News:

TESTEMONAIL:  Right and Discordianism allows room for personal interpretation. You have your theories and I have mine. Unlike Christianity, Discordia allows room for ideas and opinions, and mine is well-informed and based on ancient philosophy and theology, so, my neo-Discordian friends, open your minds to my interpretation and I will open my mind to yours. That's fair enough, right? Just claiming to be discordian should mean that your mind is open and willing to learn and share ideas. You guys are fucking bashing me and your laughing at my theologies and my friends know what's up and are laughing at you and honestly this is my last shot at putting a label on my belief structure and your making me lose all hope of ever finding a ideological group I can relate to because you don't even know what the fuck I'm talking about and everything I have said is based on the founding principals of real Discordianism. Expand your mind.

Main Menu

Scientific Monastics?

Started by Kai, October 12, 2009, 05:46:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Template

I think someone here wants an out.  Maybe me.  Here goes:
When I think healthy but expendable, I think military.  If we can get away with restructuring medical research, maybe we can work different facets of "risk your life for the greater good", ie soldiering.  maybe.

So, should a general model that monasticises all scientific research exist?

LMNO

Quote from: Kai on October 14, 2009, 12:10:23 AM
Quote from: Requia ☣ on October 14, 2009, 12:00:37 AM
For the same reason its ethically OK to give somebody who is sick a medication that has nasty side effects, but not somebody who is healthy.

Explain to me how that's ethically okay.


Well, let's say you were trying to find a cure for AIDS, post-infection.

There is an implication that someone in the monestary would have to infect themselves with HIV in order to see if it works or not.

Ethically, it seems better to find people who are already infected, rather than add to the sum total of HIV+ cases in the world.


The point being that in order to test if something will cure a disease, you need to have someone with that disease in the first place.  You can't test it on someone who's not sick.

Cain

Quote from: Igor on October 13, 2009, 12:00:01 PM
Neal Stephenson's latest book Anathem goes into this idea veeery thoroughly. It also has the "was maths invented/discovered" thing, and parallel universes and ninjas and space aliens....

It's a long read but definitely worth checking out.

I still haven't read that.  I really should.

LMNO


Cain

I don't think so, but I have it in html anyway.  I could probably convert it to pdf quite easily, though I know he sometimes likes to put graphics in his books and I don't know if they will copy over with everything else. 

Time to run some tests.

LMNO

Try Stanza, it's a good free conversion tool.

Cain


LMNO

Well, I think I know what I'm reading next.

Cramulus

related to topic:

Cory Doctorow's story "The Things That Make Me Weak and Strange Get Engineered Away"
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/08/06/the-things-that-make.html

"about geek monasteries that house smart people who can't get along in the world and put them to work as coders. "





I found this story very enjoyable

LMNO

Quote from: Cain on October 14, 2009, 03:25:52 PM
Quote from: Igor on October 13, 2009, 12:00:01 PM
Neal Stephenson's latest book Anathem goes into this idea veeery thoroughly. It also has the "was maths invented/discovered" thing, and parallel universes and ninjas and space aliens....

It's a long read but definitely worth checking out.

I still haven't read that.  I really should.

So far, it's pretty good.  I thought the new language/terminologies would be annoying, but he actually put some thought into it.