News:

I just don't understand any kind of absolute egalitarianism philosophy. Whether it's branded as anarcho-capitalism or straight anarchism or sockfucking libertarianism, it always misses the same point.

Main Menu

Ft. hOOd

Started by KopyKat253, November 06, 2009, 12:03:05 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

What do you think is likely?

They want us to think it was extremism
3 (21.4%)
It actualy is extremism
3 (21.4%)
It's the same people that were after Lord Omar.
4 (28.6%)
Its all obamas fault.
2 (14.3%)
It was just a bad acid trip!
2 (14.3%)

Total Members Voted: 14

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Kai on November 11, 2009, 07:09:59 PM
Quoteall humans are irrational

But amusing when they do it in large groups.   :)
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Bebek Sincap Ratatosk

Quote from: Kai on November 11, 2009, 07:09:59 PM
Quoteall humans are irrational
Wait, are you calling me a human?!  :argh!:


:wink:
- I don't see race. I just see cars going around in a circle.

"Back in my day, crazy meant something. Now everyone is crazy" - Charlie Manson

Cain

Quote from: Kai on November 11, 2009, 01:36:48 AM
I was listening to NPR today while returning from my collecting trip

On certain well known liberal blogs, NPR has been referred to as "even liberal NPR" for about two years now, due to to its willingness to treat nutjob talking points from the far-right with the same merit as more nuanced and considered positions.

The Good Reverend Roger

Quote from: Cain on November 11, 2009, 07:50:35 PM
Quote from: Kai on November 11, 2009, 01:36:48 AM
I was listening to NPR today while returning from my collecting trip

On certain well known liberal blogs, NPR has been referred to as "even liberal NPR" for about two years now, due to to its willingness to treat nutjob talking points from the far-right with the same merit as more nuanced and considered positions.

This.  When Memnoch at MW started quoting NPR, I stopped taking it seriously.
" It's just that Depeche Mode were a bunch of optimistic loveburgers."
- TGRR, shaming himself forever, 7/8/2017

"Billy, when I say that ethics is our number one priority and safety is also our number one priority, you should take that to mean exactly what I said. Also quality. That's our number one priority as well. Don't look at me that way, you're in the corporate world now and this is how it works."
- TGRR, raising the bar at work.

Cain

Quote from: Squid on November 11, 2009, 04:27:14 PM
slap me if someone already said this- but isn't it NOT terrorism if it's against our military?
it has to be against civilians, right?

Depends.  Most US commentators with legal expertise say it's not, and I would agree with the conclusion, if not with the reasoning behind it (their reasoning is that soldiers cannot be victims of terrorism because they're soldiers, my viewpoint is that they're not victims of terrorism because they were the intended targets - there was no third target who the shooter was trying to intimidate by killing the soldiers).

IMO, soldiers not on front line duty can be victims of terrorism as much as anyone else, if the attack is done with intent to threaten a third party.

Cain

Quote from: LMNO on November 11, 2009, 05:47:26 PM
So, during the Oklahoma City Bombing, did anyone suddenly consider that the Christians were attacking the country?

As I recall, Fox News blamed Arabs.

Charlie Gibson still believes the Iraqi intelligence services were behind it (there is a less crazy version of this conspiracy theory, but it is not very interesting).

Cain

Quote from: The Good Reverend Roger on November 11, 2009, 07:53:36 PM
Quote from: Cain on November 11, 2009, 07:50:35 PM
Quote from: Kai on November 11, 2009, 01:36:48 AM
I was listening to NPR today while returning from my collecting trip

On certain well known liberal blogs, NPR has been referred to as "even liberal NPR" for about two years now, due to to its willingness to treat nutjob talking points from the far-right with the same merit as more nuanced and considered positions.

This.  When Memnoch at MW started quoting NPR, I stopped taking it seriously.

I still remember when he quoted Michelle Malkin.  That was seriously funny.

Bebek Sincap Ratatosk

Quote from: Cain on November 11, 2009, 07:56:43 PM
Quote from: Squid on November 11, 2009, 04:27:14 PM
slap me if someone already said this- but isn't it NOT terrorism if it's against our military?
it has to be against civilians, right?

Depends.  Most US commentators with legal expertise say it's not, and I would agree with the conclusion, if not with the reasoning behind it (their reasoning is that soldiers cannot be victims of terrorism because they're soldiers, my viewpoint is that they're not victims of terrorism because they were the intended targets - there was no third target who the shooter was trying to intimidate by killing the soldiers).

IMO, soldiers not on front line duty can be victims of terrorism as much as anyone else, if the attack is done with intent to threaten a third party.

THIS.

I don't think we'll know until Hasan tells people why he did what he did. If he just decided to kill people, its not terrorism... but if he was trying to influence the stance on Afghanistan/Iraq or if he was hoping to scare people from joining the military or if he was hoping to scare the average American because "OMGZ IT COULD HAPPEN RIGHT HERE!!!" then it might be terrorism.
- I don't see race. I just see cars going around in a circle.

"Back in my day, crazy meant something. Now everyone is crazy" - Charlie Manson

Cain

The evidence leans towards it being more an incident of mass murder than anything else, at the moment (the psychology of a mass murderer does differ significantly from that of a terrorist, despite terrorism often involving mass murder, so the distinction is a valid one).

I'd like to know exactly who he targeted, and his relationships with them.  That would provide a ton of insight into his motivations.  Also the events of that day and the day before would be necessary.  And the level of planning, too. 

Dysfunctional Cunt

It is the military people.  You can't have crazy people in the military.  They have all those tests and such to make sure there aren't any crazy people in the military.  Hell they have a special discharge for crazy people.   

So now, they've let a crazy person in....  and worse...... OMG..... gotten caught with their psychological pants down...

OH NOES what excuse can we come up with for his insane act?  Oh yes...... He's a terrorist.....  Then everyone gets all scared and shit.

This fucking idiot went postal for whatever reason.  Only you can't call it that when you are the one who gave him the fucking gun!



Cain

Quote from: Khara on November 11, 2009, 08:28:47 PM
You can't have crazy people in the military.

Has anyone told the military this?

Bebek Sincap Ratatosk

Quote from: Khara on November 11, 2009, 08:28:47 PM
It is the military people.  You can't have crazy people in the military.  They have all those tests and such to make sure there aren't any crazy people in the military.  Hell they have a special discharge for crazy people.   

So now, they've let a crazy person in....  and worse...... OMG..... gotten caught with their psychological pants down...

OH NOES what excuse can we come up with for his insane act?  Oh yes...... He's a terrorist.....  Then everyone gets all scared and shit.

This fucking idiot went postal for whatever reason.  Only you can't call it that when you are the one who gave him the fucking gun!




I don't think those were military issue guns...

but the point remains, he could just be a guy gone postal and the military is trying to pass it off as terrorism. I hadn't considered that angle yet.
- I don't see race. I just see cars going around in a circle.

"Back in my day, crazy meant something. Now everyone is crazy" - Charlie Manson

fomenter

Quote from: Khara on November 11, 2009, 08:28:47 PM
It is the military people.  You can't have crazy people in the military.  They have all those tests and such to make sure there aren't any crazy people in the military.  Hell they have a special discharge for crazy people.   

So now, they've let a crazy person in....  and worse...... OMG..... gotten caught with their psychological pants down...

OH NOES what excuse can we come up with for his insane act?  Oh yes...... He's a terrorist.....  Then everyone gets all scared and shit.

This fucking idiot went postal for whatever reason.  Only you can't call it that when you are the one who gave him the fucking gun!



i think he was a psychiatrist, the crazy person in charge of helping the army deal with solders going crazy went crazy   :omg: :omg:
"So she says to me, do you wanna be a BAD boy? And I say YEAH baby YEAH! Surf's up space ponies! I'm makin' gravy... Without the lumps. HAAA-ha-ha-ha!"


hmroogp

Elder Iptuous

Quote from: Doctor Rat Bastard on November 11, 2009, 08:35:32 PM
I don't think those were military issue guns...

No. he used an FN 5.7, which i saw described in one news article as "a favorite of the Mexican Drug Cartels", and in another as, "a favorite of SWAT teams", and in yet another as a "Cop Killer" gun.....  :roll:
It's also a favorite of harmless mall ninjas.  I use mine for killing paper.

he also used a S&W .357 revolver, but that's not as dramatic...

fomenter

 :lulz: i heard some of those descriptions as well, i hate when they do that  :argh!:
"So she says to me, do you wanna be a BAD boy? And I say YEAH baby YEAH! Surf's up space ponies! I'm makin' gravy... Without the lumps. HAAA-ha-ha-ha!"


hmroogp