This thread is now about Furries, for some reason. Formerly: "So. Anonymous."

[trippinprincezz13]

I'm with Payne in all this.

Wow. Thanks.

I was beginning to lose hope that there were any people left who can actually think at all in here.

No, I'd actually have to agree with you. While I hold to the essence of what I said before, my bad mood is pouring over and making my posts a lot angrier. You put it a lot more neatly.

[Bebek Sincap Ratatosk]

Payne, Pent, Shadowfist, and Iptuousall of you seem to be using your brains... that's pretty good IMO

[P3nT4gR4m]

Basically what we have here is a bunch of "discordians" arguing against the right of a tiny minority to indulge in a "weird" practice for no other reason than it doesn't fit with their preconceived notions of what's right and proper and wholesome.

Careful with that conformity, thing it leads to very dark places indeed.

"So ya thought ya might like to go to the show.
To feel the warm thrill of confusion, that space cadet glow.
I got me some bad news for you, Sunshine.
Pink isn't well, he stayed back at the hotel,
And he sent us along as a surrogate band.
We're gonna find out where you fans really stand.
Are there any queers in the theatre tonight?
Get 'em up against the wall. -- 'Get them!
And that one in the spotlight, he don't look right to me.
Get him up against the wall. -- 'Get Them!
And that one looks Jewish, and that one's a coon.
Who let all this riffraff into the room?
There's one smoking a joint, and another with spots!
If I had my way I'd have all of ya shot. "

[Eve]

Conformity, on rare occasion, occurs because one particular thing actually just works better than the other options.

[fomenter]

Conformity, on rare occasion, occurs because one particular thing actually just works better than the other options.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Is that in response to everyone, because I don't see anything furry as tangibal, its an unreal excape of fantasy with no meaning, nothing to be too concerned about.
I would wager that peoples negativity comes from the characteristics of the people they have encountered describing themselves as furries, having some of the worst characteristics of other communities, say gamers (elietism), gays (persecution/ backbiting and eleitism amounst their own), shallow commercialist materialism.
and of course the more pathetic of members with the escapist hatred of their own bodies displacing their upset in the form of needing to feel like something other then a human, which gives way to the perverts(laughable pornography that looks like it was drawn by rob liefield), and of course the fringes; pedophilia and bestiality.

Yep, this.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Why aren't the bears hanging out in the rivers and streams jerking off with a fish on it's dick?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

impossibility of consent?
what about when the retarded person is the initiator?
or even when the retarded person is the 'giver' rather than the receiver?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

impossibility of consent?
what about when the child is the initiator?
or even when the child is the 'giver' rather than the receiver?

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

It's degrees of scale. When a human strokes a cat they are using the animal in a way that nature never intended. Or what about using a sheepdog to herd sheep?

We use animals all the time, for our own personal amusement but it's considered morally acceptable if we look after them and feed them and shit and don't cause them distress. Shagging them, however, is a big taboo. Even if the conditions you shag them in conform to acceptable standards of animal husbandry.

From a purely objective point of view, that may be true.

I draw my line in the sand far before that though.

Shagging animals is wrong, but as I've been trying to say, it's the self-deluding justifications for it that I find  distasteful, not the act in and of itself.

I am completely with Payne on this one. Shagging animals is not disgusting, but people who shag animals are.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

Well I have the same sexual hangup... I sure as hell don't want to fuck animals. However, I don't think it's a cut and dried people who 'can actually think' kind of issue.

DUDE.

I think that what he was getting at is people's fucking retarded inability to follow the logic he was presenting without interjecting and then arguing with a bunch of crap HE WASN'T SAYING. It was getting really annoying to me, too.

Seriously, people, THINK about the words he's using, and try responding to THOSE WORDS.

[P3nT4gR4m]

It's degrees of scale. When a human strokes a cat they are using the animal in a way that nature never intended. Or what about using a sheepdog to herd sheep?

We use animals all the time, for our own personal amusement but it's considered morally acceptable if we look after them and feed them and shit and don't cause them distress. Shagging them, however, is a big taboo. Even if the conditions you shag them in conform to acceptable standards of animal husbandry.

From a purely objective point of view, that may be true.

I draw my line in the sand far before that though.

Shagging animals is wrong, but as I've been trying to say, it's the self-deluding justifications for it that I find  distasteful, not the act in and of itself.

I am completely with Payne on this one. Shagging animals is not disgusting, but people who shag animals are.

Okay lets follow this one then.

How about a list of people who disgust you? If everyone jots down their own personal gross-outs I'll get the gas chambers ready.

[Dysfunctional Cunt]

It's degrees of scale. When a human strokes a cat they are using the animal in a way that nature never intended. Or what about using a sheepdog to herd sheep?

We use animals all the time, for our own personal amusement but it's considered morally acceptable if we look after them and feed them and shit and don't cause them distress. Shagging them, however, is a big taboo. Even if the conditions you shag them in conform to acceptable standards of animal husbandry.

From a purely objective point of view, that may be true.

I draw my line in the sand far before that though.

Shagging animals is wrong, but as I've been trying to say, it's the self-deluding justifications for it that I find  distasteful, not the act in and of itself.

I am completely with Payne on this one. Shagging animals is not disgusting, but people who shag animals are.

Okay lets follow this one then.

How about a list of people who disgust you? If everyone jots down their own personal gross-outs I'll get the gas chambers ready.

George W Bush



















WHAT?  You're just mad I beat you to it!!!!!

[P3nT4gR4m]

Actually you just shot my whole argument to shit. Fuck it. Here's mine.

Cat owners
Fat people
People with annoying accents
Anyone who didn't see the first metallica tour in person.

[Mesozoic Mister Nigel]

It's degrees of scale. When a human strokes a cat they are using the animal in a way that nature never intended. Or what about using a sheepdog to herd sheep?

We use animals all the time, for our own personal amusement but it's considered morally acceptable if we look after them and feed them and shit and don't cause them distress. Shagging them, however, is a big taboo. Even if the conditions you shag them in conform to acceptable standards of animal husbandry.

From a purely objective point of view, that may be true.

I draw my line in the sand far before that though.

Shagging animals is wrong, but as I've been trying to say, it's the self-deluding justifications for it that I find  distasteful, not the act in and of itself.

I am completely with Payne on this one. Shagging animals is not disgusting, but people who shag animals are.

Okay lets follow this one then.

How about a list of people who disgust you? If everyone jots down their own personal gross-outs I'll get the gas chambers ready.

You are confusing my right to hate with a desire to impose my hate on other people's lifestyles.