Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Telarus

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 307
Techmology and Scientism / Re: Somehow, not the future I saw coming.
« on: November 10, 2016, 02:22:48 am »
 :eek: :aaa: That's fucking boss.

Oh hai.  :fnord:



Someone let RHWN know that he's a monumental failure.

I would, but he blocked me from his fart-huffing google group.

Oh wow, first I saw this result out of Maine. HAHAHAHA.  :lulz: :lulz: :lulz: :lulz:

Oh, hi.  :evilmad: :fnord: :eek:

Aneristic Illusions / NSA Insider Book: Untangling the Web
« on: May 29, 2016, 02:00:31 am »

Seems to be one guy at the NSA's view of Chapel Perilous. The scanned intro makes me wonder if this wing of the Chapel had any influence.  :fnord:

Now, at 650 pages, there's far too much to go into in depth here, but fortunately, as you can see from the table of contents...

you don't have to go very far before this takes a hard turn into "Dungeons and Dragons campaign/Classics major's undergraduate thesis" territory. The preface employs a comical number of metaphors to describe what the internet is and isn't - sometimes two a paragraph. But don't take our word for it! According to the NSA, the internet is ...

A Persian's personal library:

Sisyphus' boulder ...

A Freudian psycho-sexual pleasure palace ...

A Borgesian world-consuming knowledge-cancer ...

A labyrinth (with bonus Mino-Troll):

Two quick asides - one, in case your memory needed jogging as to what a clew was, the footnote helpfully provides that information ...

and two, before you cry foul that the beast in the center of the labyrinth is clearly a centaur, Ovid technically just describes the Minotaur as "half-man and half-bull" without specifying which half is which, so that interpretation is valid, if a bit needlessly obscure. But while we're on the subject of pedantic footnotes ...

A shape-changing sea-god:

And finally, jumping ahead 600 pages, an endless frontier/a cemetery of dead ideas/a reminder of your aunt's 15-minutes of fame:

Yeah, still around.... sometimes.

Principia Discussion / Re: Law of Fives on Binary
« on: September 20, 2015, 11:11:00 pm »
This follows the 5 cycles/seasons, as presented in the Appendices of the Illuminatus! Trilogy: Chaos, Discord, Confusion, Bureaucracy, Aftermath.
Also known as Thesis(this), Anti-Thesis(that), Synthesis(both), Parentheses(neither), Paralysis(loosening or shutting down of the old order to allow something new or in-between to emerge).

Principia Discussion / Re: Discordia/Eris's role in the French Revolution?
« on: September 20, 2015, 11:00:29 pm »
 :lulz: :fnord:

The Empress Nigel and The Good Reverend Roger have made very salient points. One should meditate on them deeply (that means breathing deeply and with regular timing once the sense of horrormirth at your own paradoxically both-insignificant-and-overwhelmingly-powerful place in the universe sets in... ... ... there we go, keep breathing... no, no that anxiety won't ever go away completely... keep breathing...).

Principia Discussion / Re: What ever happened to the counter-culture?
« on: September 20, 2015, 10:48:29 pm »
..We are reactionaries to order. Everyone can tolerate so much order in their life. Some more than others, which is why there are a select few who turn to chaos based groups.

False (and you have fallen for the Eristic Illusion). Chaos != Disorder.

Principia Discussion / Re: Discordians De Illuminati?
« on: September 20, 2015, 10:42:19 pm »
Wow, that tumblr post complete misses the point.

Bring and Brag / Re: Awesome posing accident
« on: March 15, 2015, 08:28:49 pm »
 :lulz: Love the happy accidents.

« on: February 07, 2015, 08:02:50 pm »

Aneristic Illusions / Re: Duh Rugs
« on: February 07, 2015, 07:52:21 pm »

Last year the mainstream media was quick to highlight a study from Northwestern University that implied there were structural changes in the brains of people who smoked marijuana, even occasionally. The dubious research was sponsored by groups biased against marijuana including the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP).

Now a new, study published in the Journal of Neuroscience has completely debunked those claims. Researchers at the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder and the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville created a trial to attempt to replicate the earlier results but could not.

Participants in the new study were were both adults and adolescents. They were given brain MRIs and carefully selected as those who consume cannabis and those who do not. But this time people who use alcohol were excluded from the study.

The results were clear, "No statistically significant differences were found between daily users and nonusers on volume or shape in the regions of interest," the authors stated.

A cornerstone of modern medical science is not just a single experiment but results that can be replicated again and again.

The researchers in Boulder and Louisville put the issue to bed with their conclusion; "In sum, the results indicate that, when carefully controlling for alcohol use, gender, age, and other variables, there is no association between marijuana use and standard volumetric or shape measurements of subcortical structures."

Neurobiology of Disease
Daily Marijuana Use Is Not Associated with Brain Morphometric Measures in Adolescents or Adults

Beyond the wall / Re: IS THAT CAINAD?
« on: January 03, 2015, 11:06:37 pm »


This is the second time someone has found that out of the blue.

 :lulz: :lulz:

Beyond the wall / Re: ITT: New Years Revelations
« on: December 31, 2014, 10:50:05 pm »

Aneristic Illusions / Re: Random News Stories
« on: December 31, 2014, 10:18:20 pm »
I found it a terrible spy movie. I found it a HILARIOUS take on how far the intelligence community has infiltrated Hollywood.

I mean, "the North-Korea guy" from RAND was having 3rd party communications with DoD officials (through the producer) about "the ending", knowing the film would eventually get to NK and the politics of showing a living head of state die onscreen at the hands of American entertainers. Part of these conversations ended up forcing Rogan to bargain with reducing the imaginary CG burn marks on Un's face ("We have removed 3 of the 4 burn marks and reduced the overall flesh burning... is this acceptable?") in order to actually show him die in the way the script intended.

I found a lot of the film to be parallel jokes on exactly this kind of shit. Bu no, it did not live up to the hype generated by the surrounding spectacle.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 307