News:

I live in the Promised Land, except the Chosen People are all trying to get out. 

Main Menu

Holder vs Humanitarian law and Arar vs Ashcroft both pass in Govt favour

Started by Cain, June 24, 2010, 07:18:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Cain

The problem with private military companies is you normally have to work either for actual militaries for a while, or at the very least in the most militarized aspects of the police state (SWAT etc) for at least five years.  That's the trusted industry standard.  Anyone who has worked less is usually considered to be much more dubious, and so normally wont win contracts.  Assuming other companies are not in fact already intelligence fronts or run by state intelligence assets, as we know several are.

Also mercenaries are just as exposed to the visscitudes of state power as anyone else.  Google "the conspiracy of La Magione" for an historical example.  Now, most leaders, at least in the Western world, are nowhere near as clever or ambitious as Cesare Borgia, but they can usually afford to hire someone who is.

LMNO

Quote from: Doktor Howl on June 24, 2010, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: Zyzyx on June 24, 2010, 04:20:17 PM
Reading the Wiki article now. Sounds like a bunch of "whoopsies" on the part of the government that led to the ruining of a life that just wanted to be left alone.

It makes one wonder: how /does/ one do it right? Because it seems like the feds fucked with this guy until they finally had a chance to shoot him.

"Whoopsies".   :lulz:

He went square.  They pounded a round hole into him.  Several times.

That's usually fatal.

Fixed.

Doktor Howl

Quote from: LMNO on June 24, 2010, 04:23:56 PM
Quote from: Doktor Howl on June 24, 2010, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: Zyzyx on June 24, 2010, 04:20:17 PM
Reading the Wiki article now. Sounds like a bunch of "whoopsies" on the part of the government that led to the ruining of a life that just wanted to be left alone.

It makes one wonder: how /does/ one do it right? Because it seems like the feds fucked with this guy until they finally had a chance to shoot him.

"Whoopsies".   :lulz:

He went square.  They pounded a round hole into him.  Several times.

That's usually fatal.

Fixed.

Either way. :lol:
Molon Lube

Zyzyx

That's why I would seal myself off, like in a Vault from the Fallout series. A Vault (minus the gerbil-esque social experiments) would be pretty much perfect.

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Zyzyx on June 24, 2010, 04:27:08 PM
That's why I would seal myself off, like in a Vault from the Fallout series.

And that's precisely why they'd go after you.
Molon Lube

Cain

Quote from: Zyzyx on June 24, 2010, 04:27:08 PM
That's why I would seal myself off, like in a Vault from the Fallout series. A Vault (minus the gerbil-esque social experiments) would be pretty much perfect.

Would this vault have access to air?

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Cain on June 24, 2010, 04:30:37 PM
Quote from: Zyzyx on June 24, 2010, 04:27:08 PM
That's why I would seal myself off, like in a Vault from the Fallout series. A Vault (minus the gerbil-esque social experiments) would be pretty much perfect.

Would this vault have access to air?

Also, food.  Then there's the actual construction of it.  Why are there so few mad scientists plotting to take over the world?  Oh, yeah...Because those secret bases are EXPENSIVE.
Molon Lube

Cain

Well, if it had no access to air, it would be perfectly safe, just not useful for very long.  On the other hand, if it did, then it'd be time to drop the airborne weapons we sold to Saddam but totally don't build anymore, no siree.

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Cain on June 24, 2010, 04:35:14 PM
Well, if it had no access to air, it would be perfectly safe, just not useful for very long.  On the other hand, if it did, then it'd be time to drop the airborne weapons we sold to Saddam but totally don't build anymore, no siree.

And if there's filters, just pour a few tanker trucks of gasoline down the intakes, and let nature do its thing.
Molon Lube

Zyzyx

But why? Excuse my naivete, but is it so wrong to just want to be left alone?

Cain

Quote from: Zyzyx on June 24, 2010, 04:46:53 PM
But why? Excuse my naivete, but is it so wrong to just want to be left alone?

Because.  People who can be self-sufficient are dangerous, since all power is ultimately based on, aside from coercion, the provision (and threat of removal) of services, and people who want to be "left alone" are living outside of the Officially Approved Ideological State Structure and thus present a valid, and potentially attractive alternative to existence in Fat City.  Without people to tax and services to provide, the state can only rely on its coercive powers which, as we have seen lately, are not as fantastic as they'd like you to believe (though they'd still squash the unprepared or lone individual like a bug).

Zyzyx

The system is just insidious. The futility of it all is just staggering. They hide behind well-meaning people to get their agenda across.

LMNO


Zyzyx

Quote from: LMNO on June 24, 2010, 04:57:11 PM
Zyz is starting to catch on...

Well, I /did/ sip the RAW kool-aid enough to paraphrase what he said in book two of Illuminatus!: "No matter who is running the machine, it will always turn out the exact same product." Essentially, we can have a million Mother Theresas running the US Federal government and the structure will produce the same damn thing as if it were run by a million Hermann Goerings.

My deceased grandfather was right. "The state has become more fascist (in 2006) than I've ever seen in my life (of 77 years)."

Doktor Howl

Quote from: Zyzyx on June 24, 2010, 04:46:53 PM
But why? Excuse my naivete, but is it so wrong to just want to be left alone?

Ever run from a dog?
Molon Lube