News:

I know you said that you wouldn't tolerate excuses, but I have a real good one.

Main Menu

Would one of you scientist-types PLEASE debunk this?

Started by East Coast Hustle, July 13, 2010, 07:01:40 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jasper

An engineering friend of mine had an idea like this when he was still in middle school.  The idea was to use a gigantic nuclear bomb to cause a tidal wave of superheated water to wash over a coastal town.  Later, upon learning more about physics, he decided it wouldn't work so well.

Shame about the world not ending though, eh?

Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: Sigmatic on July 13, 2010, 07:30:32 PM
An engineering friend of mine had an idea like this when he was still in middle school.  The idea was to use a gigantic nuclear bomb to cause a tidal wave of superheated water to wash over a coastal town.  Later, upon learning more about physics, he decided it wouldn't work so well.

Shame about the world not ending though, eh?

As long as it isn't Boston or Galway.  :)
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS

GIGGLES

Quote from: Triple Zero on July 13, 2010, 04:53:16 PM
I wondered about when the article described the resulting tsunami as "supersonic"--is that even possible? A wave of water moving faster than the speed of sound?

IF SOMETHING STRUCK THE WATER WITH SUFFICIENT FORCE IT IS POSSIBLE BUT THE WATER WOULD MOST LIKELY BE VAPORIZED BY THE HEAT CAUSED BY THE SHEER KINETIC FORCE BUT THIS IS ALL IGNORING THE FACT THAT IF SOMETHING STRUCK WITH WATER WITH SUCH FORCE WE WOULD HAVE MUCH BIGGER PROBLEMS THAN A TSUNAMI.

...I MEAN, LOLDONGS! SCIENCE IS FOR HOMOS!

Doktor Howl

Molon Lube

East Coast Hustle

Quote from: Kai on July 13, 2010, 03:01:47 PM
Quote from: Exit City Hustle on July 13, 2010, 02:33:23 PM
Quote from: Kai on July 13, 2010, 02:18:30 PM
Quote from: Exit City Hustle on July 13, 2010, 07:01:40 AM
http://www.helium.com/items/1882339-doomsday-how-bp-gulf-disaster-may-have-triggered-a-world-killing-event

The article assumes we actually know how the Permian extinction event happened, and that it was caused by a giant methane bubble explosion. Except we don't know how it happened, only that 96% of species present in the fossil record went extinct at the end of the Permian, leaving a 4 million year geologic dead space with few fossils. The methane hypothesis is yet unsupported. So the premise that the entire article is based upon isn't supported.

There, debunked.

fair enough, but I'm more interested in why this can't happen now, not whether or not it happened millions of years ago.

I'm not concerned that the entire world will die or anything like that, but I am concerned about the whole "mega-tsunami" thing given that I'm going to be spending most of my time in close proximity to that part of the world.

http://io9.com/5585294/methane-bubble-doomsday-story-debunked

sweet. Thanks Kai!
Rabid Colostomy Hole Jammer of the Coming Apocalypse™

The Devil is in the details; God is in the nuance.


Some yahoo yelled at me, saying 'GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH', and I thought, "I'm feeling generous today.  Why not BOTH?"

East Coast Hustle

Quote from: Sigmatic on July 13, 2010, 07:30:32 PM
An engineering friend of mine had an idea like this when he was still in middle school.  The idea was to use a gigantic nuclear bomb to cause a tidal wave of superheated water to wash over a coastal town.  Later, upon learning more about physics, he decided it wouldn't work so well.

Shame about the world not ending though, eh?

why wouldn't he just detonate the giant nuclear bomb in the town square?

also, Boston deserves this, if only to rid the world of Red Sox fans.
Rabid Colostomy Hole Jammer of the Coming Apocalypse™

The Devil is in the details; God is in the nuance.


Some yahoo yelled at me, saying 'GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH', and I thought, "I'm feeling generous today.  Why not BOTH?"

LMNO

The entire team is on the DL.  Isn't that enough?

Jasper

Quote from: Exit City Hustle on July 14, 2010, 03:26:28 PM
Quote from: Sigmatic on July 13, 2010, 07:30:32 PM
An engineering friend of mine had an idea like this when he was still in middle school.  The idea was to use a gigantic nuclear bomb to cause a tidal wave of superheated water to wash over a coastal town.  Later, upon learning more about physics, he decided it wouldn't work so well.

Shame about the world not ending though, eh?

why wouldn't he just detonate the giant nuclear bomb in the town square?

also, Boston deserves this, if only to rid the world of Red Sox fans.


One thing I've picked up from his 'nuke phase' was that, although the fireball is impressive, the most devastating use of nukes is when you detonate them high up in the air, and not on the ground or underwater.

Nephew Twiddleton

Quote from: Sigmatic on July 14, 2010, 05:56:55 PM
Quote from: Exit City Hustle on July 14, 2010, 03:26:28 PM
Quote from: Sigmatic on July 13, 2010, 07:30:32 PM
An engineering friend of mine had an idea like this when he was still in middle school.  The idea was to use a gigantic nuclear bomb to cause a tidal wave of superheated water to wash over a coastal town.  Later, upon learning more about physics, he decided it wouldn't work so well.

Shame about the world not ending though, eh?

why wouldn't he just detonate the giant nuclear bomb in the town square?

also, Boston deserves this, if only to rid the world of Red Sox fans.


One thing I've picked up from his 'nuke phase' was that, although the fireball is impressive, the most devastating use of nukes is when you detonate them high up in the air, and not on the ground or underwater.


Apparently detonating them in orbit causes widespread EMP damage on Earth.
Strange and Terrible Organ Laminator of Yesterday's Heavy Scene
Sentence or sentence fragment pending

Soy El Vaquero Peludo de Oro

TIM AM I, PRIMARY OF THE EXTRA-ATMOSPHERIC SIMIANS