Religous Argumentationating

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Is he even still online? According to the Who's Online thing, He's been posting in this thread for a while now...

Also a tendency of our old friend, yes?

[pH]

Prestigious Jargon Fallacy: Using large words unnecessarily in order to convince people your point is correct because it sounds smart rather than because it makes sense.

Nope, I found this site like a week ago because I was looking up fractals and it mentioned Discordianism, which I googled, and it popped up principiadiscordia.com

In Kantian deontology I'm talking specifically about the Categorical Imperative, and i usually just use the second maxim of perfect and imperfect duties within a society as a quick-and-dirty way of figuring morality.
For shopenhauer, its primarily the driving force of people being passion, which leads to egoism or malice, which ends with people being 'immoral' through the categorical imperative.

And where did you offer to clue me in? (oblivious)

[The Good Reverend Roger]

And where did you offer to clue me in? (oblivious)

Your inability to read simple fucking English is not my problem.

[Phox]

And I know what I'm saying, I try to avoid prestigious jargon fallacies, but I also don't want to explain all of that crap.

Sorry, skipper, but you can either explain it, or I'm going to say that you're full of shit, especially since I know about those concepts and they don't really mesh, when you get down to it. So, you're either talking out of your ass, or you have some insight. t's the former if you don't explain for sure, and 85% chance of bullshit if you do, but I'll give you the 15% benefit of the doubt.

You're wasting your time.  I can feel it down in my diseased and scabby testicles.

I'll give this one a chance, Rog. Just one. But a chance nonetheless.  

Prestigious Jargon Fallacy: Using large words unnecessarily in order to convince people your point is correct because it sounds smart rather than because it makes sense.

Nope, I found this site like a week ago because I was looking up fractals and it mentioned Discordianism, which I googled, and it popped up principiadiscordia.com

In Kantian deontology I'm talking specifically about the Categorical Imperative, and i usually just use the second maxim of perfect and imperfect duties within a society as a quick-and-dirty way of figuring morality.
For shopenhauer, its primarily the driving force of people being passion, which leads to egoism or malice, which ends with people being 'immoral' through the categorical imperative.

And where did you offer to clue me in? (oblivious)

Now for a weather update: 100% chance of bullshit.  

[The Wizard]

Also a tendency of our old friend, yes?

Maybe. Still, haven't seen anything to suggest this one's an asshole. Oblivious and outlandish, but at least he hasn't started firing out gibberish and page longs rants about how we're all acolytes in the Cult of Roger. Gonna give this guy the benefit of the doubt until then.

And where did you offer to clue me in? (oblivious)

A page or so ago. Suggestion: read replies before posting again.

[pH]

Well then I'll take any offers of solutions to obliviousness

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

Define "karma," it means many different things to many different faiths.

I'm agnostic for the same reasons Faust described, however, I lean much more towards atheism because it's incredibly unlikely that there is a god in ANY of the ways that I've read about god being conceived. That is, except for non-supernatural explanations of a god. If god isn't supernatural, why use such a supernaturally loaded term?

In terms of my conception of Discordianism, I would characterize it in Heraclitean terms: I've never thought about it the same way twice. I'd also add that it is informed by hypnosis, falsifiability, humor, pragmatism, and a desire to engage with people with contrasting beliefs.

In regards to your rules:
1. I think you're personally a gherkin-jawed bumworm for trying to impose rules on this thread (demonstrating a lack of knowledge about this community).
2. Logic is for math and pondering the meaning of the existence of navel fluff.
3. There are taste buds in your lungs.
4. I don't like it, and I'll stay.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

Well then I'll take any offers of solutions to obliviousness

Well, there's a few things.

1.  I'm a horrible fucking cunt, and I'm going to hate you no matter what you do, so I don't really care if you take the advice, nor should you take my reaction to you as any sort of board "moral authority".  I fucking hate you for being a primate, and nothing you can do or say will change that.

2.  http://www.principiadiscordia.com/forum/index.php?topic=26864.0  <--- Read this.

3.  Stop trying to wow us on your first day.  I for one have seen weirder shit in my jockey shorts on any given evening, and your desperate attempts to demonstrate your outlandishness is tiresome.  Fucking chill out, relax just a fucking bit, and maybe try to get to know some people and maybe see what we're about before jabbering nonsense about Goddamn tomahawks.  This is Discordia, not Jackass, the Movie.

[Don Coyote]

see what we're about before jabbering nonsense about Goddamn tomahawks.  

But what if I jabber on about tomahawks?

[The Good Reverend Roger]

I'm agnostic for the same reasons Faust described, however, I lean much more towards atheism because it's incredibly unlikely that there is a god in ANY of the ways that I've read about god being conceived.

Fucking optimist.  God's real, and he's gonna eat us all when we die.

[The Good Reverend Roger]

see what we're about before jabbering nonsense about Goddamn tomahawks.  

But what if I jabber on about tomahawks?

Then I will pay Josh to put fucking antabuse in your bourbon.  See if I fucking don't.

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

see what we're about before jabbering nonsense about Goddamn tomahawks.  

But what if I jabber on about tomahawks?

STFU Donny, you're out of your element.

[Don Coyote]

see what we're about before jabbering nonsense about Goddamn tomahawks.  

But what if I jabber on about tomahawks?

Then I will pay Josh to put fucking antabuse in your bourbon.  See if I fucking don't.

STFU Donny, you're out of your element.

No, netty, I am not.

[pH]

NET has figured out the goal of the rules, which was little more than agitation. +10
As for karma, a balance of some kind in the world. Does it mean if i punch you, someone is going to punch me? Not at all. Just that somehow, everything will end up in an equilibrium of some kind. For example, you're born with nothing, and shortly after you die you have nothing.

Roger, I did enough thread creeping to figure out that you smack everyone mentally.

And yet again, I promise, I'm not going for 'lets impress people'. Angry would involve more underhanded comments on my part by the way.

And i know I am strange to some extent, but by no means the strangest, nor am i slightly impressive.

[ñͤͣ̄ͦ̌̑͗͊͛͂͗ ̸̨̨̣̺̼̣̜͙͈͕̮̊̈́̈͂͛̽͊ͭ̓͆ͅé ̰̓̓́ͯ́́͞]

I'm agnostic for the same reasons Faust described, however, I lean much more towards atheism because it's incredibly unlikely that there is a god in ANY of the ways that I've read about god being conceived.

Fucking optimist.  God's real, and he's gonna eat us all when we die.

God is microorganisms?