Probably, maybe, needs to be re-visited.
By the power of lulz, I, while living, have conquered the internets.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
So if anyone's reality is validated as being true within the BIP meta-structure (as it were) then basically anything goes!Quote from: LMNOYou know I‚Äôm gonna ask you to define ‚Äútruth,‚Äù right?
In the context of how I said it; 'true' is anyone's version of reality however they go about validating it. Whereas 'false' normally would be a worldview that is riddled with BS. (noted this is posted on an discordian forum.-heh)
If taken to mean 'truth' then maybe in the sense of the 'truth according to Garp or Joe or Dags or LMNO or whoever' arise contradictions about reality then what? All are true and none false? I know this presents a dichotomy but it's about nothing specific where other options may present themselves such as differences of perspective and such.
Regarding the truth of BIP is it taken at face value? Without much questioning it's underlying assumptions. The first HIP took a look at a dissemination process where it's accepted without question as 'being cool'. Is 'accepted without questioning' what BIP is about? So what could make BIP false or an interpretation of BIP false? If it's nothing much then what does that say?