News:

I live in the Promised Land, except the Chosen People are all trying to get out. 

Main Menu

Brand Identification

Started by BabylonHoruv, June 08, 2010, 09:52:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

BabylonHoruv

This is a thought that was stirred by the reappearance of the drugs thread.  One of the main things I got from it was that Dok Howl and many others on the board don't see a problem with dong drugs, it's identifying yourself as a drug user that is fucking idiotic.

I agree, but I also wanted to say that, in it's essence, it's no different than identifying yourself by any other facet of consumption.  If you are a coke person (meaning you drink coca cola)  that's about as retarded as being a coke head.  If you identify yourself by the car you drive, that's just as bad as identifying yourself by the herb you smoke.  Brand identification is something that the brands have been pushing hard, it helps them to sell if their brand is identified with a certain lifestyle, a certain kind of person.  And it transforms each of us into easily categorized consumers, instead of simply people.  It's not a surprise to see this sort of thinking associated with illicit brands as well as the legal ones.
You're a special case, Babylon.  You are offensive even when you don't post.

Merely by being alive, you make everyone just a little more miserable

-Dok Howl

BADGE OF HONOR

I certainly don't have a problem with dong drugs!

:love:
The Jerk On Bike rolled his eyes and tossed the waffle back over his shoulder--before it struck the ground, a stout, disconcertingly monkey-like dog sprang into the air and snatched it, and began to masticate it--literally--for the sound it made was like a homonculus squatting on the floor muttering "masticate masticate masticate".

hooplala

Yeah, it blows my mind when I see someone wearing a Nike t-shirt.
"Soon all of us will have special names" — Professor Brian O'Blivion

"Now's not the time to get silly, so wear your big boots and jump on the garbage clowns." — Bob Dylan?

"Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)"
— Walt Whitman

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

I don't do enough dong drugs. :(
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


BabylonHoruv

Quote from: Nigel on June 08, 2010, 09:56:34 PM
I don't do enough dong drugs. :(

Hush, viagra doesn't work that way on women.
You're a special case, Babylon.  You are offensive even when you don't post.

Merely by being alive, you make everyone just a little more miserable

-Dok Howl

Adios


Mesozoic Mister Nigel

"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."



Mesozoic Mister Nigel

However, being uncontrollably aroused for six hours has a downside.
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


Adios

Quote from: Nigel on June 08, 2010, 10:06:30 PM
However, being uncontrollably aroused for six hours has a downside.

thinking..............................................................................

failure to comprehend

end program

Mesozoic Mister Nigel

Quote from: Hawk on June 08, 2010, 10:10:05 PM
Quote from: Nigel on June 08, 2010, 10:06:30 PM
However, being uncontrollably aroused for six hours has a downside.

thinking..............................................................................

failure to comprehend

end program

:lulz:
"I'm guessing it was January 2007, a meeting in Bethesda, we got a bag of bees and just started smashing them on the desk," Charles Wick said. "It was very complicated."


ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞

Quote from: BabylonHoruv on June 08, 2010, 09:52:29 PM
This is a thought that was stirred by the reappearance of the drugs thread.  One of the main things I got from it was that Dok Howl and many others on the board don't see a problem with dong drugs, it's identifying yourself as a drug user that is fucking idiotic.

I agree, but I also wanted to say that, in it's essence, it's no different than identifying yourself by any other facet of consumption.  If you are a coke person (meaning you drink coca cola)  that's about as retarded as being a coke head.  If you identify yourself by the car you drive, that's just as bad as identifying yourself by the herb you smoke.  Brand identification is something that the brands have been pushing hard, it helps them to sell if their brand is identified with a certain lifestyle, a certain kind of person.  And it transforms each of us into easily categorized consumers, instead of simply people.  It's not a surprise to see this sort of thinking associated with illicit brands as well as the legal ones.

You've got it backwards.

People have a tendency to tie their ego to stupid fucking shit.

And they've been doing that far longer than advertisers have been exploiting it.

It's easy to blame teh evol advertisers as corrupting agents of the innately good human, but the truth is that people want symbolic material signifiers, and always have.

Advertisers don't create that need, they cater to it.

P E R   A S P E R A   A D   A S T R A

P3nT4gR4m

Quote from: Ne+@uNGr0+ on June 09, 2010, 09:55:12 AM
Quote from: BabylonHoruv on June 08, 2010, 09:52:29 PM
This is a thought that was stirred by the reappearance of the drugs thread.  One of the main things I got from it was that Dok Howl and many others on the board don't see a problem with dong drugs, it's identifying yourself as a drug user that is fucking idiotic.

I agree, but I also wanted to say that, in it's essence, it's no different than identifying yourself by any other facet of consumption.  If you are a coke person (meaning you drink coca cola)  that's about as retarded as being a coke head.  If you identify yourself by the car you drive, that's just as bad as identifying yourself by the herb you smoke.  Brand identification is something that the brands have been pushing hard, it helps them to sell if their brand is identified with a certain lifestyle, a certain kind of person.  And it transforms each of us into easily categorized consumers, instead of simply people.  It's not a surprise to see this sort of thinking associated with illicit brands as well as the legal ones.

You've got it backwards.

People have a tendency to tie their ego to stupid fucking shit.

And they've been doing that far longer than advertisers have been exploiting it.

It's easy to blame teh evol advertisers as corrupting agents of the innately good human, but the truth is that people want symbolic material signifiers, and always have.

Advertisers don't create that need, they cater to it.



THIS! Both of it. You've come up with a good point between you. Now how do I go about getting that on a baseball cap?

I'm up to my arse in Brexit Numpties, but I want more.  Target-rich environments are the new sexy.
Not actually a meat product.
Ass-Kicking & Foot-Stomping Ancient Master of SHIT FUCK FUCK FUCK
Awful and Bent Behemothic Results of Last Night's Painful Squat.
High Altitude Haggis-Filled Sex Bucket From Beyond Time and Space.
Internet Monkey Person of Filthy and Immoral Pygmy-Porn Wart Contagion
Octomom Auxillary Heat Exchanger Repairman
walking the fine line line between genius and batshit fucking crazy

"computation is a pattern in the spacetime arrangement of particles, and it's not the particles but the pattern that really matters! Matter doesn't matter." -- Max Tegmark

Placid Dingo

Though it's natural to identify with things.

That's why people here have avartars (or conspiculously don't I'm not playing innocent), screen-names, signitures etc. That's why people are Discordian. But I agree, the brand as an identifying point is quite daft.

Tribes can be quite useful, and fantastic. But they're they're to meet your needs, not so you cater to them.
Haven't paid rent since 2014 with ONE WEIRD TRICK.

P3nT4gR4m

Read this the other day. It's along the same lines. Cult of celebrity aint that much different from brand identification on one level.

Quote
NP:
Tell-All explores the concept of celebrity. Why do you think as a society we're so celebrity obsessed?

CP:
My crackpot theory is that people are losing their skill to express themselves, and they're, in a way, farming that task out. If they want to express themselves they buy a song or they buy a greeting card that's already processed by someone who's kept that skill. We can't express our own feelings anymore so we have to hire someone to do that. To a large extent movies take that on, they're our therapy and our expression.

Source

I'm up to my arse in Brexit Numpties, but I want more.  Target-rich environments are the new sexy.
Not actually a meat product.
Ass-Kicking & Foot-Stomping Ancient Master of SHIT FUCK FUCK FUCK
Awful and Bent Behemothic Results of Last Night's Painful Squat.
High Altitude Haggis-Filled Sex Bucket From Beyond Time and Space.
Internet Monkey Person of Filthy and Immoral Pygmy-Porn Wart Contagion
Octomom Auxillary Heat Exchanger Repairman
walking the fine line line between genius and batshit fucking crazy

"computation is a pattern in the spacetime arrangement of particles, and it's not the particles but the pattern that really matters! Matter doesn't matter." -- Max Tegmark