MATLAB ? 2010 ? 2011 ?

[hirley0]

If time were to stop, how long would it stop for?

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html {source

[rong]

That was in response to your link, although if time slows down as an object approaches the speed of light, wouldn't that make light timeless?

[hirley0]

Lev{atation}? 9:27 8/22 2011

That was in response to your link, although if time slows down as an object approaches the speed of light, wouldn't that make light timeless?

3:21 B lemme get back 2this Later /-/Ub' 8/22 Monday

Re: MATLAB ? 2010 ? 2011 ?  (Read 1083 times)
Reply #62 on: Today at 03:21:08 AM
Quote from: rong on Yesterday at 03:24:22 PM
That was in response to your link, although if time slows down as an object approaches the speed of light, wouldn't that make light timeless?

3:21 B lemme get back 2this Later /-/Ub' 8/22 Mon
things seen & things UNscene ?  Religion?
once upon a time i was in the Navy & I Levatede at that
TIME, i'LL try to find a link to the event and include A LiNk Later
In Navy? i Levated in a gravity wave pod? in a Gravity wave
pod time dialiats (events slow) Light entering the EYE has longer to
form an image on the retna and so object become very detailed & sharp
the problem arose upon the LEAVING the POD. the time
DiLaTion was reversed & thUS a moment of time compression took place
Velocity (of rate times TIME = Distance) increased into eXponentials

new color to be added later. the ResuLt was extream forces were encountered
opun landing & solid steal welds neay broken (ouch} My point is this
I do NOT believe in the ScientisT'$ belief in the HoLLyNess of the
:"SECOND": WHether they use cgs or MKS . to me ever S is different

in the same way as ever Month is etc. I use Milli Second as My Std
Unit to avoid aLL ScientISt$ and do NOT USe S in its normaL role.
Back to the Question. is light Timeless? My guess is some R & some
R not it depends of from whence they come & where they  aRe headed

i did try to look at a spectrum off of a CD | it sure was Bright?
much brigter than i was expecting. and rather smaLL ----- & I saw
no absorbtion LiNe it Looked continIOUs to me ( i guess because of
dimemention? i donno, My eQUipment does NOT resolve the Lines

The QUestions aRe beyound my ability to grasp (I have no POD
generater to place Light in, to slow it & comprehend its duRation?
whether it has been streached & painted BLUE or compressed & painted
RED { that is probably backwards ) Blue(compressed) Red(streched)

4:56AM pdT for post at 4B? 3 min late

[Faust]

That was in response to your link, although if time slows down as an object approaches the speed of light, wouldn't that make light timeless?

,

Eh not quite.

Light actually travels at slightly below the absolute maximum possible speed. And while time slows, it doesn't stop, even the dilation that occurs between two objects say the earth, and a satalite approaching the speed of light for five minutes, an hour even, its quite slim.

Photons of light are very low in mass, even on the atomic scale photons are relatively low compared to electrons or the nucleus of an atom. But their mass is still high enough that their time frame is measurable in comparison to our average time.

[rong]

@Faust - so "light speed" or "c" is actually higher than actual light speed?

@hirley - i really asked "if time were to stop, how long would it stop for?" to imply the existence of another dimension.  i.e. if time were to stop, nobody would notice as everything would be frozen until time resumed.  the only way to measure the length of the stop would be to have another "time outside time" from which to measure it.

i've always had a difficult time understanding the relationship between velocity and time.  i'm able to "see it on paper" but as soon as i try to visualize it, my reality tunnel gets in the way.

i have often imagined that another way to percieve experience of time is to say that everyone lives 1 life-time, but some travel through time faster than others therefore experience more or less years. might explain why some people are so quick witted and others are "slower"

why did the existentialist go to the eye doctor?
because he was now sighted

[Faust]

@Faust - so "light speed" or "c" is actually higher than actual light speed?

No, light speed is light speed, but the absolute theoretical fastest possible speed is ever so slightly above that.

[hirley0]

9:33&1/3 weLL Later then:
-
this was going to be about something, i 4got & I AM out of time too .-.'
= =
well aLmost now why L wrong

[Rumckle]

http://photos2.meetupstatic.com/photos/member/3/e/3/b/highres_22035931.jpeg

I think I took the E to be the one to the left of the ones you marked b1-4 and then b1-4 was the on the right of that (I can't remember though). Also the way I checked the scaling was to compare how many pixels across the lines were (and adding the width of all previous lines) vs the suspected wavelengths, then plot. But your method seems to work out nicely.

[hirley0]

http://photos2.meetupstatic.com/photos/member/3/e/3/b/highres_22035931.jpeg

I think I took the E to be the one to the left of the ones you marked b1-4 and then b1-4 was the on the right of that (I can't remember though). Also the way I checked the scaling was to compare how many pixels across the lines were (and adding the width of all previous lines) vs the suspected wavelengths, then plot. But your method seems to work out nicely.

My laTest Regurgatation of `Er  StuFF
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html {source


I've tried to number the lines / bottom up / sodium D #32
i easily could miss count however +, added a SIX nano
scale Left to Right ? HOWEVER my guess is its NOT 6
precisely so there is possibly a drift line to line that is
NOT account for. oh My {thank for looking {{ i'LL
soon return to my The ELectron theory in A prior thread

[hirley0]

REV 20110908 REMoved img / due to revised calculation of F_o 4:28b REPLACEMENT

My laTest Regurgatation of `Er  StuFF

8:03B

20110823 7:40 AM pdT OK? while its on my mind:
-
the search for (SC) Solar Chronology Starts from the NasTa Spec
= =
& of course because (sc) is variable it cannot be found from A
single frame BUT must be derived from the video rather than photo
: : :
B_side it probably (n it more pur form) wont be found in the Visual
its probably going to appear as (i mean in) RADIO?  my first guess
was 2.4gHz 41-44 nanos but after Ms concideration i'LL try again
? ? ? ?
intead of the FAR (UV) (41-44) i'LL try NEAR (IR) > 1000 nM
OK? one Thousand NanoMeters may be (1/1e-9)one thousand MegaHz
OR 1gHz if U must? thUS i'LL pick 444 mHz as my new (SC) line
and try to comprehend what such siLLiness is trying to suggest
/TilT\
YES: i guess my RADIO shack Pro-59 (could be) adjusted to listen
in somewhere around there? what i need now is some way of Looking
for the transition required for such a movement, WHAT electron
Jump would cause a 444mHz period to be propgandized abouT the sYs
~bt~ 8:00 AM pdT going to Look time?
8:27 http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/sodzee.html
8:35 sYs overload = Reset delay include
8:43 http://earthmatrix-muniments.com/id30.html
.BB. ReRegurgatate Time 8:43 AM
41 nano was rong (Right}? what i wanted was 444mHz (Correct)
I want F not Laambda ?/? thUS try to convert one to the other
9  /  5       6562.08  A. = ? H {{{1/(656.208e-9)=1523907.054
WHAT? ONE point FIVE mHz someting is fisshYYY {{1/440e6=2e-9

(UV)(IR)

Rev8/24 read 1175 times SOURCE}
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html
img REMoved 20110908 REPLACEMENT below


10:01 AM at about the same time
-
while thinking about a photon to radio wave converter
= =
i'LL recaLL some prior years /RADAR\  the output of RF at the
feedhorn could be converted to visable light with an NE45 lamp
: : :
thus it was know (long ago) RF could be converted to photon
using a neon bulb? as the energy was absorbed & reEmitted ?
My guess is that is a one way idea RF > photon
? ? ? ?
thUS my first guess is there exists some energy ratio between
the two fields with RF having a higher energy content than P
the differance between a calm & a stormy sea. both seas diff E
perhaps focusing a lot of NA589y on a Salt crystal with cat wisker?
/TilT\
anyway it is my guess that (YES): an SC (sOLAR cHRONOLOGY) wiLL
be found, probably in the next decade & it (SC) wiLL have SOMe
interesting insights into the aeTHeater & Fields in general.
i'LL of course try to stay tuned here at discord & avoid the
~bt~
athortians as to OREthEodoxologistic for my taste bud. yeah? ok
it is given that RF (Radio Frequency eXmissions) can & do cause
conversions of mater (say Neon) into an emmisive (active state)
&i 4one ask myself should there be limits inposed on the fields
.BB.
i do not know. it does REMind me however of my electron tail
once in a damp dark space on a comercial grain ship I was
knocked flat (not once but twice) by hi voltage electrons.
So yes i do believe in eLectrons thou i've never seen one.

decimal points have a way of getting away from me easily
thUS be very VERY weary of conclusions based upon this Reduction

[hirley0]

My laTest Regurgatation of `Er  StuFF

8:03B
search for (SC) Solar Chronology Starts from the NasTa Spec
= ? ? ? ?
instead of the FAR (UV) (41-44) i'LL try NEAR (IR) > 1000 nM
OK? one Thousand NanoMeters may be (1/1e-9)one thousand MegaHz
OR 1gHz if U must? thUS i'LL pick 444 mHz as my new (SC) line
/TilT\
instead of the FAR (UV) (41-44) i'LL try NEAR (IR) > 1000 nM
OK? one Thousand NanoMeters may be (1/1000e-9)one thousand "Kilo"Hz
OR 1mHz if U must? thUS i'LL pick (C)1.525 mHz as my new (SC) line
actually 1520 to 1530 on the AM radio dial (as soon as i convert P to E {fields

10:01 AM at about the same time
-
RF  to visable light with an NE45 lamp
/TilT\
REMember also RF could be focused using optical Lenze :

decimal points have a way of getting away from me easily
thUS be very VERY weary of conclusions based upon this Reduction

this REV did get the fickle fringer of slow 1mbm awared = disconnect etc.

[hirley0]

20110827 9:32AM  "Not Math Hour".
-
Allright with that in place 8/27 Math
= =
Let me ASk the web what is the differance between a photon of
light and an electromagnetic radio wave of 1525 KiloHz ?
: : :
in terms of energy content per unit of time i'poise ?
9:44AM no solution is forth comming |antenna vs Filiment}?
having tuned the AM band from 1330 to 1600ish
????
i get a broad band signel of what sounds to me like FAX
a reptious bleet bleat blee ove & over 1330} |/bbb\?/bbb\_
i think theres a 1410 station & maybe a third / fax over
the top end is vacant 1600-20? {this was NOT any help?/?10:50
/TiLT\
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atacama_Desert
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=33196
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-14205720
movie
~bt~
Cannot play media.You do not have the correct v
yeah? i do I Just no longer use Flash in any flaVor
http://eands.caltech.edu/articles/LXVII4/chile.html
i do see 26GHz & 36GHz mentioned in a .JPG_photo
.BB.
bUTT Babby was i looking in the wrong hole for the wrong #
Listen I WAS Listening to 1330 & 1450 kbps on the AM dial.
it has been years & Years & YEARS since i.Ve pressed the
AM buTTon . 12:00 PM 8/27 11:07:11 B


20110827 12:19 PM ? ? ? ? 12:07B
OVRO
astro.caltech
thesis500 MHz to 50 GHz
thesis carbon monoxide
: : :
I GUESS IT goes without say prime eXample of (ES) Enforced stupidity
see smaLL print at bottom of page. Anyway: thinking back from 500MHz's
i get 2 nano'$ vs 400 for Violet {oh my) WeLL my theory on This neads F5
= =
My guess has to be its short hop vs long skip.
true i could have even this backword. never mind: in aLL's probability's THEY
-
aRE NOT EVEN talking about eLectron OREbits but Hot Molicules of Gas -321 etc

8/28 it goes without saying:
i,ve cooked up a new revision }Now hg 546n 1.8MHz & mg 518n 1.9 look
like something NOT to ask NasTa to provide data 4Me to. Go green chair

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/bios/cottam/cottam_image.html {orign

8th color "GREEN" SO? anyway i sent off an e-Mail to 3
at caltec ?/? i rather doubt that i'LL get any responce as i poise its
shut down for HeaT wave, Hi Water, or just Fake Break
bottom line as i reMove on is the  entry point sent .. Si' Ya?

default entry point for "SC" Solar Cronology post 69

please observe #70 also {the correction of error in #69 } left as entered /-/

[hirley0]

8/29 6.5 pdT commence monitoring AM 1330 -16?? for ? 1 hr during TV news
NooN weLL i did Listen / with no photon to RF converter its pointless
12:11 " We did not find results for: differance between a photon of light at 655.74 nm and an electromagnetic radio wave of 1525 KiloHz. " {Look here:
8/30 there were clouds last night. reflected sunlight NOT seen: 31same
9/1 R post 4 deleted & 5 added into its space {index(1) revised
9/2 R 999 propaganda 4 iPhONE & aFORDable etc  
9/3 UpDate of sum Links & MoOn shots S&Jv2
9/4 ^P'2t
-------------------2nd 8 ------------------------
9/5 I'Z trying to get back to links {goto'$}
9/6 Mus 9/5-13 & RF.1400 +v77
9/7 (L&M)N color StD R is not(L&M)
----Tuesday=teal----
U/8 serious hacking / rev08.spec2Fo
F/9 9-F

[hirley0]

6:56B? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_least_squares_%28mathematics%29 7:55pd

Last Edit:    Today at 07:07:56 AM First

8:19pd http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_linear_regression 7:18B 07:18:54 AM

7:25 http://www.hackchina.com/en/s/schwefel  07:25:33 AM
7:29 http://www.hackchina.com/en/r/114640/ha.m__html 07:30:27
=======================================/
07:41:12 AM by hirley cslms 8:39pd
--------------
i began a matlab set using diary to get the folowing
%  Day_n =  20110909 t_Start =   858
%% My
%%% Approach
%%%% to the Q U est I ON

lookfor regres & && {not found
lookfor least
help fitnorm
lookfor exampl
mathlist
datalist
demo

%  t_End = 912 t_Spent =  14  diary off

8:35 that was no to helpfull so i tried  http://www.me.pdx.edu/~gerry/nmm

37 function [c,R2] = linefit(x,y)
% linefit    Least-squares fit of data to y = c(1)*x + c(2)
%
% Synopsis:   c     = linefit(x,y)
%            [c,R2] = linefit(x,y)
%
% Input:   x,y = vectors of independent and dependent variables
%
% Output:  c  = vector of slope, c(1), and intercept, c(2) of least sq. line fit
%          R2 = (optional) coefficient of determination; 0 <= R2 <= 1
%               R2 close to 1 indicates a strong relationship between y and x
if length(y)~= length(x),  error('x and y are not compatible');  end

x = x(;  y = y(;    %  Make sure that x and y are column vectors
A = [x ones(size(x))];  %  m-by-n matrix of overdetermined system
c = (A'*A)\(A'*y);      %  Solve normal equations
if nargout>1
  r = y - A*c;
  R2 = 1 - (norm(r)/norm(y-mean(y)))^2;
end
39 have not ATTempted to use this | its my approach | don't U C

[hirley0]

%%%%% Day_n = 20110909 t_Start =   1046
% lime 0
%% maroon 1
%%% NAVY "dependant" y
%%%% Teal "independant" T or t

X=-1:.1:1; % preamble cooking up a # = fake data
Y=rand(size(X)); %% appli'N heat
plot(X,Y)

% ok make that y = Y
y=Y;
t=X+1; %%% maid independant

help linefit % %%   linefit    Least-squares fit of data

linefit(t,y) %%% ans =  0.1006   0.3773
q=ans %%% q(1) % slope  0.1006 intercept 0.3773

r=t*q(1)+q(2);
plot(t,y,'r+',t,r,'b-')

%%% it is NOT clear to me at this time if i used the correct colors
PM RED=rawBLUE=bakedappears reasonable to me
however i notice from the two wiki links above that iT iS Not A Standard

%% t_End =  1105 t_Spent =  19
% linefit is in NMM toolbox see Gerry? link above ?/? & listed above  

-------------------
http://www.ecampus.com/adaptive-filter-theory-4th-haykin-simon/bk/9780130901262

.1 8:49AM lemme say this then
2: i use a TI 83 for regression not matlab
3? 8:51AM My ti book is on loan so 4get this
---------------------------------------------
10:17AM yeah its VERY clear to me at this time?
THAT a snipit of " dependent variable " y is where to begin
i'LL try to make A "dependent variable"y from"independent"X
X=-1:.1:1; y=rand(size(X)); % I HAVE NOT TRIED THIS YET !-!
10:33AM

9/10 s GREEN ? Time to move On 12:18Brd