News:

PD.com: You wont believe our bullshit

Main Menu

Hello, I am a Christian Discordian

Started by imposter, June 07, 2007, 08:32:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

I Am Not A Rhombus

Christian Discordianism; eh?

I've made a promotional poster for this new religion.


Cramulus


LMNO

I am now officially glad we didn't run you off.

Triple Zero

Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

LMNO

FUCK YOU!  MY MOM DIED BECAUSE SHE WAS EASY TO PLEASE!












...er... I don't think that came out right.

AFK

Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

Triple Zero

Quote from: LMNO on October 09, 2007, 06:56:08 PM
...er... I don't think that came out right.

is that how she died, then?
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

AFK

Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

PopeTom

Quote from: I Am Not A Rhombus on October 09, 2007, 05:24:25 PM
Quote from: PopeTom on June 07, 2007, 08:34:27 AM
Most major world religions are tequila, Discorianism is like beer.

Basically Discordianism is the religion you drink from once you have had your fill of the major religions of the world.



So Atheists are Tee Totalers; and Agnostics are so thoroughly pissed they can't tell whether there's a drink in front of them or not?

No, Atheists are also chasing the worm like anyone else who comments on theological matters.

I've on occasion said that I am a Discordian because it's the theological leaning that best compliments my Atheism.
-PopeTom

I am the result of 13.75 ± 0.13 billion years of random chance. Now that I exist I see no reason to start planning and organizing everything in my life.

Random dumb luck got me here, random dumb luck will get me to where I'm going.

Hail Eris!

PopeTom

Quote from: triple zero on October 09, 2007, 06:00:42 PM
LMNOs point was that atheists are also religious.

or at least alcoholic.


I would not agree with the first statement, but I would agree with the second.
-PopeTom

I am the result of 13.75 ± 0.13 billion years of random chance. Now that I exist I see no reason to start planning and organizing everything in my life.

Random dumb luck got me here, random dumb luck will get me to where I'm going.

Hail Eris!

PopeTom

Quote from: LMNO on October 09, 2007, 06:04:30 PM
A definitive and unshaking beleif that there is no God is just as religous as a definitive and unshaking belief that there is a God.

While there are Atheists who hold an unshakable belief that there is no God(s) Richard Dawkins is not one of them.

Have you read The God Delusion?  I need to get my copy back from Forest, but you are welcome to borrow it when I do.
-PopeTom

I am the result of 13.75 ± 0.13 billion years of random chance. Now that I exist I see no reason to start planning and organizing everything in my life.

Random dumb luck got me here, random dumb luck will get me to where I'm going.

Hail Eris!

Cain

I can upload a pdf, for those who want it.

Purely so they can read before they decide to buy.

Triple Zero

borrowed it from a friend last week, waiting until i get some time to read it.
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

Cramulus


I Am Not A Rhombus

Quote from: PopeTom on October 09, 2007, 11:31:04 PM
Quote from: LMNO on October 09, 2007, 06:04:30 PM
A definitive and unshaking beleif that there is no God is just as religous as a definitive and unshaking belief that there is a God.

While there are Atheists who hold an unshakable belief that there is no God(s) Richard Dawkins is not one of them.

Have you read The God Delusion?  I need to get my copy back from Forest, but you are welcome to borrow it when I do.


Yeah, people get the wrong idea about Dawkins. While I disagree with him on some things I still respect him for being outspoken. It's purely because he's outspoken that he gets thrown in the "Atheist loon" pile. I feel the same thing would have happened to Michael Moore regardless of the quality/accuracy of his movies. People are sickeningly apathetic and don't want to be told to care about things unless it can be presented to them in the most official and systematic way possible; which gives us a problem since some things can't be presented in that way at all; like say "Think for yourself". People just demonise the outspoken these days.

Honestly; who is more likely to be banned from a forum; a genuine malevolant troll, or someone who's not taking shit on a particular issue?