News:

if the thee off of you are revel in the fact you ds a discordant suck it's dick and praise it's agenda? guess what bit-chit's not. hat I in fact . do you really think it'd theshare about shit, hen you should indeed tare-take if the frontage that you're into. do you really think it's the hardcore shite of the left thy t? you're little f/cking girls parackind abbot in tituts. FUCK YOU. you're latecomers, and you 're folks who don't f/cking get it. plez challenge me.

Main Menu

Applied Physics

Started by LMNO, November 29, 2010, 06:58:16 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Triple Zero

Quote from: Golden Applesauce on December 01, 2010, 02:44:36 AM
For those who didn't read the article -

If performance at higher up on the hierarchy is correlated to performance at lower levels, you should promote your best people.
If performance is uncorrelated, then you should promote your worst people.  (If Alice is a great burger flipper and Bob is a shitty burger flipper, you should promote Bob over Alice because either is just as likely as the other to be a good manager, but if you promote Alice you're out one good burger flipper.)

Random advancement is only the least bad strategy if you need one that works in both universes.

They haven't proven anything about actual promotion strategies.

thanks for summing it up, I hadn't read the article yet.

so in short, this wouldn't work for electing admins, cause admins are still active posters, so promoting one to admin doesn't give us one less active poster.
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.