News:

PD.Com: Pretention in a can.

Main Menu

An Open Apology

Started by Dysfunctional Cunt, February 15, 2011, 08:51:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

navkat

Why do I get the feeling my ass is going to be WOMPd at some point?

Heh.

Come WOMP that ass.

LMNO

Were it not for wedding vows, I would make that ass my playground.

Phox

Quote from: LMNO, PhD on February 20, 2011, 01:43:01 AM
Were it not for wedding vows, I would make that ass my playground.
Fortunately, I am under no such constraints. I say again:  :fap:

Telarus

Telarus, KSC,
.__.  Keeper of the Contradictory Cephalopod, Zenarchist Swordsman,
(0o)  Tender to the Edible Zen Garden, Ratcheting Metallic Sex Doll of The End Times,
/||\   Episkopos of the Amorphous Dreams Cabal

Join the Doll Underground! Experience the Phantasmagorical Safari!

navkat

Tee-hee!

Silly boys (and girls), it's just a couple of bewbz fo my butt!  :)

Triple Zero

Quote from: Charley Brown on February 17, 2011, 08:13:04 PM
Have all of you fuckers been cheating with having shit open all this time? I never even thought about having wiki or anything else open.


I feel stupid now.

WTF!!? That's not cheating, that's being POLITE :|

holy shit Charley seriously?? you're not in a one-on-one discussion, but on an INTERNET FORUM, which are one-to-many.

normally in a one-on-one talk, some people might consider fact-checking and peeking in an encyclopedia to see if you're right before opening your mouth as "cheating" (at least, I can imagine some might).

In a one-to-many discussion, NOT making a reasonable effort to fact-check what you say is even correct (which might include using wikipedia or google), is considered WASTING EVERYBODY'S FUCKING TIME.

why?

Well, if you fact-check before you post, it costs you, what? Say 30 seconds to five minutes of your time. Divide that by the size of your audience (say, 50 unique people on PD?), and I'd say that's definitely worth the effort.

Now consider if you just write down whatever you think is right or are not entirely sure but post it anyway without "cheating"/fact-checking. Now the audience has to fact-check for themselves. Congratulations, you just caused others 50 times the effort you would have otherwise spent yourself.

That is why fact-checking before you post is not considered "cheating", but common fucking courtesy.

If you think I'm being condescending now, think again, because I'm not, I'm pissed off. This is not something new or computer/internet related, you also don't need to be smart in order to do it, just not lazy. If somebody is giving a speech IRL to a 50+ audience, you'd expect him to checked his facts before opening his mouth right? You'd be pissed off if you'd find out later he'd been talking to a big audience without at least spending a bit of effort to check what he said is even correct, right?

This is the sort of shit that we slap people on Wicca forums around for. We're supposed to be BETTER than that, not because anybody is really much SMARTER or more educated or whatever (giving Dead Kennedy the benefit of the doubt shows just smartness gets you nowhere), but because if there's one thing we can all sort of agree about in this little island of Discord, it is that using your brain to THINK is a GOOD THING.

BTW one kind of fact-checking that is actually even less effort than using google or wikipedia, is to check the fucking DATE on an article before you link to it. Yet another one of those tiny common courtesy thingies that, you know, would cost you like 5 seconds before posting to prevent 50+ people wasting an enormous amount of time (taking the article seriously, getting upset about it, checking the date, finding out it's more than 5 years old, slapping their foreheads, trying to come up with a nice way to mention this, etc etc).



I'm trying to think. It's not very nice what I wrote here. But honestly, unless I completely misunderstand what you're saying here, I have all the right to be pissed off. Thanks for letting me know though. And if you'd say "hmm good point, never considered that, will try in the future" then we're fine.

Finally, before anyone tries the easy bullshit argument "but YOU don't fact-check always either before you post!!", well that's maybe right. Sometimes (rarely) I don't, but I know I SHOULD. Charley just said because of some warped concept of intellectual honesty, he considers it cheating. I consider it "not wasting other people's time, if I can help it".

You wouldn't believe the amount of junk in my "unposted-posts.txt" I never posted because I didn't get around to wrapping it up.

PEACE
Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

Adios

Quote from: Triple Zero on February 20, 2011, 05:24:31 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on February 17, 2011, 08:13:04 PM
Have all of you fuckers been cheating with having shit open all this time? I never even thought about having wiki or anything else open.


I feel stupid now.

WTF!!? That's not cheating, that's being POLITE :|

holy shit Charley seriously?? you're not in a one-on-one discussion, but on an INTERNET FORUM, which are one-to-many.

normally in a one-on-one talk, some people might consider fact-checking and peeking in an encyclopedia to see if you're right before opening your mouth as "cheating" (at least, I can imagine some might).

In a one-to-many discussion, NOT making a reasonable effort to fact-check what you say is even correct (which might include using wikipedia or google), is considered WASTING EVERYBODY'S FUCKING TIME.

why?

Well, if you fact-check before you post, it costs you, what? Say 30 seconds to five minutes of your time. Divide that by the size of your audience (say, 50 unique people on PD?), and I'd say that's definitely worth the effort.

Now consider if you just write down whatever you think is right or are not entirely sure but post it anyway without "cheating"/fact-checking. Now the audience has to fact-check for themselves. Congratulations, you just caused others 50 times the effort you would have otherwise spent yourself.

That is why fact-checking before you post is not considered "cheating", but common fucking courtesy.

If you think I'm being condescending now, think again, because I'm not, I'm pissed off. This is not something new or computer/internet related, you also don't need to be smart in order to do it, just not lazy. If somebody is giving a speech IRL to a 50+ audience, you'd expect him to checked his facts before opening his mouth right? You'd be pissed off if you'd find out later he'd been talking to a big audience without at least spending a bit of effort to check what he said is even correct, right?

This is the sort of shit that we slap people on Wicca forums around for. We're supposed to be BETTER than that, not because anybody is really much SMARTER or more educated or whatever (giving Dead Kennedy the benefit of the doubt shows just smartness gets you nowhere), but because if there's one thing we can all sort of agree about in this little island of Discord, it is that using your brain to THINK is a GOOD THING.

BTW one kind of fact-checking that is actually even less effort than using google or wikipedia, is to check the fucking DATE on an article before you link to it. Yet another one of those tiny common courtesy thingies that, you know, would cost you like 5 seconds before posting to prevent 50+ people wasting an enormous amount of time (taking the article seriously, getting upset about it, checking the date, finding out it's more than 5 years old, slapping their foreheads, trying to come up with a nice way to mention this, etc etc).



I'm trying to think. It's not very nice what I wrote here. But honestly, unless I completely misunderstand what you're saying here, I have all the right to be pissed off. Thanks for letting me know though. And if you'd say "hmm good point, never considered that, will try in the future" then we're fine.

Finally, before anyone tries the easy bullshit argument "but YOU don't fact-check always either before you post!!", well that's maybe right. Sometimes (rarely) I don't, but I know I SHOULD. Charley just said because of some warped concept of intellectual honesty, he considers it cheating. I consider it "not wasting other people's time, if I can help it".

You wouldn't believe the amount of junk in my "unposted-posts.txt" I never posted because I didn't get around to wrapping it up.

PEACE

Get the fuck off my ass and learn to take a fucking joke. Or don't.

Triple Zero

Quote from: Charley Brown on February 20, 2011, 05:29:03 PM
Get the fuck off my ass

Why? you never seem to have a problem jumping on people's ass, regardless of whether you even know what you're fucking talking about?

I'm done being polite. It's obvious that you're just interested in using this forum as a one-way conversation. Also perfectly explains why your stories are brilliant (I mean that) but whenever you (try to) take part in a discussion it's just one UNNNNNG after a facepalm after another.

Quoteand learn to take a fucking joke. Or don't.

What was the joke part?

I seriously don't understand. I clearly remember, you were rambling something about the dangers of RFID, I ask about it, you post quotes from articles, and waste everybody's time, because when I check it your sources are over 5 years old ... :| when I point this out to you, and in addition explain where the current state of the art of RFID is at, you get all childish and irritated that I'm being condescending at YOU. I shut up at that moment, but you can be fucking sure I was pissed on the inside for first wasting my time with some dated bullshit and then even having the gall telling me off over it when I correct you.

And then pretty much exactly the same thing happened AGAIN,

and a while later AGAIN,

and then I read this thread.

And suddenly it all becomes clear to me. You're not dumb. You just don't care about having a discussion. You just want to dump your ideas on board, who the heck cares where they land, if they even make sense or check out, and woe to the person that tries to question it.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with that attitude. As long as you're writing an autobiography.

Ex-Soviet Bloc Sexual Attack Swede of Tomorrow™
e-prime disclaimer: let it seem fairly unclear I understand the apparent subjectivity of the above statements. maybe.

INFORMATION SO POWERFUL, YOU ACTUALLY NEED LESS.

Adios

Quote from: Triple Zero on February 20, 2011, 05:44:36 PM
Quote from: Charley Brown on February 20, 2011, 05:29:03 PM
Get the fuck off my ass

Why? you never seem to have a problem jumping on people's ass, regardless of whether you even know what you're fucking talking about?

I'm done being polite. It's obvious that you're just interested in using this forum as a one-way conversation. Also perfectly explains why your stories are brilliant (I mean that) but whenever you (try to) take part in a discussion it's just one UNNNNNG after a facepalm after another.

Quoteand learn to take a fucking joke. Or don't.

What was the joke part?

I seriously don't understand. I clearly remember, you were rambling something about the dangers of RFID, I ask about it, you post quotes from articles, and waste everybody's time, because when I check it your sources are over 5 years old ... :| when I point this out to you, and in addition explain where the current state of the art of RFID is at, you get all childish and irritated that I'm being condescending at YOU. I shut up at that moment, but you can be fucking sure I was pissed on the inside for first wasting my time with some dated bullshit and then even having the gall telling me off over it when I correct you.

And then pretty much exactly the same thing happened AGAIN,

and a while later AGAIN,

and then I read this thread.

And suddenly it all becomes clear to me. You're not dumb. You just don't care about having a discussion. You just want to dump your ideas on board, who the heck cares where they land, if they even make sense or check out, and woe to the person that tries to question it.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with that attitude. As long as you're writing an autobiography.



Have you ever considered just not reading any of my posts? As badly as this may bruise your apparently massive ego, I have no compulsion nor desire to explain my thought process or my posting style to you. Have fun with your rage.

Don Coyote

Going back to me watching porn while browsing PD, I don't have wikipedia open most of the time while browsing PD and when I do, it's usually for something related to another forum I am reading at the same time.

Phox

Quote from: Canis latrans eques on February 20, 2011, 07:07:41 PM
Going back to me watching porn while browsing PD, I don't have wikipedia open most of the time while browsing PD and when I do, it's usually for something related to another forum I am reading at the same time.

Anal penetration or GTFO.

Don Coyote

Quote from: Doktor Phox on February 20, 2011, 07:37:09 PM
Quote from: Canis latrans eques on February 20, 2011, 07:07:41 PM
Going back to me watching porn while browsing PD, I don't have wikipedia open most of the time while browsing PD and when I do, it's usually for something related to another forum I am reading at the same time.

Anal penetration or GTFO.

Leave your name, number and 8 digit grid coordinate and a service representative will be with you shortly to violate your orifices.

Phox

Quote from: Canis latrans eques on February 20, 2011, 08:03:19 PM
Quote from: Doktor Phox on February 20, 2011, 07:37:09 PM
Quote from: Canis latrans eques on February 20, 2011, 07:07:41 PM
Going back to me watching porn while browsing PD, I don't have wikipedia open most of the time while browsing PD and when I do, it's usually for something related to another forum I am reading at the same time.

Anal penetration or GTFO.

Leave your name, number and 8 digit grid coordinate and a service representative will be with you shortly to violate your orifices.
:lol: :1fap:

Prince Glittersnatch III

Quote from: Canis latrans eques on February 20, 2011, 07:07:41 PM
Going back to me watching porn while browsing PD, I don't have wikipedia open most of the time while browsing PD and when I do, it's usually for something related to another forum I am reading at the same time.

BUT WHAT KIND OF PORN IS IT?

I DEMAND LINKS

:argh!:
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?=743264506 <---worst human being to ever live.

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Other%20Pagan%20Mumbo-Jumbo/discordianism.htm <----Learn the truth behind Discordianism

Quote from: Aleister Growly on September 04, 2010, 04:08:37 AM
Glittersnatch would be a rather unfortunate condition, if a halfway decent troll name.

Quote from: GIGGLES on June 16, 2011, 10:24:05 PM
AORTAL SEX MADES MY DICK HARD AS FUCK!

Cardinal Pizza Deliverance.

The picture of navkat's ass makes sense if you actually read the thread. Who knew? I have learned something today. :D With proper context, even asses make sense.
Weevil-Infested Badfun Wrongsex Referee From The 9th Earth
Slick and Deranged Wombat of Manhood Questioning
Hulking Dormouse of Lust and DESPAIR™
Gatling Geyser of Rainbow AIDS

"The only way we can ever change anything is to look in the mirror and find no enemy." - Akala  'Find No Enemy'.