Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - LMNO

Pages: 1 ... 1661 1662 1663 [1664] 1665 1666 1667 ... 2140
24946
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: Break Your Chains
« on: April 25, 2008, 04:03:50 pm »
Anything else I say on this matter seems like  :deadhorse:

Quote from: Eris
Oh.  Well, then stop.

24947
I meant the people posting in this thread about braindrugs.

24948
Techmology and Scientism / Re: MATH IS HARD
« on: April 25, 2008, 02:24:42 pm »



24949
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: Break Your Chains
« on: April 25, 2008, 02:13:30 pm »
But, if I have this metaphor right, all the circuits work in tandem.  An agressive C2 is shaped by all the others.  No one is "only" one circuit.  After all, if this was only about C2, we wouldn't find it funny.  Humor seems to reside in C3 and up.

In any case, calling the n00b-bashing gigglehate a dominant-submissive game really misses the point, because it's the internets.  This game has so many more options than up-down, back-forth.

24950
Well, it's good to know y'all have something in common with Scientologists...

24951
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: Break Your Chains
« on: April 25, 2008, 01:54:10 pm »
Durk, so what if it's our "programming" that lets us enjoy gigglehate?

I'm not sure I'm understanding why you seem to be ascribing fourth-circuit morality to second-circuit behavior, and why you somehow think that C4 is "better" than C2*.

You say you understand that we are all programmed, and that it's up to each individual to choose their programming, when possible.  So why do you feel that yours is so superior?

If you don't want to participate in the gigglehate, then follow the words of Eris:  "Oh.  Well, then stop."




















*Well, if we're talking explosives, then yes.

24952
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: Break Your Chains
« on: April 24, 2008, 08:04:47 pm »
  The immediate hateshit that pinealists MAY incur, imho, does nothing for anyone.  

Are you forgetting that many of us consider it FUN, and actually are laughing while we do it?


If we can postulate "horrormirth," there's certainly enough room for "gigglehate".

No, I realize that, and I partially took that comment back.  However, the notion that it's fun is often a ruse for what's really going on.   I think people abuse the hell out of the emotion, and sometimes it's legitimate fun, and other times it's just circuit 2 programming.   I think if you're too frivolous with it, you'll fail to recognize the difference between when circuit 2 kicks in, and when it's just having fun with words.



 :tinfoilhat:

24953
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: Break Your Chains
« on: April 24, 2008, 07:33:34 pm »
  The immediate hateshit that pinealists MAY incur, imho, does nothing for anyone.  

Are you forgetting that many of us consider it FUN, and actually are laughing while we do it?


If we can postulate "horrormirth," there's certainly enough room for "gigglehate".

24954
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: Break Your Chains
« on: April 24, 2008, 04:35:51 pm »
But you also understand, of course, that it's not people coming in talking about PD, it's people coming in and spewing shit about their pineal glands.

24955
It almost makes me wish he found Jesus instead.

24956
Or Kill Me / Re: The First Church of the Holy Lie
« on: April 24, 2008, 03:40:25 pm »
 :argh!:



LMNO
-polesmoker.

24957
Actually, what I'ms saying is that my brother went off meds due to the Co$ belief system, and when he didn't suffer another psychotic break, this "proved" to him that scientology is right.

24958
Or Kill Me / Re: The First Church of the Holy Lie
« on: April 24, 2008, 03:15:06 pm »
Suggestion, not rule.

But, yeah. 



Sorry Shooby, please re-read my reply in 33 more posts.

24959
Yeah.  I wish there was more hard evidence.

One of the reasons my brother believes the scientology mumbo-jumbo is because his disorder cleared up around the same time as he started the Co$ stuff.


Coincidental "cures" are coincidental... OR ARE THEY?

24960
Think for Yourself, Schmuck! / Re: BIP and impermanance
« on: April 24, 2008, 02:06:30 pm »
I agree with RWHN.  Burns, it looks like you're building a pretty nice motorcycle; keep going with it.

Pages: 1 ... 1661 1662 1663 [1664] 1665 1666 1667 ... 2140