain themselves, and that means using force.  if they start failing en masse, they will start using force en masse...

that can happen sooner rather than later.
i don't know that we need any more wind-up than we already have...

Fact:  If monkeys didn't need the nation-state mentality, they'd have done away with the state and gone over to corporate rule in the early 20th century, when the idea became practical.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Template

Since when have people done away with obsolete things swiftly, cleanly, efficiently?  I'd expect the timing to depend on corporate leaderships' willingness to run state-sized bits of territory.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: yhnmzw on January 13, 2010, 06:38:28 PM
Since when have people done away with obsolete things swiftly, cleanly, efficiently?  I'd expect the timing to depend on corporate leaderships' willingness to run state-sized bits of territory.

They already do that.  They have since Standard Oil and United Fruit.  But why raise your own army when you can use the US Marines?

Don't BE the government, BUY the government.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Elder Iptuous

i think current technology allows monkeyspheres to operate without the nation-state more easily now than in the last century.  it's different.
things are stickier and smaller.
besides, why do you think monkeys need the nationstate mentality?  they just need some form of tribe...
we also have groups with global reach that are neither working under the assumption that the nation-state has a monopoly on sovereignty, nor do they feel the need to clothe themselves in the legitimacy that purchasing the states' sponsorship affords.

Requia ☣

Iptuous: If you turn out to be right on this I *will* shoot you.

Then myself.
Inflatable dolls are not recognized flotation devices.

Elder Iptuous

Quote from: Requia ☣ on January 13, 2010, 07:37:01 PM
Iptuous: If you turn out to be right on this I *will* shoot you.

Then myself.

Oh, c'mon...
it'll be fun.
a real scream.

BabylonHoruv

Traditionally there's a war in the teen period of a century.  WWI, The napoleanic wars, I'm not sure what was going on in the 17 teens but I am sure there were some big fights.
You're a special case, Babylon.  You are offensive even when you don't post.

Merely by being alive, you make everyone just a little more miserable

-Dok Howl

Elder Iptuous

There was that war about the fucked up, inbred Spanish prince, right?
wasn't that pretty big?  like a good amount of Europe?

BabylonHoruv

wow, according to Wikipedia nothing happened in Europe at all between 1709 and 1720.
You're a special case, Babylon.  You are offensive even when you don't post.

Merely by being alive, you make everyone just a little more miserable

-Dok Howl

LMNO

That's why Wikipedia should not be your only source.

http://www.worldstatesmen.org/WARS.html

First and Second Northern Wars (Aug 1700 - 30 Aug 1721)

Sweden

vs.

Russia
    Denmark-Norway
    Poland



War of the Spanish Succession,  ( 7 Sep 1701 - 7 Mar 1714)
(in North America called Queen Anne's War)

War of the Quadruple Alliance (2 Aug 1718 - 17 Feb 1720)

Spain

vs.

United Kingdom
    France
    Netherlands
    Holy Roman Empire
Savoy
  Sicily


Cain

Since when did every third politics thread of mine turn into "hey, lets discuss systemic war (based on shallow datasets)" thread, anyway?  I must've missed that memo.

Fuck this, I'm going to bed.

LMNO


Elder Iptuous


Cain

OK, that was a little pissy, even by my standards.

But seriously.  Look, there was a massive project about, oh, 20 years ago now, to systematically study war in its entirety.  It was pretty big, had lots of money behind it and lots of smart people working on it.  They studied every war of the past 500 years in Europe (hardly a small sample), collected every piece of data possible, every single available metric, and analysed it to hell and back.  The analysis alone took nearly a decade to do, and the conclusions had to be written up in a book.  A heavy book.  You know what those conclusions were?

There were none.

The study showed that war was essentially impossible to predict.  And we're talking things like economic interdependence, population booms, depopulation, disease, famine, refugees, religious conflict, alliance systems, technological imbalances and a whole host of other factors.  Every single possible rule had several counterexamples, none of which matched the other in terms of what factor differed.  This was the most rigorous study of the causes of war to date, and the only firm conclusion they came to was that you can't come to a firm conclusion about war. 

They couldn't figure anything out, so I wouldn't expect anyone here to do any better.