It's mah birfday...

[Sir Squid Diddimus]

[Roaring Biscuit!]

just like an armful of docile photoshopped kittens.

[Sir Squid Diddimus]

i love photoshopped kittens

[Payne]

i love photoshopped kittens. and biting faces.
                    \

[Bu🤠ns]

What the hell is happening to this forum? 

PN banned all of us and we're bored.

[Sir Squid Diddimus]

i love photoshopped kittens. and biting faces.
                    \

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I can fix that.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vp-is6S_b_g&feature=rec-HM-fresh+div

[the last yatto]

.0002 cents

[Dimocritus]

I told you, I can't (and won't) control or censor the contributors of my site, so if you want to go on a tirade find the guy who posted that and get emotional with him. Welcome to the internet, things may get offensive. Now that that's done, it is also nice to meet you.

And if a contributor advocates for a change in law with regards abolishing the age of consent while making it clear that they don't respect that law in their personal life?

You can play the "free speech" and "internet" cards if you wish, but if you don't make your personal stand clear than people will assume the worst from whom you choose to associate with.

You're also not going to allow something to be published which is going to get you in trouble with National Security services, because shits'n'giggles isn't worth it, and I can repost something from wikileaks if you want to test that theory.

You have a line that you will draw, so where is that line?

I may not have a sane, sound mind at this point, (I had recently lost my marbles, and I came here to find them. Maybe I made a mistake) and my personal viewpoint is admittedly skewed at this point in my life (see: I lost my marbles) but free speech is not something I am willing to draw a line through (I suppose I could live without the internets). So, if you want a stand to be made, my first official stance here at PD.com is for the freedom of speech (I will not use the term "first amendment" because I don't beleive that I need a constitution to allow me natural rights), and the thing with freedom of speech, that I'm sure you can all understand, is that sometimes (most of the time) people will say things that you don't like, but it's your freedom (as you have exercised) to say something about what they're saying. There's a lot of people saying a lot of things here at PD.com (and the rest of the world) that I don't necessarily like for one reason or another, but if that's what they want to say, I must let them, or else be a huge hypocrite (I would rather be a prick douche-bag than a hypocrite). Now that that's over with, I didn't paint that billboard or take that picture or post it in the internet, so I would much rather be spending my time defending something that I, myself wrote. If anyone has anything to say about that, then please continue.

[BADGE OF HONOR]

With great power come great responsibility.

[Captain Utopia]

It was a simple question (You have a line that you will draw, so where is that line?) - if you don't want to answer it, you can just come out and say so.

All that I can gather from your response is that you believe in free speech, but that would lead me to conclude that you would allow the publication of child porn, or borderline child porn.

To be blunt, I don't believe you.

[Dimocritus]

It was a simple question (You have a line that you will draw, so where is that line?) - if you don't want to answer it, you can just come out and say so.

All that I can gather from your response is that you believe in free speech, but that would lead me to conclude that you would allow the publication of child porn, or borderline child porn.

To be blunt, I don't believe you.

I don't beleive me either. I told you, I've lost it... why get in-depth with a gibbering lunatic... I beleive nothing...

[Captain Utopia]

It was a simple question (You have a line that you will draw, so where is that line?) - if you don't want to answer it, you can just come out and say so.

All that I can gather from your response is that you believe in free speech, but that would lead me to conclude that you would allow the publication of child porn, or borderline child porn.

To be blunt, I don't believe you.

I don't beleive me either. I told you, I've lost it... why get in-depth with a gibbering lunatic... I beleive nothing...

The downside to not playing with a full deck is that you run out of cards all the quicker.

You've played the "free speech" and "internet" and "i'm soo crazy" cards, and they've all been out-played. I want to get in-depth with you, and I want to see what answer you have for the question. You came here to be challenged, didn't you?

[Roaring Biscuit!]

It was a simple question (You have a line that you will draw, so where is that line?) - if you don't want to answer it, you can just come out and say so.

All that I can gather from your response is that you believe in free speech, but that would lead me to conclude that you would allow the publication of child porn, or borderline child porn.

To be blunt, I don't believe you.

I don't beleive me either. I told you, I've lost it... why get in-depth with a gibbering lunatic... I beleive nothing...

The downside to not playing with a full deck is that you run out of cards all the quicker.

You've played the "free speech" and "internet" and "i'm soo crazy" cards, and they've all been out-played. I want to get in-depth with you, and I want to see what answer you have for the question. You came here to be challenged, didn't you?

you make it sound like you think its wrong for him to have discordant beliefs.  Yeh, see how i used discordant on purpose?  I could have said contradictory, but then I might have had to spend longer making my point.

x

[Sir Squid Diddimus]

   Man, I hate it when people play the crazy card.

Seems like such a cop out.