News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Hello, I am a Christian Discordian

Started by imposter, June 07, 2007, 08:32:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 16
User actions

I Am Not A Rhombus

#135
October 09, 2007, 06:38:44 PM
Christian Discordianism; eh?

I've made a promotional poster for this new religion.

Cramulus

#136
October 09, 2007, 06:39:44 PM
 :lulz:, :mittens:

LMNO

#137
October 09, 2007, 06:44:50 PM
I am now officially glad we didn't run you off.

Triple Zero

#138
October 09, 2007, 06:51:55 PM
we're so easy to please ...
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

LMNO

#139
October 09, 2007, 06:56:08 PM
FUCK YOU!  MY MOM DIED BECAUSE SHE WAS EASY TO PLEASE!












...er... I don't think that came out right.

AFK

#140
October 09, 2007, 06:56:36 PM
needs moar bacon, and hoverin. 
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

Triple Zero

#141
October 09, 2007, 07:25:26 PM
Quote from: LMNO on October 09, 2007, 06:56:08 PM
...er... I don't think that came out right.

is that how she died, then?
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

AFK

#142
October 09, 2007, 07:28:35 PM
:rimshot:
Cynicism is a blank check for failure.

PopeTom

#143
October 09, 2007, 11:25:20 PM
Quote from: I Am Not A Rhombus on October 09, 2007, 05:24:25 PM
Quote from: PopeTom on June 07, 2007, 08:34:27 AM
Most major world religions are tequila, Discorianism is like beer.

Basically Discordianism is the religion you drink from once you have had your fill of the major religions of the world.



So Atheists are Tee Totalers; and Agnostics are so thoroughly pissed they can't tell whether there's a drink in front of them or not?

No, Atheists are also chasing the worm like anyone else who comments on theological matters.

I've on occasion said that I am a Discordian because it's the theological leaning that best compliments my Atheism.
-PopeTom

I am the result of 13.75 ± 0.13 billion years of random chance. Now that I exist I see no reason to start planning and organizing everything in my life.

Random dumb luck got me here, random dumb luck will get me to where I'm going.

Hail Eris!

PopeTom

#144
October 09, 2007, 11:29:17 PM
Quote from: triple zero on October 09, 2007, 06:00:42 PM
LMNOs point was that atheists are also religious.

or at least alcoholic.


I would not agree with the first statement, but I would agree with the second.
-PopeTom

I am the result of 13.75 ± 0.13 billion years of random chance. Now that I exist I see no reason to start planning and organizing everything in my life.

Random dumb luck got me here, random dumb luck will get me to where I'm going.

Hail Eris!

PopeTom

#145
October 09, 2007, 11:31:04 PM
Quote from: LMNO on October 09, 2007, 06:04:30 PM
A definitive and unshaking beleif that there is no God is just as religous as a definitive and unshaking belief that there is a God.

While there are Atheists who hold an unshakable belief that there is no God(s) Richard Dawkins is not one of them.

Have you read The God Delusion?  I need to get my copy back from Forest, but you are welcome to borrow it when I do.
-PopeTom

I am the result of 13.75 ± 0.13 billion years of random chance. Now that I exist I see no reason to start planning and organizing everything in my life.

Random dumb luck got me here, random dumb luck will get me to where I'm going.

Hail Eris!

Cain

#146
October 09, 2007, 11:44:53 PM
I can upload a pdf, for those who want it.

Purely so they can read before they decide to buy.

Triple Zero

#147
October 10, 2007, 02:41:36 AM
borrowed it from a friend last week, waiting until i get some time to read it.
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

Cramulus

#148
October 10, 2007, 08:25:26 PM

I Am Not A Rhombus

#149
October 11, 2007, 01:12:58 AM
Quote from: PopeTom on October 09, 2007, 11:31:04 PM
Quote from: LMNO on October 09, 2007, 06:04:30 PM
A definitive and unshaking beleif that there is no God is just as religous as a definitive and unshaking belief that there is a God.

While there are Atheists who hold an unshakable belief that there is no God(s) Richard Dawkins is not one of them.

Have you read The God Delusion?  I need to get my copy back from Forest, but you are welcome to borrow it when I do.


Yeah, people get the wrong idea about Dawkins. While I disagree with him on some things I still respect him for being outspoken. It's purely because he's outspoken that he gets thrown in the "Atheist loon" pile. I feel the same thing would have happened to Michael Moore regardless of the quality/accuracy of his movies. People are sickeningly apathetic and don't want to be told to care about things unless it can be presented to them in the most official and systematic way possible; which gives us a problem since some things can't be presented in that way at all; like say "Think for yourself". People just demonise the outspoken these days.

Honestly; who is more likely to be banned from a forum; a genuine malevolant troll, or someone who's not taking shit on a particular issue?
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 16
User actions